From what I understand about all of this, HR2058 and the Cole-Bishop Amendment accomplish the same thing moving the Deeming date from 2007. The main difference is that the Cole-Bishop Amendment includes provisions for reasonable regulation of our industry. This sensible proposed regulation included in the amendment boosted its support within both parties, and it passed 31-19 in the House Appropriations Committee.
From what I am seeing, HR2058 has stalled and has very little chance of moving forward
Phil Busardo and Dimitris Agrafiotis discuss this in detail in Phil's latest video.
What I am not understanding is why everyone is still rallying for HR2058 while the Cole-Bishop Amendment seems to be getting very little attention. If HR2058 is dead/dying and the Cole-Bishop Amendment seems to have support from our elected officials, shouldn't the consumers, businesses, and advocacy groups be directing their effort to the Amendment that has a higher probability of being passed? Or am I even more confused than I realize?
From what I am seeing, HR2058 has stalled and has very little chance of moving forward
Phil Busardo and Dimitris Agrafiotis discuss this in detail in Phil's latest video.
What I am not understanding is why everyone is still rallying for HR2058 while the Cole-Bishop Amendment seems to be getting very little attention. If HR2058 is dead/dying and the Cole-Bishop Amendment seems to have support from our elected officials, shouldn't the consumers, businesses, and advocacy groups be directing their effort to the Amendment that has a higher probability of being passed? Or am I even more confused than I realize?