Is that 0mg pure PG/VG? That should be around 7 and not 4.5
I don't think you can measure a non aqueous solution with PH paper hence the wrong reading.
Is that 0mg pure PG/VG? That should be around 7 and not 4.5
Is that 0mg pure PG/VG? That should be around 7 and not 4.5
I don't think you can measure a non aqueous solution with PH paper hence the wrong reading.
Yes it is, straight PG/VG with no added water, which seems to have no effect on the color of the paper other than darkening it. However, the moment you add nic, it shows up as substantially alkali. Every juice I've tested, even substantially citrusy ones, as well as unflavored, indicate in the 8-8.5 range on that paper, with one exception: The Juul stuff. Juul uses benzoic acid to turn some of the nic in their juuce into a nicotine salt.Is that 0mg pure PG/VG? That should be around 7 and not 4.5
I don't think you can measure a non aqueous solution with PH paper hence the wrong reading.
... Juul uses benzoic acid to turn some of the nic in their juuce into a nicotine salt.
You lower the ph of the nic, which makes odor/taste much less pronounced, and the absorbtion is fastened a little. Btw, Nic in tobacco is in salt-form, I believe.What's advantage with nicotine salt?
If you remember, Big Tobacco was accused on converting nic to "free-based nicotine" (i.e. salts of nic) by addition of ammonia to cigarettes, to increase addiction to nicotine.You lower the ph of the nic, which makes odor/taste much less pronounced, and the absorbtion is fastened a little. Btw, Nic in tobacco is in salt-form, I believe.
Well, all four of our samples have a pH of around 8.5,
That's in the same range as every juice I've ever looked at, except the Juul stuff that IS "pH adjusted" to produce nic salts. That's the bottom one among these:
And here's a previous comparison between 0mg, an older batch of VT nic, and Juul juuce:
Is that 0mg pure PG/VG? That should be around 7 and not 4.5
I don't think you can measure a non aqueous solution with PH paper hence the wrong reading.
Read the above post and went to the aquarium shop at lunch.
Wonder if this might give a more accurate reading?
View attachment 474367
It's designed to give a PH reading of tank water, but I'd guess it would work for any liquid.
I plan to give it a try as soon as my PG/VG and Nic arrive.
I wouldn't use that. I believe you have to use something like 5ml liquid to test and after the test it's ruined so you're wasting a lot of nic that way. Also, the liquid you're going to test has to be colorless to be able to correctly judge the color result. It's probably a mix of thymol blue, methyl red, bromothymol blue and phenolphthalein.Read the above post and went to the aquarium shop at lunch.
Wonder if this might give a more accurate reading?
I'm sorry! Thanks for the correction, mate. I remember reading about it yesterday from some source, but cannot remember from who, but they must be wrong then... I myself have no knowledge whatsoever about chemistry I must admit.If you remember, Big Tobacco was accused on converting nic to "free-based nicotine" (i.e. salts of nic) by addition of ammonia to cigarettes, to increase addiction to nicotine.
I tried to google about nic salts in tobacco itself, but it looks like there is not reliable data (at list on first two pages of search).
Yeah, you're probably right, we should not view those values as meaningful except in relative terms; i.e. all the nics we're testing here are in the same ballpark in terms of pH as all the juices I've ever tested except for Juul's. I think indicates they're not pH-adjusted, which was the question I posted a page back that I was looking into.I just want to remind that pH is valid only for water solutions. All measurements of not-water based liquids have no quantitative meaning. And nicotine is a base, and it may be reflected in color of litmus paper (especially with a tiny bit of water in solution), but I would not pay much attention to quantification of results.
So is the testing done? I wanna see if I am right or not.
Somebody should have PM'd me.I could use some more time Testing at high nic didn't work well for me, so I mixed up fresh bottles of the four samples at my usual 6mg. Differences at this level are more subtle and I want to spend more time with each of the samples.
Good plan.I think we could still get you in on this, Beck. I'm all out of sample bottles right now, but should have more by the middle of next week and will be happy to make up an additional batch.
Your results might not be as "blind" though, since I don't want to hold back the results from the initial participants What I'll do is number your samples instead of lettering them and you won't know what (if any) correlation exists between the numbers on yours and the letters on everyone else's.
BTW, what is "nic c"?