Product reviews censored ?

Discussion in 'Vapor4Life' started by Majestic, Aug 14, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Image has been removed.
URL has been removed.
Email address has been removed.
Media has been removed.
  1. Majestic

    Majestic Super Member Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2009
    Location:
    N.E. Wisconsin
    Early this summer I wrote a negative review regarding the WOW disposable. At the time I had purchased one disposable and later received another one free for ordering. In both instances they had poor battery life (30 - 35 puffs each) and I wrote a review that reflected my experience. To date that review has never been posted. Makes me think the V4L reviews aren't a true reflection of the products sold.

    I did receive a free complimentary WOW disposable when I inquired about the problem I was experiencing. That disposable had a much better battery life (150 puffs). My guess it was newer stock. I didn't bother writing a review on that one since my other review was never posted.
     
  2. K9Luvr

    K9Luvr Ultra Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location:
    Hampton, VA
    wouldn't be surprised if they didn't publish it.
     
  3. oO_Gab727_Oo

    oO_Gab727_Oo Supplier Associate ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Location:
    Northbrook, Ill, USA
    Hi Majestic,
    I''m glad to hear that your 3rd disposable worked well. The reviews have to be moderated before posting them because otherwise we get spam. Thank you for writing reviews, they are very helpful. Please private message me the name you used when writing the review and i'll look into it for you. :)
     
  4. Majestic

    Majestic Super Member Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2009
    Location:
    N.E. Wisconsin
    No need to PM. Review name was the same as I use here.

    After the good performance of the third disposable I did a little dissection on the two poor performers and gave both their batteries a charge. Yes, the batteries are rechargeable. When fully charged, one lasted for 146 puffs while the other did 162. That would lead me to believe either they weren't fully charged from the factory or had been on the shelf for a while.
     
  5. venomous voice

    venomous voice Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Location:
    Milwaukee WI
    Its not only reviews that get censored, it seems any negative comments get the boot.... I responded to a thread about the smileomizer issue there, and haven't been able to post without moderator review since!!!
     
  6. ibndevilish

    ibndevilish Senior Member Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2014
    Location:
    Torrington ,CT
    This company also does it with the juice also. I USED to be a customer and had probs with one of the juices and wrote a review 3 different times and it never posted. I no longer do business with a company that doesn't allow for real people to do a review. I have since found a few good companies that allow honest reviews. I spent 20.00 on juice and ended up with the same juice lot they sent. If you think something is wrong with a juice and send it back to be tested ( they had me send it back ) to only have that company send the same lot number where the juice can have something wrong with it is just wrong. I sent all my juice back and told them to keep it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page