Now that I can get on board with!
There are so many worthwhile charitable efforts it's hard to pick your favorites.
Meals on Wheels is one of my favorites.
And anything that helps dogs.
FDA Sen Johnson (R-Wis) demands answers from FDA RE deeming
- Thread starter DrMA
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
There are so many worthwhile charitable efforts it's hard to pick your favorites.
Meals on Wheels is one of my favorites.
And anything that helps dogs.
Yeah, I just picked the B&G club since everyone seems so concerned with the children. Of course, that kind of volunteer work usually involved actually interacting with those children.Now that I can get on board with!
There are so many worthwhile charitable efforts it's hard to pick your favorites.
Meals on Wheels is one of my favorites.
And anything that helps dogs.
we all know sheeple.I shoulda said ignorant people erm sheep like people.
That does Not describe you!
sadly there's more causes than we can choose from, but I've personally become very picky in vetting them first with
charity watchdogs. As a survivor, I'm all for pushing research in medicine, yet not one pence will ever go to international heart, cancer, associations for their low % to use. all I can add
is follow your heart, and vet the cause first.pif has to be the most rewarding act of love we small mortals can endeavor.
Cheers
Maybe they could support themselves by actually working at an actual job like the rest of the adult population, instead of riding on 'the village' gravy train whilst snatching up everything they deem 'bad' from everybody.Really? And what is "the village" going to do with their spare time?
I can only imagine the various shenanigans they'll get up to.
Maybe then they could learn some humility and be responsible for the choices they make in their own lives and let everybody else make their own.
Maybe it's too much to ask of the human race as a whole to just live and let live?
A bit off topic, but for those of you who seem to be on the lookout for worthwhile humanitarian efforts... there exists this computing project called World Community Grid. You install the software on your computer and it uses its otherwise idle resources to run projects related to everything from cancer and AIDS to producing clean water and energy.
We actually have a similar thing going for Team ECF: Help fight cancer with F@H! join team ECF today!!!!!!
We all know one?
Heck, it's not all that long ago I WAS one.
Not since I've been a member.
Interesting. I've run that project in the past as well.
I wouldn't trust those liars with my kids.
Last edited:
I apologize if this has been asked, and answered...
We're staring at the FDA deeming regs kicking in, in 9 days. Has the FDA responded to Sen. Johnson's last request? Has he files any kind of injunction to stop the regs from taking effect?
We're staring at the FDA deeming regs kicking in, in 9 days. Has the FDA responded to Sen. Johnson's last request? Has he files any kind of injunction to stop the regs from taking effect?
Sen Johnson doesn't have the power to issue an injunction. All his committee can do is haul the FDA before the committee and make them squirm. When it comes down to brass tacks, he has no enforcement authority at all. That's up to Congress as a whole.
One of the Biggest thing that this Oversight Committee can do is Obtain Information from the FDA and then Enter that Information into the Public Record.
This Information can then be used an Interested Party in a Lawsuit against the FDA. Or to support a Congressional of HHS Action.
Of course, the FDA knows this. And that is why they are going to Drag their Feet for as Long as Possible.
And when they do Answer a Direct Question, it is going to be a Vague and as Convoluted as possible. So as Not to have Actual said Anything that could be Used Against them.
Without a doubt.
And as I've said before, I'd pay to watch this as a Pay-Per-View event.
I'd like nothing better at this point than to see some of those monsters squirm.
I don't fish because I don't like the idea of putting a fish through that experience.
I don't kill spiders, and instead catch them and take them outside.
I have often thought that I would never torture anyone, no matter how heinous they are.
But seeing them squirm seems like a pretty decent compromise to me.
I'm all for that, no question about it.
Without a doubt.
And as I've said before, I'd pay to watch this as a Pay-Per-View event.
I'd like nothing better at this point than to see some of those monsters squirm.
I don't fish because I don't like the idea of putting a fish through that experience.
I don't kill spiders, and instead catch them and take them outside.
I have often thought that I would never torture anyone, no matter how heinous they are.
But seeing them squirm seems like a pretty decent compromise to me.
I'm all for that, no question about it.
I'm Not an advocate of More Government in this country. But Government Oversight is one Area where I do think we Need an Increase.
That and Transparency.
Why was the Public Not Allowed to know any of the Details leading up to Deeming? And why is the Information the FDA used to justify Deeming so Hard to Access?
I totally agree with the need for oversight. My only peeve is this so called transparency. IMHO it's just another word that now means so much it has lost any objective meaning. It is now just a buzz word like synergy used to justify anything anyone want's for any reason.
Whenever I hear the word transparency I automatically think here is another one making unrealistic,unsubstantiated or just plain false claims in a sanctimonious tirade of self aggrandizement.
I know sometimes people have legitimate claims. That's not the problem. One also must have legitimate expectations as to the outcome of the complaint. There is no expectation for the whole world to stop on a dime and devote 100% effort on each and every complain big,small and,in between. At the very least one should wait until the jury has made it's verdict before collecting the wood for the fire.
Just a pet peeve regards,
Mike
I totally agree with the need for oversight. My only peeve is this so called transparency. IMHO it's just another word that now means so much it has lost any objective meaning. It is now just a buzz word like synergy used to justify anything anyone want's for any reason.
Whenever I hear the word transparency I automatically think here is another one making unrealistic,unsubstantiated or just plain false claims in a sanctimonious tirade of self aggrandizement.
I know sometimes people have legitimate claims. That's not the problem. One also must have legitimate expectations as to the outcome of the complaint. There is no expectation for the whole world to stop on a dime and devote 100% effort on each and every complain big,small and,in between. At the very least one should wait until the jury has made it's verdict before collecting the wood for the fire.
Just a pet peeve regards,
Mike
Not talk'n about So-Called Transparency Mike. Talking about Real Transparency.
And we can Start with the FDA. Why should the Public Not Be Able to See the Information/Data that was used to write the Deeming Rule Set?
Post it to Web. And lets ALL sit around and See for a Change EXACTLY how our Government Works.
- Status
