Shaking the tree - terminology...

Status
Not open for further replies.

riseabovethestorm

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 22, 2013
536
653
Grayling, MI, USA
www.kalkaskamma.com

flowerpots

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 21, 2013
1,411
1,968
my desk
As a semi-newbie, I can relate to a point, but this is my 8-months-into-vaping point-by-point response:

OK, I'm a newbie. Picked this up as about a month ago as what I believe to be a better alternative to smoking tobacco. I've spent much more time than necessary understanding what's what. All I read/hear in the "vaping" world reminds me of all the BS in the audiophile world of subjectivity over objectivity, form over function, obscure terminology for obfuscation instead of understanding.

The terminology just seems to be part of an exclusive, private club. You're either in or out, and it's a bar to entry.

All forms of living have terminology - pick any activity, sport, hobby, job, whatever, and there will be jargon specific to it. Man-up.

Peeves:

"Vaping." OK, I understand the desire to differentiate from smoking tobacco, I really do. But please understand that "vaping" is likely to convey (illegal) drug connotations to the general public, right or wrong. I can't pretend to have come up with something better, but "smoking alternative" or "vapor smoking" is probably better received, whether it looks like a cigarette or not.

Vaping was coined long before you or I got here and it's likely here to stay. Whether it's good, bad, silly, connotes other activities, I think we will likely see it everywhere. Do you have a better term?

"Analogs." Just call them cigarettes, which is what everyone else does. If you want to make people think they're not part of the club, calling them analogs is a good start.

I tend to agree with you here, I thought this was an odd term when I first started too, but again, it's social jargon terminology around the activity of vaping. Not worth a fight if you ask me.

"Cartos." "Attos." "Clearos." "Glassos." etc. They're all atomizers/vaporizers (pick a term). I get the whole custom/differentiation thing, but lose the cuteness and use one all encompassing term to refer to this part. Groucho, Harpo, Chico, and Zeppo are OK.

Okay, here is where you are just wrong. The terms do matter because the terms describe the type of delivery device it is, what kind of materials it uses/is made from, and how it you use it. I was confused by the terms for weeks myself. You read, ask questions, learn, then move on.

"e-juice," "e-liquid." It's not the juice of anything. It's not electronic ("e") in any way. It's a liquid, just call it that. Or maybe "e-cigarette liquid."

I don't know how to even respond to this. It's liquid used for an electronic device. Doesn't seem like rocket science. (Did someone pee in your wheaties this morning?)

... does "mod' mean? Perhaps it at one time meant modified. But, if you can buy a "mod" off the shelf, it's not modified, is it? Just call it a battery. Maybe it's fancy. It doesn't matter, it's a battery (holder).

A mod is a term used to refer to modified device, yes. It's a catch-all term in some cases, but for some, it's specific. It's not the battery you use for powering the device. The device is the mod, you insert the batteries into the device to power it. For beginners, the term batteries is what refers to cigalike models, eGo style batterires and their VV counterparts - regulated batteries with a circuit board.

VV/VW. VV is really CV - sure, you control (vary) it, but you're telling it to deliver a Constant Voltage. VW is the same only different, it's actually Constant Wattage. Plain batteries with no electronics provide VV/VW - the Voltage/Wattage varies as you drain the battery. And that terminology come from a long history of professional, lab grade, voltage sources/power supplies, don't try to change it. But it is, first and foremost, a battery.

VV?VW is used to separate it from the standard battery that has a set voltage and wattage which you cannot control. If you can control it, it can be varied, therefore, it's called variable.

Having said all that (and I'm sure I could think of more), I don't expect to change the industry. But many here seem to want to encourage this to go mainstream faster than it already is. The whole terminology thing makes that hard, and presents a barrier to entry - fundamentally there are only three things involved - a power source (call it a battery), a liquid, and a vaporizer. Don't make it harder than it is, that comes later. If you try to get someone into it, tell them to get a battery (and charger), a vaporizer which fits it, and a liquid which tastes good to them - the detail comes later.

It is that simple, but as is true with everything in else in life, the more you learn, the more details you see, so you use different terms. It's much easier to use terms than to makie a 3 paragraph intro for each post you make to explain what you are talking about.

Or, don't. But expect that big tobacco will make it easy to understand/buy/use, and that's where the market will go. This industry is its own worst enemy.
I'm not sure that what we use a terminology between ourselves is going to kill our chances against BT, but maybe I'm naive. What people see is not this forum. They see websites, commercials, read news articles and listen to radio/TV news.
 
Last edited:

Mike.S

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 30, 2013
158
165
Michigan
Your not shaking the tree now. Your just trying to piss on it.
You demonstrate one of the big problems with modern society. Rather that argue with logic and thought, you take things personally/emotionally. That's affected politics, where the parties can no longer agree to disagree - it's "us against them." It affects constructive discussion, where people want to turn intellectual arguments into personal attacks.

If you don't have an informed rebuttal, simply don't reply.
 

riseabovethestorm

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 22, 2013
536
653
Grayling, MI, USA
www.kalkaskamma.com
As a semi-newbie, I can relate to a point, but this is my 8-months-into-VAPING point-by-point response:



All forms of living have terminology - pick any activity, sport, hobby, job, whatever, and there will be jargon specific to it. Man-up.



Vaping was coined long before you or I got here and it's likely here to stay. Whether it's good, bad, silly, connotes other activities, I think we will likely see it everywhere. Do you have a better term?



I tend to agree with you here, I thought this was an odd term when I first started too, but again, it's social jargon terminology around the activity of vaping. Not worth a fight if you ask me.



Okay, here is where you are just wrong. The terms do matter because the terms describe the type of delivery device it is, what kind of materials it uses/is made from, and how it you use it. I was confused by the terms for weeks myself. You read, ask questions, learn, then move on.



I don't know how to even respond to this. It's liquid used for an electronic device. Doesn't seem like rocket science. (Did someone pee in your wheaties this morning?)



A mod is a term used to refer to modified device, yes. It's a catch-all term in some cases, but for some, it's specific. It's not the battery you use for powering the device. The device is the mod, you insert the batteries into the device to power it. For beginners, the term batteries is what refers to cigalike models, eGo style batterires and their VV counterparts - regulated batteries with a circuit board.



VV?VW is used to separate it from the standard battery that has a set voltage and wattage which you cannot control. If you can control it, it can be varied, therefore, it's called variable.



It is that simple, but as is true with everything in else in life, the more you learn, the more details you see, so you use different terms. It's much easier to use terms than to makie a 3 paragraph intro for each post you make to explain what you are talking about.

I'm not sure that what we use a terminology between ourselves is going to kill our chances against BT, but maybe I'm naive. What people see is not this forum. They see websites, commercials, read news articles and listen to radio/TV news.

This thread mostly fell into a garbled mess of Fight Club references, but let's all applaud this very eloquent argument.
 

riseabovethestorm

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 22, 2013
536
653
Grayling, MI, USA
www.kalkaskamma.com
I bought a gift for OP:
1352304.gif


If you understand that, good. If not, I'm not explaining it to you.
 

CrimsonJack

Ursus Praedonum
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 5, 2013
1,821
3,941
The Vobbit Hole
You demonstrate one of the big problems with modern society. Rather that argue with logic and thought, you take things personally/emotionally. That's affected politics, where the parties can no longer agree to disagree - it's "us against them." It affects constructive discussion, where people want to turn intellectual arguments into personal attacks.

If you don't have an informed rebuttal, simply don't reply.

And here's where you lose me, man. You step in with a long winded rant, obviously aimed at stirring up a response, then try to come across as the rational one when people get riled up by claiming to want an intellectual discussion. You don't want emotional responses, then don't troll dude.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread