I tend to agree with the above, although I don't believe you'll get much convincing information from anyone about them. Sony never intended for these batteries to be sold on the open market in the first place. I believe Sony issued the statement that they would be discontinued (for litigation purposes - my thoughts), yet they continue to be seen in rechargeable power tools and have begun showing up on battery vendor websites like RTD, Illumn, and Orbtronics, all reputable vendors.They never were discontinued, they were discontinued for public sale.
Several vendors have authenticated them as new stock some dated just a few months ago.
Looks like sony finally got those new plants open and running
To my best knowledge, the Orbtronic SX30 is a great option for the Sony VTC4 2100mah 30 amp battery. However, our own Mooch has done his own independent testing of the SX30:I saw them on Orbtronic, and also at RTD
RTD Vapor VTC5
I've been reading all morning about Sony, and everybody's opinions about what the heck has been going on...
I just want a 30A continuous battery.
With Orbtronic being a trusted company, what's up with the Orbtronic brand batteries?
IMR 18650 30A Orbtronic SX30 Ultra High Drain Hybrid Rechargeable Battery
To my best knowledge, the Orbtronic SX30 is a great option for the Sony VTC4 2100mah 30 amp battery. However, our own Mooch has done his own independent testing of the SX30:
Orbtronic SX30 30A 2100mAh Button-Top 18650 Bench Test Results...a 23A cell at best
I personally wouldn't build that low. Everyone is free to set their own parameters, and I can only say what mine are.So, what the heck is a guy trying to sub ohm at .175 to do?
Are there just no 30 amp batteries on the market anymore?
Would you use a vtc5 currently being offered by RTD in a build that low?
It applies mostly to mechanical mods. Not that long ago people went to mechanical mods to be able to heat their e-liquid at higher temperature (via sub-ohms), as regulated mods at the time wouldn't fire a sub-ohm coil. That was because of processor amp limits and protected circuitry which saw a sub-ohm coil as a short.If one gets a regulated, protected device...is it inherently safer to vape at that high a wattage?
I feel like an idiot asking that...I know there SUPPOSED to be safe, but then some folks vape at .0whatever and claim it's just fine.
Does the information in your last post only apply to mechanicals?
I've never had a higher end regulated device...after a couple of 12V mods, I went mech.
I'm wondering if I can get that .175vape, in a safe manner.
The plants aren't up and running. Grimmgreen read and linked an article released by Sony in a vlog recently telling everyone exactly when they stopped producing the vtc5 and it was at least one year ago. It basically warned that anyone selling them now is either really old stock or fakes.They never were discontinued, they were discontinued for public sale.
Several vendors have authenticated them as new stock some dated just a few months ago.
Looks like sony finally got those new plants open and running
Does the article say anything specifically about vtc5s? "most highly trusted battery retailers on the Web" really? You mean people trying to sell stuff? There have been multiple articles over time about Sony condemning the consumer use of those cells. You believe a retailer claiming something is authentic that few people can really dispute when the actual electronics giant is saying they stopped making them a long time ago?And yet some of the people reporting new stock are some of the most highly trusted battery retailers on the web........
Japan times ( japans wall street journal)
“Following the closure of the Tochigi plant, Sony will have just three domestic lithium-ion battery plants… By consolidating lithium-ion battery plants and improving efficiency, Sony aims to better compete with foreign rivals.”
Interestingly the article goes on to state the biggest threat sony sees is Tesla's new plant
Hmmm lets see ........Does the article say anything specifically about vtc5s? "most highly trusted battery retailers on the Web" really? You mean people trying to sell stuff? There have been multiple articles over time about Sony condemning the consumer use of those cells. You believe a retailer claiming something is authentic that few people can really dispute when the actual electronics giant is saying they stopped making them a long time ago?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why won't you own any Sony cells?Hmmm lets see ........
if i was forced to choose i would trust the guys at illum supply and orbtronics over a doofy blogger any dayday.
So lets see why.
Orbronix openly calls out manufacturers on false claims even at the risk of losing sales. So it would seem money isn't thier only motivating factor
How about illum supply.
Well when he accidentally got duped into buying fakes. He went on a reddit and email campaign doing his best to search out and find every single cell he sold. Ate all the shippibg costs and replaced the batteries.
Sounds like someone who cares a bit more then just making sales.
As compared to
Some numbnut on the internet who gets paid by getting people to click affiliate links in his videos. So more klickbait more money.
Sorry your b&m has his finger in your wallet but not all the top guys in this field are willing to stab vapors and ruin thier name over a few bucks in sales.
And just so its clear- i do not, have not and will not own any sony cells, so i have no stake in any point of view
Why won't you own any Sony cells?
And BTW, I'm more more concerned that those sellers were duped than they are trying to dupe us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looking back i see the wording is a bit negative and misleading. I dont mean it as - i have a grudge and refuse to buy them kind of thing.Why won't you own any Sony cells?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk