yes.
You'd think that ecigs might fall under ATF, not FDA, but most of that is tax related- so aside from that, a synthetic nicotine would still end up falling under the regulation of FDA, because it would still be nicotine (a drug), regardless where it came from.
For instance, naturally occurring opiates (morphine) still falls under the FDA just as the synthetic opiates (methadone) do, and the semi-synthetic opiates (thebaine derivs) do. It doesn't matter where the opiate is derived from, it falls under FDA regs. (and DEA controls, but thats a separate issue).
Did that make sense? I'm awfully tired....communication skills not at 100% efficiency
So, if the nicotine in patches and gum are derived from tobacco the same as in ejuice then why are the patch and gum regulated by the FDA as cessastion products and not tobacco products?