I watched the Entire Video and did Really Didn’t see much that was Misleading or Overtly Slanted.
In fact, it seemed pretty well Balanced.
Yeah, why am I not surprised? Ever heard the term "concern troll"?
I watched the Entire Video and did Really Didn’t see much that was Misleading or Overtly Slanted.
In fact, it seemed pretty well Balanced.
...
It was soon after that I had to shut it down because I couldn't listen to it anymore.
To much BS in too short a timeframe makes my veins stick out of my neck.
My wife says that isn't good for me.
And my screaming, yelling, and cussing upsets the dog.
I really like the extra info. No matter what side your on you can never say its worse then smoking unless u been smoking something else. Be that as it may, id rather be informed regardless of what side the info is coming from.
As I said previously, I thought it was pretty good... even impressive in some ways...Did you think it was that Bad?
How was his statement not truth though? Do you know exactly whats going into your juice? If it was not made in your back yard then I would say thats imposable. I hear a lot of people getting upset and it seems like its only cause the guy did not word something exactly how they would have. Calm down people lol. Things like this are mild in comparison and if we want to be good representatives then keeping cool and rolling with the punches will only help. Who cares what anyone says. I can fart, and u can call it a declaration. Does not make it so. When u think about the first part he had acctually discretided his entire cause if he was against us by stating not enough research had been done, and he was not this or that if I remember rite. So put the fire out. Toke a J tank.As I said previously, I thought it was pretty good... even impressive in some ways...
Until he said there was no tar... unless there was.
I couldn't hear much else after that due to the screaming and yelling and cussing.
And I had to shut it down shortly thereafter.
I don't know where it went from there, but from the comments here it sounds like it got worse.
Although I'm not sure how it could get worse than postulating the impossible presence of tar.
I suppose if he said little children could die just by looking at the vapor...
How was his statement not truth though? Do you know exactly whats going into your juice? If it was not made in your back yard then I would say thats imposable. I hear a lot of people getting upset and it seems like its only cause the guy did not word something exactly how they would have. Calm down people lol.(QUOTE]
The highlights I took from the video
-Dummy with PV in airport makes him uncomfortable
-Classification debate
-How they work
Claims- Nicotine ingested/go into liver, Dosage levels very high/uncontrollable, more addictive then anologs, contains tar.
-Neuro effects of nicotine, links to schizohrenia
-States that nicotine is a gateway drug more dangerous than Mary J.
-Promotes NRTs
-Claims all evidence to be inconclusive
-Biggest worry is that the hipsters take to vaping and undo all the stop smoking efforts of the government, little kids will all start vaping.
-More education for people about evil nicotine.
Some of his statement are true and informative but there are some very ignorant claims will just rally haters to work harder to take away our PV's
-States that nicotine is a gateway drug more dangerous than Mary J.
Claims- Nicotine ingested/go into liver, Dosage levels very high/uncontrollable, more addictive then anologs, contains tar.
...
I suppose if he said little children could die just by looking at the vapor...
Oh yeah, that was pretty hardcore... for Southern California.BTW - Did you get hit with that Hail Storm Last Week? I haven't seen a Hail Storm like that in a Long Time. At least not in So-Cal.
Oh yeah, that was pretty hardcore... for Southern California.
I'm sure folks from other parts of the country would have hardly even noticed it.
I've lived here all my life, and we've definitely had worse.
But not often, and not for quite some time.
Did anyone else notice how he described "a very large man sits down right next to me" at the beginning of the video? Why not just say "a man sat down beside me"? The use of the words "very large" and "RIGHT next" implies a deep seated intolerance of the obese and self-righteous indignation at having his space violated by one.
Intolerance mixed with uninformed opinions. What a tool.
"If e-cigarettes are just substituting one dangerous habit for another (we don't know that yet), they're probably still better than cigarettes"