There is another thread started earlier. This topic, more or less, is reported in a NYTimes article printed in 1998. Do you suppose, 18 years later, there is still no clarity? In addition to the Nobel prizes may be we need the Fibber prizes. Who should get the Fibber pize in medical research for 2016? There are so many richly deserving candidates, how can we pick just one?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.