From what (little) I know (and in agreement with snork), alkaloid content may vary by strain of tobacco. This is why it's so important to research the specific tobacco one plans to use in such an extraction. That said, at least it's not the pyrolysis byproduct of nicotine, which is rather carcinogenic in and of itself.
We're all in agreement there, which is why I previously said
My thoughts on this (I touched on it last night) would be that the certain alkaloids are in differing proportions depending on the tobacco used--I am certain each vendor uses completely different tobaccos strains/blends.
And we're certainly all in agreement that this is still far, far from smoking.
Akin to WTA content, TSNA content can vary just as wildly depending on whether you're looking at a producer or non-producer (tobacco strain) of TSNAs.
Just make sure to research the certain type of tobacco you're using, make sure it isn't a known producer of TSNAs, or you're going to concentrate the harmful ones alongside the desired ones.
Now, I don't know if we're quite in agreement here. Sure, fresh/un-dried tobacco as opposed to any cured/fermented (unpasteurized) tobacco will have vastly different levels of TSNAs (the curing/fermenting/processing is, as far as I know, what produces TSNAs formation, or the nitrosation of the amines in tobacco into TSNA), but I don't believe raw, uncured tobacco, can even be used optimally for consumption (smoking, extracting, etc.). Plus, TSNAs are of course specific to tobacco, hence the name, and I don't think there is a such tobacco that is a "non-producer" of them.
From what I know, in uncured tobacco, TSNAs are in trace amounts, and in cured tobacco (even more in fermented tobacco) is where you see the spike (unless it's been pasteurized like snus); even in the same sample of cured tobacco, depending on how long it has been stored and the temperature in which it is stored, the TSNA levels can be higher after time has passed.
What does all of that mean? How the hell should I know?! LOL. Seriously though, I guess the point is that there is likely some detectable amount of TSNAs in WTA, meaning in the tobacco used, but to what degree is the question. Even if untreated tobacco is used, that's not saying that it is uncured. I would like to imagine a day (maybe it's now?) when WTA was made from pasteurized tobacco, much like snus, so that the TSNAs can be more stabilized at lower "safe(er)" levels--that is not to say though, totally absent of TSNAs. So I don't know if any research of a usable tobacco to "make sure it isn't a known producer of TSNAs" will yield any results.
Resources used for this post:
Tobacco.org Progress Report
EFFECT OF BALE SIZE AND DENSITY ON TSNA FORMATION IN BALED BURLEY TOBACCO (Tobacco Science)
Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden (PDF)
Last edited: