So why exactly doesn't Provape do user upgradable firmware? What's the reasoning behind this? To me this is an ancient way of doing things but maybe there's a good reason?
I'm not an EE but my guess is that the P3 tube design and firmware base code was designed to only permit an authorized dealer to perform the upgrade.
All the more reason they should've made the device user upgradable.At roll out of the P3, how could they predict which dealers are willing to perform upgrades?
That really is a non argument. Take TomTom for example, their PND's are user upgradable but at the same time are completely locked down. Many people have tried to crack the security but have failed. The same can be done with a mod.As much as I would love to have this feature in the P3 and also understand that "China is watching" /lol I can live with it.
You're funny...I remember reading the programmer costs €200. I can also see that the cable on the left is used to connect the unit via USB with a PC. I'm guessing the programmer holds the actual software that writes the firmware to the flash memory on the ProVari chip. Connect the programmer to a PC, send a command to the programmer to write the firmware to the ProVari, and the programmer carries out the command. What Provape should have done is use a different connection protocol that lets the user connect the P3 directly to a PC. Provape then could have made the updating software available to the end user so he or she can carry out the upgrade. The programmer is completely unnecessary and it's a very outdated way of doing things. It's not like we're living in the 1990's. Provape needs to take a step into modern times. And if they don't and go out of business because of it, well, that's what they deserve. Adapt or die.
Mark Twain.I remember reading the programmer costs €200. I can also see that the cable on the left is used to connect the unit via USB with a PC. I'm guessing the programmer holds the actual software that writes the firmware to the flash memory on the ProVari chip. Connect the programmer to a PC, send a command to the programmer to write the firmware to the ProVari, and the programmer carries out the command. What Provape should have done is use a different connection protocol that lets the user connect the P3 directly to a PC. Provape then could have made the updating software available to the end user so he or she can carry out the upgrade. The programmer is completely unnecessary and it's a very outdated way of doing things. It's not like we're living in the 1990's. Provape needs to take a step into modern times. And if they don't and go out of business because of it, well, that's what they deserve. Adapt or die.
I remember reading the programmer costs €200. I can also see that the cable on the left is used to connect the unit via USB with a PC. I'm guessing the programmer holds the actual software that writes the firmware to the flash memory on the ProVari chip. Connect the programmer to a PC, send a command to the programmer to write the firmware to the ProVari, and the programmer carries out the command. What Provape should have done is use a different connection protocol that lets the user connect the P3 directly to a PC. Provape then could have made the updating software available to the end user so he or she can carry out the upgrade. The programmer is completely unnecessary and it's a very outdated way of doing things. It's not like we're living in the 1990's. Provape needs to take a step into modern times. And if they don't and go out of business because of it, well, that's what they deserve. Adapt or die.
Woulda Should Coulda...I remember reading the programmer costs €200. I can also see that the cable on the left is used to connect the unit via USB with a PC. I'm guessing the programmer holds the actual software that writes the firmware to the flash memory on the ProVari chip. Connect the programmer to a PC, send a command to the programmer to write the firmware to the ProVari, and the programmer carries out the command. What Provape should have done is use a different connection protocol that lets the user connect the P3 directly to a PC. Provape then could have made the updating software available to the end user so he or she can carry out the upgrade. The programmer is completely unnecessary and it's a very outdated way of doing things. It's not like we're living in the 1990's. Provape needs to take a step into modern times. And if they don't and go out of business because of it, well, that's what they deserve. Adapt or die.
A USB port on a ProVari would have to be between the button and window and would look and feel horrible...
A USB port on a ProVari would have to be between the button and window and would look and feel horrible...
The positive contact on the board is also a direct connection to the chip, otherwise they wouldn't be able to update it. User upgradable firmware only requires a different connection protocol and a cable with a connection the the P3 board and a USB connection on the other end.stevegmu said:A USB port on a ProVari would have to be between the button and window and would look and feel horrible...
It's the same for the firmware of the SX Mini yet that is user upgradable. Was that you whole argument?Robert Cromwell said:Perhaps because the firmware also contains the safety features? Like not firing below a certain resistance? Perhaps because improper firmware could damage the hardware? etc....
This is the song that never ends...The positive contact on the board is also a direct connection to the chip, otherwise they wouldn't be able to update it. User upgradable firmware only requires a different connection protocol and a cable with a connection the the P3 board and a USB connection on the other end.
It's the same for the firmware of the SX Mini yet that is user upgradable. Was that you whole argument?
Provape needs to take a step into modern times. And if they don't and go out of business because of it, well, that's what they deserve. Adapt or die.
The positive contact on the board is also a direct connection to the chip, otherwise they wouldn't be able to update it. User upgradable firmware only requires a different connection protocol and a cable with a connection the the P3 board and a USB connection on the other end.
It's the same for the firmware of the SX Mini yet that is user upgradable. Was that you whole argument?
They can use the same connector they use now to connect the board to the programmer and a USB connection on the other end.Have you seen the inside of a ProVari? People would damage the board trying to fish a USB cable in there and ProVari would have to be larger to accommodate the extra hardware...