Highlights (emphasis added):
«If e-cigarettes are allowed to continue evolving and competing with conventional cigarettes, and if medical professionals and the media inform smokers truthfully about their harms relative to smoking, there is a good chance that within the next ten years smoking...
I read the headline as intending to highlight the fact that pending irresponsible and malicious regs in the EU and US will soon hand over the entire vaping market to Big Tobacco.
Related: ASH LDN press release
http://ash.org.uk/media-room/press-releases/:electronic-cigarette-use-among-smokers-slows-as-perceptions-of-harm-increase
Also, new study published in NEJM demonstrates traditional smoker demonization, bullying, and hatespeech tools used by TC don't help anyone...
hey, thanks for your post Alison. I'm still not used to this new forum setup, so I missed it. Those May-day "riots" were actually a couple hundred wannabe hippies protesting peacefully until the police bullied them. No major damage was done.
Missed one very relevant case, where A and B are correlated simply by chance, and there's no plausible functional relationship between them
Spurious Correlations
This war is for the hearts and minds of the general public. ANTZ have only lied to turn the tide of public opinion against vaping. Not one word coming out of their mouths has been true since the very beginning. I'm sorry if you feel like promoting this particular headline taints the purity of...
That's what the Peer-reviewed "science" said, that's what I reported. What? You don't like antz's own methods turned around and used against them? Fight fire with fire!
Let's get 1 thing straight. You can't ban something just because you don't like how it looks. There's no more scientific basis to ban vaping indoors that there is to ban breathing or looking left. This is what "arbitrary & capricious" means
Nah, he's been busy traveling to various conferences and forums, speaking about TC #sciencedenial and incitement to institutionalized desk murder with their lies about THR and vaping
Putting the UCSF label on that particular guy was not accidental ;)
Also note how FDA and CDC are both propping the same ladder. I debated for a while which one should be on top. Decided on CDC because, well... this thread is about Frieden
Portrayal of vaping by MSM shows blatant negative bias. What's more troublesome is the apparent increasing trend by MSM to use dogmatic drivel against ecigs as click-bait, since they've noticed vapers react in large numbers to these kinds of stories. Has our advocacy fed the MSM trolls all this...
Highlights:
currently 2.6 million adults in Great Britain using electronic cigarettes.
Of these, approximately 1.1 million are ex-smokers while 1.4 million continue to use tobacco alongside their electronic cigarette use
Regular use of the devices is confined to current and ex-smokers and use...
«The present analysis examines what evidence and research strategies would be needed to empirically detect such a gateway effect, if there were one, explaining key methodological concepts including causation and confounding, examining the logic of the claim, identifying potentially useful data...
«Electronic cigarettes produce high levels of aldehyde only in dry puff conditions, in which the liquid overheats, causing a strong unpleasant taste that e-cigarette users detect and avoid. Under normal vaping conditions aldehyde emissions are minimal, even in new-generation high-power...
I believe you're rather referring to this post by Carl Philips
Dear Public Health: the public despises you, so you are probably doing it wrong | Anti-THR Lies and related topics
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.