I don't know of a list, but, if you're interested in a particular vendor it's easy to find out if they support advocacy. For example, a few seconds of google-fu and you could find a blog, like this
Call to Action for WA Vapers | Mt Baker Vapor << :thumb:
It's even worse than that. If we had listened to the "health" fundamentalists diet advice in the '80's we'd all be dead. Time to fire these parasites and use the funds for something actually useful, like subsidies for vape gear :)
She needs to be fired. NOW!
I would also encourage her to drink that 1-gal bottle of bleach just to prove her point. I volunteer to drink 1 mL of e-juice in return. Let's see what happens.
That is just perfect. If every individual vaper in the US would write to Congress, they'd have ~6 million letters to deal with. Now that would be a sight to behold.
Excellent must-read for every vaper. Excerpts:
«Beginning in 2009, the crusade against this breakthrough technology electronic cigarettes and related reduced-harm vapor products, known as e-cigs has stealthily spread from coast to coast, under the malevolent guidance of the Food and...
This publication verifies that vaping advocates correctly identified the TC conspiracy against the cure for smoking and our tinfoil hats were definitely needed.
This^^^^^
If you're really committed to truth and justice, gather up support and sue the wannabe desk murderers. This lunacy isn't going to stop until we make an example out of some of these murderous parasites.
medical community "agrees" on lots of inane things, because those who disagree get fired:
http://ep-ology.blogspot.com/2010/08/ucla-school-of-public-health-votes-to.html
Oh, wow! look at the overwhelming support! Seeing this really highlights how much the community appreciates the advocacy efforts performed freely by a few dozen vaping advocates and organisations (CASAA, AVA, SFATA, etc).
Yep, goes right along with this:
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/media-general-news/652374-new-jf-etter-publication-anti-vaping-studies-plagued-methodological-ideological-problems.html
Taxpayer-funded policy-driven evidence-making :mad:
NIH funding is clearly a fatal conflict of...
from the abstract:
«Vaporizers do not need to be safe, only safer than cigarettes. However, harm reduction principles are often misunderstood or rejected. In the context of a fierce ideological debate, and major investments by the tobacco industry, it is crucial that...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.