Search results

  1. N

    Irritated sinuses.

    Propylene glycol was observed to cause nose bleeding even at very low concentrations (In Air) compared to vaping (0.2% against 10%). It is not the nicotine nor the flavorings.
  2. N

    A Little Paranoid

    Some things never change. Cigarettes have hundreds of chemicals(That is pure B.s., btw. That list was permitted chemicals.Cigarettes would taste awful if manufacturers add all those chemicals at the max permissible dosage ). Tobacco doesn't cause cancer (Forget about tsna and polonium stuff)...
  3. N

    A Little Paranoid

    Pg,Vg and flavorings aren't chemicals, apparently and One wonders what category they come under.
  4. N

    Greek Cardiologist studies vaping vs smoking - Interview on VapeTeam show this Wednesday

    The ecig devices studied by the greek cardio(s) didn't deliver adequate nicotine. Since they didn't deliver nicotine theses devices are supposedly cardio friendly compared to regular cigarettes. No nicotine- good for cardio system. (wonder Where are those nicotine is good for you, nicotine is...
  5. N

    A Glantzing Blow to Science

    quote : acetic acid, acetone, isoprene, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, averaging around 20% of what the conventional cigarette put into the air.... Some chinese juices (Dekang ?) contain acetic acid to nuetralize nicotine(For better flavor). The other constituents , if the report is correct...
  6. N

    A Glantzing Blow to Science

    My quick observations: German study and Diskin, et al. study appear to be entirely different. There is no way a comparison can be made.One measures air space pollutants and the other measures breath.Also breath measurements are not correlated with time of esmoking.
  7. N

    New ACSH publication - Helping Smokers Quit: The Science Behind Tobacco Harm Reduction

    Luisa,guess i should stop posting.Probably i am spending inordinate amount of time on this forum.
  8. N

    New ACSH publication - Helping Smokers Quit: The Science Behind Tobacco Harm Reduction

    Makes sense.It appears bloggers dont have the same limitations. Other than snus there is enough data worldwide to show that smokeless tobacco has much higher(About 7 times) risk for oral cancer,While snus has consistently shown not contributing to oral cancer.It is also true that smokeless...
  9. N

    New ACSH publication - Helping Smokers Quit: The Science Behind Tobacco Harm Reduction

    Why do i ask?.Perhaps to put things in perspective. I was going through some US smokeless tobacco company websites.None of them seems to share the enthusiasm of Mr Bradu on smokeless tobacco. Here is one such website.Smokeless Use & Health Issues - U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company It...
  10. N

    New ACSH publication - Helping Smokers Quit: The Science Behind Tobacco Harm Reduction

    Is there any truth in the allegation that Mr Rodu worked as consultant for smokeless tobacco companies?.
  11. N

    New ACSH publication - Helping Smokers Quit: The Science Behind Tobacco Harm Reduction

    Surprisingly No mention about Oral cancer risks of smokeless tobacco.It appears their earlier(THR) article about oral cancer risks has not found mention in this publication.
  12. N

    US Army falsely claims "Smokeless tobacco is as harmful as smoking tobacco"

    "Smokeless tobacco is as harmful as smoking tobacco.".. This statement would be incorrect if oral cancer is taken in to account.Chewing tobacco has much much higher risks with regards to oral cancer compared to smoking.I know well documented cases in india correlating oral cancer with...
  13. N

    Nosebleeds due to PG?

    There is a study on Inhaled PG causing nasal haemorrhage at concentration as low as 0.22%(In air). Ref: Subchronic nose-only inhalation study of p... [Food Chem Toxicol. 1989] - PubMed - NCBI
  14. N

    E-liquid lab/toxicology reports

    If it is already not given there is this fema list of flavor ingredients and their safe usage levels.FEMA GRAS
  15. N

    The misinformed teaching our youth

    I only got a pair and intend to keep them for some time to come :laugh:. Yep. and i think i said it in several different ways :closedeyes: . No.
  16. N

    The misinformed teaching our youth

    percentage wise,yes. It is not assumption on MY part.I provided the relevant data.Again this has no bearing on harm inflicted by cigarette smoking.Ejuice vapor doesnt have many of the harmful ingredients of cigarette smoke.Ejuice chemistry is entirely different.The only thing common is...
  17. N

    The misinformed teaching our youth

    There is nothing wrong in your observation.Your body apparently has no problem adjusting with eliquid ingredients. My post is with regards to the chemicals.
  18. N

    The misinformed teaching our youth

    Quantity of chemicals in cigarette are less than 2%.Coming to cigarette smoke vs vapor(Or Mist) the actual chemical content in ecig vapor is much much higher compared to cigarette smoke.Cigarette smoke is harmful because it contains carcinogens, particulate matter(Tar etc) and carbon...
  19. N

    “Study finds e-cigarettes affect airways, and quickly”

    There are a couple of studies on tobacco cigarette smoking that measured these same parameters which also resulted in small but significant changes.Whether these parameters are relevent or not is something the medical community has to apply their mind and educate people.
  20. N

    “Study finds e-cigarettes affect airways, and quickly”

    I am afraid that is how scientific investigations are reported.When you have some short term effects that mimic actual cigarette smoking the researcher can warn about potential longterm effects. That could be quite correct.The report should be useful for people who think ecigs are absolutely...
Top Bottom
Forums
Products
Vaping.com
Star Suppliers
Blogs
Menu