Wonder why the FDA would spend $270 million on these obviously biased studies?
I personally cost the government over $1,400/yr in taxes by NOT smoking.
Multiply that out to 1 million vapers...
That's $1.4 BILLION per year in lost revenue.
Vape-Pens are what people in So Cal call the devices used to vaporize "other" products that are available in California with a medical card... IF you know what I mean.
So that may not be the term we want to go with.
They say that... but their actions with regard to eCigs demonstrate a support for traditional cigarettes and tobacco companies.
The ACTUAL truth is that they need big tobacco, they have no interest in wiping it out. They would be destitute if they did.
Likewise, they have no interest in...
no need for a "data scientist" whatever that is.
This is just a standard API... any competent web developer could cull this for any data you want...
I happen to be a competent web developer ;)
And I just received my API key :)
What info do you want?
NOTE: this is going to have to be...
Well, as stated above... at least we now have a complete list of the most rabidly insane ANTZ.
Or in other words, a list of the biggest supporters of tobacco related disease and death. ;)
here's a copy-and-paste-able version of that link for anyone that wants it...
ww
w.p
opsci.c
om/article/science/fda-cal
culates-how-much-plea
sure-americans-lose-not-sm
oking
so basically...
Dautzenberg had an anti-eCig agenda, but his study's finding contradicted his beliefs, so he spun the Abstract to fit his preconceived notions?
I'm not really "in the know"...
But my guess is you're WAY off... because it wont even actually be read... just skimmed over, the summaries of each section lightly reviewed.
Sure Zeller may claim it costs the FDA $33m ... but that doesn't mean it does.
serious question... what was so hard about making that link:
ww
w.marketwatc
h.co
m/story/e-cigar
ettes-could-be-more-dang
erous-than-initially-thought-2014-06-09
that way it could just be copied and pasted... and still the link is broken?
Just sayin.
APNewsBreak: Firm seeks to say tobacco cuts risk
good news... if they manage to win.
Some takeaways from the article:
1. the modified risk application is over 100,000 pages long.
2. the author seems to have some cause/effect issues with regard to eCigs
3. eCigs mentioned... but only as a...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.