I need to correct what I said. FDA approved drug and pharmaceutical products are exempted. Also, there may be one company selling a very expensive cigalike which contains synthetic nicotine.
Lifeguards are, by nature, officious, and do not ordinarily read toxicology reports on the constituents of e-cig vapor. "Looks like smoke; don't do it" is about the extent of the "analysis" you're likely to get.
Even in a picture, the finish gives it a three dimensional appearance, as if you can see interesting features below the surface of the wood. It's fabulous and unusual and... well, I just can't stop looking at it.
The FDA will almost have to allow some sort of e-cigarette on the market. Otherwise, their claim that deeming isn't an outright ban will be an obvious lie. However, I'm not so sure the same applies to juice. The FDA is all about control, and the "problem" with e-juice is that it can be used in a...
The whole point of a lawsuit like this is to get an injunction. If you get a preliminary injunction, it pretty much means "game over," and the chances are very, very good that you'll get the permanent injunction. So, it's not a good sign if you don't get the PI.
Doesn't mean you might not...
I'd like to say "bye" to you as well, but I'll either need to stop reading this thread or figure out a way to "ignore this poster."
Bye. This balances out the marriage proposal I got in response to the last post I made on a legal matter.
Does this forum has an "ignore this poster" feature?
You said, "An injunction might not be a good thing anyway."
I replied, "A injunction would virtually guarantee a win for the plaintiff(s) at the district court level." I said I couldn't tell if you were being sarcastic.
You then said, "Listen to the bigshot lawyer FDA expert.
It might not be...
Stop fretting over the bathroom thing. Yes, we're all quite upset, but that's why we have a federal government--to deal with this important stuff and, uh... relieve us of such concerns.
All nicotine now on the market is derived from tobacco, and that will continue to be the case for the foreseeable future. Anything derived from tobacco is defined as a tobacco product by federal law.
On the contrary. A preliminary injunction would virtually guarantee a win for the plaintiff(s) at the district court level. But I can't tell if you're trying to be sarcastic. If so, please say so.I'd like to think I can easily hold my own in that kind of an exchange.
There are some bad judges, but most judge try their best to do the right thing and the entire judiciary is not corrupt. I know everyone is fed up, but please try not to overdo it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.