Search results

Hey all... Those of you who know/remember me are aware I vape 36-48 mg DIY. I'm now running out of NIC juice and my usual supplier isn't stocking anymore. Sigh. Is there a Canadian supplier that sells 60-100mg? (48 will do if I *have* to...) Cheers!

Hahaha. Good to know the cute, funny one is still here!

which I am wont to do from time to time... And who are all these people? :blink::blink:

My ears were burning...

The only one I ever wore:

Don't get me started on his toys... There is currently a chopper frame in the middle of my living room (he swears he's going to finish the damn thing and get it out in the next couple months... I'm not holding my breath). He has another 6 or 7 bikes in pieces in the basement. His Harley and...

Haha... That's what happened last night when I was comparing the Torch atty to the eGo T atty - I was using my iPhone as a flashlight. Kat took the Torch battery and turned on the flashlight for me. Show-off. I also apparently ended up with a Torch. My BF - WHO DOES NOT SMOKE OR VAPE - bought a...

It landed in the US a couple days ago... Cignot is one vendor I know about that is carrying them: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/cignot/175053-type-b-ego-t-atomizers-here.html#post2926739 The Type B Tank would look the same as the Type B XL atty - so cylindrical with a tank twice the...

I've just read that the eGo T atty now comes in the Type B style... so the tank holds 2ml. Is that close enough? ;)

Q Tips are your friends.

After two months of use, I have not yet had a tank cap get stuck in an atty. One other thing to note in addition to the suggestions listed: When I swap tanks, I almost always take the atty off of the battery first. My feeling is that this would negate any effects caused by air...

That is soooo not fair. I'm this close to going into full-out whining and stamping my feet mode.

What they say they want is proof that it is safe before they give it market authorization. ("Health Canada is committed to protecting the health of Canadians by ensuring that health products meet requirement for safety, efficacy and quality.") HC is not going to incur the costs of research on...

I get that and have seen both. Was simply referring to Rachel's post regarding the timeline of HC's and FDA's advisories. Just so I'm clear... What is the Catch 22, other than it being extremely time consuming and cost-prohibitive? My understanding, and I'll admit that I'm not that...

And for the record, since you brought me into it... albeit later deleted your comment... I agreed/laughed because Switched is not always biased. But I like that about him. I'm all for a good debate, as long as that's all it is.

Wow... c'mon boys... You're both pretty.

Agreed. Although FDA and HC have similar regulatory guidelines, there are some distinct differences. There are drugs that are approved in the US that are not in Canada, and vice versa. There are differences in the application and approval processes. Most importantly, and this reflects in the FDA...

I'm not worried.. just blaming you for not keeping me informed. I'm supposed to be in the know. :pervy:

Yeah... last post in that group was well over a year ago... and of the members, there's only one other than me that still posts here, and even then extremely rarely.