Search results

  1. M

    ECA vs FDA

    Hi TB, Unfortunately your right. The amount of hostility and bickering here, and the in your face aggresive posts is certaintly not helping the e-cig cause or this forum, and has really turned me off coming here as often or contributing. I remember when I first discovered this forum...
  2. M

    FDA Spokesperson Rita Chappelle Shoots Down Both the Device and The Nicotine For a Ban

    BINGO! This short term, get rich quick approach, that most, if not all e-cig manufacturers have taken, has seriously jeopardized the future of a potentially life saving smoking alternative. Mark
  3. M

    FDA Spokesperson Rita Chappelle Shoots Down Both the Device and The Nicotine For a Ban

    Hi Ludo, In all fairness it's rather hard to believe that you thought that there were no rules governing the manufacture and distribution of new products (which includes e-cigarettes). It seems pretty clear to me -and I'm no business major, that if I wanted to manufacture and sell a...
  4. M

    Health Canada announcement

    Hi Nuck, Approx. a year ago I did some investigation into making my own e-liquid. Upon checking two different catalogs from lab grade supplier's they both stated their nicotine solution shelf life was only 6 months. After that, who knows? Perhaps the nicotine looses its potency...
  5. M

    Another newspaper warning

    Hi TB, You hit the nail on the head. Anyone who has taken an introduction course to business would realize that a product like this is going to need government approval. Electronic cigarette manufacturers dropped the ball and let us all down by not going through the proper channels...
  6. M

    Health Canada announcement

    Health Canada released an anticipated comment today which included, the rather gloomy -although anticipated response; "Persons importing, advertising or selling electronic cigarette products in Canada must stop doing so immediately. Health Canada is providing information to interested...
  7. M

    Why shouldn't the FDA interfere?

    BINGO! Gold star for you Kate! We don't know what these concoctions will do to us in the long term. Hopefully though, through a proper scientific evaluation we can. In my eyes if a company can fund to have a product researched, engineered, produced, and marketed ,they can pay to ensure that its...
  8. M

    Why shouldn't the FDA interfere?

    Disman, I'm not going to play this silly game. If you have a link share it with us. The point I made was not with "corn flakes" it was with some of the ingredients in it like preservatives. Mark
  9. M

    Why shouldn't the FDA interfere?

    Hi Kate, I agree. I'm currently in a transition phase between tradional cigs and e-smoking and I would hate to loose the use of my e-cig. Having said that I recognize the importance of the FDA, Health Canada, ect... in ensuring that products released to the general public are indeed...
  10. M

    Why shouldn't the FDA interfere?

    Hi DisMan, Please provide the link to your source? The only studies I've read so far do not include long term exposure. Perhaps I missed this one. Thanks. Mark
  11. M

    Why shouldn't the FDA interfere?

    Hi Kate, I commend you on your stand on animal testing. It's a contentious issue and I'm glad that it's not used as frivolously as it once was used by such groups like the cosmetic industry. Unfortunatly, it's my understanding, that certain medical analisys cannot be determined...
  12. M

    Why shouldn't the FDA interfere?

    Hi DisMan, Although I don't have a box of Cornflakes handy I'm pretty confident in stating that more than corn is listed under its ingredients. There are probably such items as perservatives, artificial agents, colouring, ect... Which have required government testing...
  13. M

    Why shouldn't the FDA interfere?

    Hi Kate, I don't claim to be a research scientist or the like, but I would imagine that it would be tested under controlled conditions, would include chemical and gas analisys. And probably involve animal testing. Mark
  14. M

    Why shouldn't the FDA interfere?

    Hi Kate, I value your input here but I can't say I agree with allowing people to become human guinea pigs in testing a new product. As much as we enjoy our new smoking alternative we simply don't know the long term health affects. Odds are they're better than traditional cigarettes...
  15. M

    Fda crackdown looms

    Hi Brian, As optimistic as I am about e-cigs there has been no long term studies on its safety. With TCs (traditional cigarettes) I suspect there wasn't anyone who got lung cancer after smoking them for only a few years. We need e-cig manufacturers to act now and get more health...
  16. M

    EU E-Cig Called “Highly Toxic”–UK Urged to Regulate

    Hmmm, The link didn't work for me either.... Mark
  17. M

    Canada also cracking down

    Hi Jhamer, I hope you'r right.
  18. M

    Canada also cracking down

    I read an interesting article in the Toronto Star newspaper (one of Toronto's major newspapers). The following quote -although somewhat expected, was rather disheartning. "Health Canada determined last month that they (e-cigarettes) fall under the Food and Drugs Act, which means a company...
  19. M

    Add your support to a Canadian e-cig Poll....

    Hi Greg, Thanks for the heads up. I put in my 2 cents. Mark