......but that would only make sense if all the reviews were positive and they aren't. The whole essence of your reply makes it sound dishonest and I don't believe all are like that...without reviews we would waste money and we are all bright enough to work out the bad reviewers..
Who was the bad reviewer? I'm new to this forum and would like that info please. Scotts reviews have always been upfront and honest, he's even helped me out when I had an issue with a product he's reviewed so you can't get more hones than that in my book...
Cheers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.