Because too many people have tried to explain it, and each time there's a slight variation.
~Lannie
Maybe that is why?
Because too many people have tried to explain it, and each time there's a slight variation.
~Lannie
I think what they were trying to say as an example is that you have one person who's been there for a while or really busts their .... for the company and they're being paid $65k a year. Then you have a second person who basically shows up and collects a paycheck and leaves as soon as the workday ends. Maybe they're new, or maybe they've been there a while and have had terrible performance reviews, so they're being paid $50k a year. Now they are both being paid $70k. While the good performer should be happy in getting a $5k a year raise, I can see their frustration. Why should they kill themselves working hard when the slacker did nothing and they get a larger raise?I am not sure how I feel about this. On one hand it does seem unfair to the ones with seniority but I tend to think I would be happy for those that got the raise. I think most people that are hard workers are that way instinctively and don't always look at the work/reward as a basis for their hard work. If this was true we would see nobody wanting to work in labor intensive/ lower paying jobs. Some companies have the biggest slackers in the highest position because they are family. BTW, no I am not for the "trophies for all" sentiment, but business has always been pretty lopsided when it comes to work/reward. When I was a chef, I found out a gal I had just interviewed to help me out started at $2 more an hour then I made yet I was still considered above her in position for that kitchen. I remember talking it out with my husband and at first feeling a bit slighted but he pointed out that the owner probably saw that she had three children to support and made an offer that was suited to her. He also pointed out to me that I always have the power to renegotiate my rate of pay if I felt I should. I thought about it then decided before I knew her rate I was completely satisfied with mine so why should what she gets effect how I do my work. I have always believed that ones rate of pay should be a private issue for reasons like this.
Ooooo look at me at one year in !!!!Time to celebrate!
I really haven't been following the contests much.....at least until Red started winning EVERYTHING in sight.I have several pages yet to catch up on, but that whining and arguing is why I stopped doing the other contests. There was such a KERFUFFLE over Rich winning that stupid Butterbeer. I didn't want to be the next target and decided I don't need free juice bad enough to risk it, so I quit. I figured if I won something, then there'd be whining that Rich and I are married and we shouldn't BOTH be entering, or some such BS. Life's too short, ya know?
~Lannie

I have several pages yet to catch up on, but that whining and arguing is why I stopped doing the other contests. There was such a KERFUFFLE over Rich winning that stupid Butterbeer. I didn't want to be the next target and decided I don't need free juice bad enough to risk it, so I quit. I figured if I won something, then there'd be whining that Rich and I are married and we shouldn't BOTH be entering, or some such BS. Life's too short, ya know?
~Lannie
I really haven't been following the contests much.....at least until Red started winning EVERYTHING in sight.
What's this Butterbeer?
FWIW, with this last Disrupter quick draw, I can definitely see it devolving into complaints. Knowing that Innokin is going to select the winning answers instead of using random.org, I can definitely see some complaining "why did his answer get selected and not mine? " coming down the pike. And then you will also have people dissect the answers, putting their two cents as to whose answers are better.
I do not understand why someone would even care if you and him both won....it is just ridiculous. You both are 2 different people, and should not be treated as 1 because your married. I sometimes think it is greed....they spend so much time worrying about what others have or get. Its a freakin contest for goodness sake....
I have mixed feelings about this. I understand that ability, work ethics, etc. are not the only criteria for pay rate. But when nobody knows what anyone else is getting paid, it's hard to know if the company is cheating you.
Working for one convenience store (not the wonderful one I mentioned above), we hired a guy part-time. He owned a failing business and needed the extra income. I was the assistant mgr at the time and he was a part-time clerk.
He came in the store to cash his check, and it didn't take 2 seconds of figuring in my head to realize his hourly rate was significantly higher than mine! I complained to the supervisor, who told me "Well, he's a man. He has a family to support so he needs more money!" And this was a WOMAN who told me this.
I called the corporate office to complain, and the company owner visited me at the store the next day. He apologized profusely, and gave me a retroactive raise back to the day the part-time clerk was hired. I left it at that, but I know he did that to prevent a sexual discrimination lawsuit. I think I could have won such a case.
I raised my daughter mostly by myself, with only occasional financial help from elsewhere (I was on welfare for about 3 months once.) But that fact should be irrelevant - I should be paid according to the work I do - better work, better pay. Period. It irks me to no end all of the times I worked at companies who paid men better than women who were doing the same work, sometimes even doing it better or taking on even more responsibilities.
EDIT : abbreviation for assistant triggered the cuss-filter!!

I am struggling to come up with dinner as well for today. I am tired of the same old same old.I have no plans for today.
No idea what is for dinner yet. Maybe something with chicken? BBq'd? Corn on the cob?
Cheesey rice?
I think we'll just go out for dinner. I don't feel like cooking.I am struggling to come up with dinner as well for today. I am tired of the same old same old.
I think what they were trying to say as an example is that you have one person who's been there for a while or really busts their .... for the company and they're being paid $65k a year. Then you have a second person who basically shows up and collects a paycheck and leaves as soon as the workday ends. Maybe they're new, or maybe they've been there a while and have had terrible performance reviews, so they're being paid $50k a year. Now they are both being paid $70k. While the good performer should be happy in getting a $5k a year raise, I can see their frustration. Why should they kill themselves working hard when the slacker did nothing and they get a larger raise?
I am struggling to come up with dinner as well for today. I am tired of the same old same old.
I really haven't been following the contests much.....at least until Red started winning EVERYTHING in sight.
What's this Butterbeer?
FWIW, with this last Disrupter quick draw, I can definitely see it devolving into complaints. Knowing that Innokin is going to select the winning answers instead of using random.org, I can definitely see some complaining "why did his answer get selected and not mine? " coming down the pike. And then you will also have people dissect the answers, putting their two cents as to whose answers are better.
I hear that!!! what do you have in the fridge/freezer? Maybe I can come up with something creative?
Lannie, That is soo not right. IMO the vendors should disqualify people like that from future contests.
Thank you for the offer. I actually handed the cooking reigns over to my daughter tonight. Pluses of a multigenerational home.![]()
He came in the store to cash his check, and it didn't take 2 seconds of figuring in my head to realize his hourly rate was significantly higher than mine! I complained to the supervisor, who told me "Well, he's a man. He has a family to support so he needs more money!" And this was a WOMAN who told me this.
I pm'd you one of my favorite recipes.I have no plans for today.
No idea what is for dinner yet. Maybe something with chicken? BBq'd? Corn on the cob?
Cheesey rice?
Bahhhhh...enter all you want!I have several pages yet to catch up on, but that whining and arguing is why I stopped doing the other contests. There was such a KERFUFFLE over Rich winning that stupid Butterbeer. I didn't want to be the next target and decided I don't need free juice bad enough to risk it, so I quit. I figured if I won something, then there'd be whining that Rich and I are married and we shouldn't BOTH be entering, or some such BS. Life's too short, ya know?
~Lannie
Lmaooo...not everything....I do have my eye on some more juice, though...lmaooooo...and as for Innokin, during the round I won, I know they read the answers based on a comment in response to my answer in my "congrats" PM from them. I put some thought into it, and i believe i had given a good answer, And i saw a lot pf GOOD answers. But all the ppl complaining that the winning answers sucked and they got cheated kind of bothered me. I liked my answer, and they liked my answer. I just got lucky this time. The Lakeshore Vapors package...my name got drawn out of a hat. No skill involved whatsoever.....I really haven't been following the contests much.....at least until Red started winning EVERYTHING in sight.
What's this Butterbeer?
FWIW, with this last Disrupter quick draw, I can definitely see it devolving into complaints. Knowing that Innokin is going to select the winning answers instead of using random.org, I can definitely see some complaining "why did his answer get selected and not mine? " coming down the pike. And then you will also have people dissect the answers, putting their two cents as to whose answers are better.
Sign up for UPS My Choice, then UPS will send an email out a few days before. I got to watch the tracking from Alaska to my front door...lolOh no!! That's what I'm worried about - I don't care how long it takes them to ship it, but I need to watch it or it might get delivered to the wrong house and I wouldn't know! Some of my neighbors would bring it over. Others? I dunno.
When I started in public accounting with Ernst & Young (this was back in 1990) as a first year staff accountant, I was hired on at a base salary of $27,500 in California. During new staff tax training, there were new hires from all over the country. This was my first introduction to regional differences in salary. One of the other new hires was from the office in Arkansas (or Alabama) and even with a master's degree in taxation (master's degrees started out at a higher salary), he was making $21,000 a year. Of course, the cost of living in the SF bay area is considerably higher than the cost of living in the south, so the difference is understandable.Oh, wow, this same thing happened to me once, too. I was working in an accounting-type position at a subsidiary of Cargill Grain (my job was to keep track of all the grain cars - rail cars, I mean - of each type of grain coming in and going out so we knew how much was in the elevators at any given time). Well, I did a very good job, never made mistakes, and had a good work ethic, and got a promotion to the next level up, which made me very happy. The promotion came with a raise, from $500 a month to $550 a month. Yeah, it was back in the late 70s.The company hired a guy (a 23 year old guy) to fill my old position, and I spent a week or so training him. He was a total screw-up, constantly entering stuff in the wrong book (there were no computers back then, everything was hand-entered in paper books) and making mistakes that I had to clean up later. Finally, they told me I'd trained him enough and I could go start my new position. A couple of weeks after that, someone let slip that the new kid was making $800 to START, which was $300 more a month than I'd been making, doing twice the work with no mistakes. I was livid. When I went to my boss to find out what the heck the deal was, he said the exact same thing: "Well, he's married and has a wife to support." AND I DIDN'T? At the time, I was married to ex-husband #1, who was a total doofus, and couldn't keep a job for more than a month, and had been unemployed for the previous SIX months, and we were living on just my income. So I quit. Right then and there. Picked up my stuff and went home.
The boss called me at home later that evening and asked if I'd please come back, and he'd give me another $50 a month raise (up to $600 a month). I said no, and unless he could give me $850 a month, he could find himself another lackey. And you know what? He said, "OK, sorry we couldn't come to an agreement." What an AZZ! The good news was that within just a couple of days, I'd gotten a BETTER job, paid $775 a month, BUT, I didn't have to drive all the way downtown and pay for parking, so I was netting way more than the $800 the replacement guy was making.
Another time, when I was looking for work (can't remember exactly when it was, but I think before that debacle I just described), I applied at some company and the poor guy that interviewed me said I was PERFECT for the job, but he couldn't hire me because I was white and not pregnant. Really. He actually said that. Sometimes you just have to shake your head and wonder...
~Lannie