510 E- Pipe

Status
Not open for further replies.

rtfm

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 13, 2010
113
4
USA
Looks nice, I assume the action to operate is the copper contact at the bowl, do you have a site to sell them from? If not perhaps approach a select few of the bigger sites for a partnership (consignment/percentage/wholesale).

What do they typically sell for?
Would you consider making one to work with the popularity growing ego-t atty?
 

romaniac

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 21, 2009
182
218
Las Vegas, USA
www.jazzcartopipe.com
Depending on the response i get from this i will decide to have the website done. it takes about 4 hours for me to make one and my price will be about $120 including shipping. I do not sell batteries or cartomizers. I have been testing the pipes successfully with UltraFire 18350 and GTL 123a 3.7v batteries. I recommend strongly the 18350 protected batteries from MadVape Yes i will have in the future a model using a fiber less tank like the ego-t but right now i will stick with the 510 cartomizer and i can also make them for a KR808D-1 cartomizer . I prefer the 510 for a better taste
 

romaniac

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 21, 2009
182
218
Las Vegas, USA
www.jazzcartopipe.com
I am testing one of the pipes with a atomizer similar with the Ego T. Not sure if this was designed before or after the Ego T but i am working with them for 2 3 weeks now. is small 8.8 mm diameter and has a fiber-less tank just like the ego t but smaller. my prototype works well but the cartridge is small .6 ml i am working at making a longer cartridge.
 

devnull71

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 16, 2010
152
11
54
San Mateo, CA
I'm very interested. I've been looking at e-pipes, and would prefer something with a manual switch and a serviceable atomizer. The ProtoPipe is far too large, and I've been waiting to see what the new EPipeMods single-battery model will cost.

If this is designed to take a 510 carto, can I assume it will also work with a standard 510 atty/cartridge? I'll be watching this thread, would love to see the details when you get a site up. Very nice!
 

romaniac

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 21, 2009
182
218
Las Vegas, USA
www.jazzcartopipe.com
I'm very interested. I've been looking at e-pipes, and would prefer something with a manual switch and a serviceable atomizer. The ProtoPipe is far too large, and I've been waiting to see what the new EPipeMods single-battery model will cost.

If this is designed to take a 510 carto, can I assume it will also work with a standard 510 atty/cartridge? I'll be watching this thread, would love to see the details when you get a site up. Very nice!

For this particular model pipe no atomizers except the new ego-t style 8.7 mm atomizer can fiber less tank (tank is only .6ml)
but it can be made with a XL cartomizer including the CE2R4 XL. It has to be custom made for either a regular size cartomizer or an XL. so You will have to specify what you prefer at the time you will place the order If you decide to order one.

Thank you for your interest and feedback
 
Last edited:

romaniac

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 21, 2009
182
218
Las Vegas, USA
www.jazzcartopipe.com
View attachment 29415
I would like to see some form of cover over the battery, to stop water ingress, but other than that looks great.

In the near future there will be a cover available very simple but effective. i personally prefer use it without but i understand that not all vapers live in Las Vegas :)

Thank you for your interest and feedback
 

arjay55

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 25, 2010
815
469
- ɹəpun uʍop -
I think you are on a winner there romaniac. (Get the Las Vegas reference lol ).

Jokes aside I really like the idea of an XL CE2 model (as I still have about 70 of them).

The new eGo-T would be good too, but it may suffer from the same problem I find the '601' pipe has. The atomizer is too far from the mouthpiece on the '601' and there is no heat in the vapour by the time it gets to your mouth. I also find there is no flavour by the '601' and I am not sure if that is caused by the distance traveled and the lack of heat.

I too would like a better setup for the manual button, preferably where your thumb could rest on it, therefore covering it from view during use. But I do see where your design is more straightforward and probably less prone to failure.

I will be watching for further developments with interest.
 

romaniac

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 21, 2009
182
218
Las Vegas, USA
www.jazzcartopipe.com
I think you are on a winner there romaniac. (Get the Las Vegas reference lol ).

Jokes aside I really like the idea of an XL CE2 model (as I still have about 70 of them).

The new eGo-T would be good too, but it may suffer from the same problem I find the '601' pipe has. The atomizer is too far from the mouthpiece on the '601' and there is no heat in the vapour by the time it gets to your mouth. I also find there is no flavour by the '601' and I am not sure if that is caused by the distance traveled and the lack of heat.

I too would like a better setup for the manual button, preferably where your thumb could rest on it, therefore covering it from view during use. But I do see where your design is more straightforward and probably less prone to failure.

I will be watching for further developments with interest.

Thank you for your interest and feedback. I have one of the pipes running on the Ego T system a little smaller cousin of it is 8.7 mm diameter and the vapor production is good. but like any atomizer if you use it continuously has the same overcooked juice taste. The best results i had is with a low resistance Boge cartomizer. Mouthfuls of thick and delicious vapor and for some reasons i get much longer use of each cartomizer compared to the conventional ego/vgo batteries.

You are right the final design was chosen with one goal in mind NO FAILURE!! Made in USA is not just a slogan but a promise of dependability. I use to love smoking pipes and one characteristic of pipe smoking is the feel of a real beautiful wood pipe. it was very hard to keep a realistic proportion of a pipe and still keep the functionality at best level possible. the button placement is much more natural than you think. But you will have to try it to better understand .

Thank you again for your interest and feedback
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread