• Need help from former MFS (MyFreedomSmokes) customers

    Has any found a supplier or company that has tobacco e-juice like or very similar to MFS Turbosmog, Tall Paul, or Red Luck?

    View thread

FDA 8/8/14 Comment/Letter to FDA by 29 state attorneys general

Status
Not open for further replies.

choochoogranny

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 21, 2013
9,091
35,619
chattanooga, tn, usa
The TN Attorney General and Reporter is Robert E. Cooper, Jr. who signed another letter back in 2013 supporting other proposed legislations against ecig sales. He is up for re-election this year. Maybe I'll just remind him of that as well as tell him I belong to the Scenic City Vapers Club (membership over 1800), will let know his views to the over 1800 members in the Smokey Mountain Vapers Club, Knoxville, put his views on Scenic City's Facebook page, THEN bring it up at the next vape meet (400-600 people attend) AND possibly even get it well known at the vapers' convention to be held here in Chattanooga early Oct.! :mad:

Think that'll pique his interest?
 

aubergine

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 22, 2010
2,467
1,994
MD
Racehorse: "What I can't figure out is that the majority of people here refer to themselves as tea party types or Libertarians. Yet, this stuff goes on.......

It's not just vaping......."

I know why. But to get into it in here invites tangential conversations that are both infuriating and futile. It's odious, noxious and incessant and has deeply irritated a LOT of people. They've left this part of the forum, or don't bother to speak up. This allows that contingent to somewhat control the underlying political narrative here, and to imagine that opposition to the regulation of ecigs is only coherent and defensible as a right-wing "libertarian" cause. They really don't get it, won't get it, and that's the way it is.
They also won't acknowledge that that's the case.
Since they're on the right side vis a vis vaping, I bite my tongue much more often than not. I'm an old lefty activist and can soldier on with anyone who supports a cause I care about. The constant jabs and stereotyping doesn't bother apolitical persons in here, and that's fine.
If a TP person who bought that whole package except for gay rights, who was passionate about gay rights, were to wander into a forum in which socialists had seized that issue as emblematic of their whole agenda, it'd be a similar discomfiture. All political groups define "rights" only around their particular preferences, and always at the expense of other rights. To pretend otherwise is smoke and mirrors.

Just remember that quitting smoking is not a partisan project, that it's fair to assume that if we're at all representative of the general populace here then the majority of us here are actually not sympathetic to right wing libertarian ideology, that that contingent habitually and casually demonizes and misrepresents anyone not in their camp, in here as elsewhere, and, as one person (a very bright and articulate activist for this cause, who quit the forum) said, they're constitutionally unable and unwilling to stop pressing their whole package of talking points, and assume that everyone who disagrees is either a moronic political illiterate or a witting tyrant.

Sad that the old hatred of hippies, with attendant WAY off stereotype, and that whole musty cultural divide, should emerge in here too, though. I had to require myself to delete a very lengthy rejoinder. To somehow imagine those prim and authoritarian ANTZ as ex-hippies gave me a wondrous good laugh though; laughter is saving.
 
Last edited:

samcm010

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 4, 2013
529
754
Ashburn Virginia USA
The TN Attorney General and Reporter is Robert E. Cooper, Jr. who signed another letter back in 2013 supporting other proposed legislations against ecig sales. He is up for re-election this year. Maybe I'll just remind him of that as well as tell him I belong to the Scenic City Vapers Club (membership over 1800), will let know his views to the over 1800 members in the Smokey Mountain Vapers Club, Knoxville, put his views on Scenic City's Facebook page, THEN bring it up at the next vape meet (400-600 people attend) AND possibly even get it well known at the vapers' convention to be held here in Chattanooga early Oct.! :mad:

Think that'll pique his interest?
If you could pull that off I would certainly think it would create some attention.
 

SeniorBoy

VapeFight.com Founder
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 21, 2013
1,735
5,124
Las Vegas, NV
vapefight.com
As I'm sure most know, Pink Spot Vapors here in Vegas is huge. I just posted the following to their Facebook page:

"Hello Pink Spot Vapors. OUR NV AG (Catherine Cortez Masto) wants to BAN ALL FLAVORS other than tobacco and menthol. "Recommendations: We urge the FDA to ban all characterizing flavors other than tobacco and menthol in newly deemed tobacco products."

"As used in this section, flavored tobacco products include e-cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, hookah tobacco, gels, and dissolvables, all of which should be made subject to the Section 907 ban on any characterizing flavor other than tobacco and menthol. Our use of the term characterizing flavors throughout this Comment refers to all characterizing flavors other than tobacco and menthol."

The letter to the FDA which she signed: http://www.ag.ny.gov/pdfs/FINAL_AG_FDA_Comment_Re_Deeming_Regulations.pdf Plenty of other deplorable stuff in the letter. PLEASE voice your opposition via http://ag.nv.gov/Contact/Contact/ "
 

choochoogranny

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 21, 2013
9,091
35,619
chattanooga, tn, usa
Okay, I was wrong about the TN Atty Gen being re-elected. This is one state where the TN Supreme Court appoints for 8 yrs. the Atty Gen. The TN Supreme Court is elected after their 8 yr terms are up. Of the 5 Justices, 3 were up for re-election. They all just won another 8 yrs. having fought a battle against a Republican led challenge.

Do I still write to the Atty Gen. and/or to the individual justices of the TN Supreme Court? :confused:
 

greyfox

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Apr 3, 2010
135
129
47
Let's keep hippies, yuppies, tea parties, political parties, political views out of here please, such discussions are for the Outside and not applicable or beneficial to this thread.

I couldn't disagree more. By their very nature the regulations we are fighting against are political. By not allowing in depth discussion you essentially limit every post to an infantile ..... session over how much we hate the regs, which is utterly pointless in my opinion and resolves nothing. To understand the situation fully and then educate others on this issue, political discourse is not only relevant but necessary. There are bound to be disagreements but we are all adults here and we have moderated ourselves quite nicely without interference so far, despite coming from all ends of the political spectrum. The entire point to this fight is to join together as vapers, understand each other's views and work as a cohesive whole.
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
59,875
NW Ohio US
I couldn't disagree more. By their very nature the regulations we are fighting against are political..

jayrock.gif


john-kerry-tom-harkin-ortega-01b.jpg


They would agree.....
 

Gato del Jugo

ProVarinati
ECF Veteran
Dec 24, 2013
2,568
3,450
US o' A

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
59,875
NW Ohio US
When posting a photo of Senator Jay "Sweet Tooth" Rockefeller, aka, Supplier & Personal Financier of the Official Senate Candy Desk, we kindly ask that you consider using the suggested "Promoter of Highly-Addictive Caffeine-Laced Flavored Sugar-Water Marketed to Young Children" version, instead..


Thank you for your time & cooperation...


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XsKVgbhqk...A2E/02_4CiUIJiE/s1600/granndy+rockefeller.jpg

View attachment 363772

That was from his Peace Corps days.....
 

aubergine

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 22, 2010
2,467
1,994
MD
snip ...we have moderated ourselves quite nicely without interference so far, despite coming from all ends of the political spectrum. The entire point to this fight is to join together as vapers, understand each other's views and work as a cohesive whole.

The first point is untrue - this forum has always had excellent and active moderation, and that's why it's remained a user friendly locale for persons from a broad spectrum and with very different views on many things.
It shouldn't become anyone's platform - not mine and not yours - for airing general and highly controversial political grievances and opinion not directly related to e-cigarettes. It's easy to say that it's all connected - I could do that from my position, too - but then people who come here for information and mutual support in fighting this battle would get treated to pages and pages of the heated and often hateful partisan commentary from both sides on everything from gun control to Palestine that's very familiar in un-moderated forums. (Unless one side were content to just shut up.) There's Outside for that.

It's quite true that people who have come together here to work together in support of this product often disagree on all sorts of other hot issues. To the extent that those are frequently and vehemently remarked upon in here, especially when fellow vapers are severely maligned by inference, your second excellent point is compromised.
Take away the moderators and, for instance, Kent and I can have at it in every thread until no one wants to be here any more except those that love a big partisan debate. That's for another venue. If he's free to advance his political opinion at length, then I must be too, to the detriment of the focus and function of this forum. So we're required to not do that. Good.

Without even-handed forum moderation, people WILL leave, or feel alienated, because they don't come here to argue about a hundred highly charged and controversial issues. They're our fellow vapers, and they want to know what's going on with this particular issue, and what to do about it, within a welcoming and inclusive movement.

If the right is permitted to speak freely and extraneously, then the left must be allowed to do the same. That was my point in writing the above. And I think that it all, including my post, belongs elsewhere.
 
Last edited:

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
59,875
NW Ohio US
If he's free to advance his political opinion at length, then I must be too,

In almost every instance, (and I have made a point to point this out on occasions) 'he' has replied to an former partisan comment. So 'he' holds the same stance - if x is free to advance his or her political opinion here, then I must be too.
 

aubergine

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 22, 2010
2,467
1,994
MD
In almost every instance, (and I have made a point to point this out on occasions) 'he' has replied to an former partisan comment. So 'he' holds the same stance - if x is free to advance his or her political opinion here, then I must be too.

I wrote "That's for another venue. If he's free to advance his political opinion at length, then I must be too, to the detriment of the focus and function of this forum. So we're required to not do that. Good. "


My point is that neither 'he', nor me, nor us nor they ought to be free to do so, except as regards the issue at hand explicitly, especially not regarding divisive extraneous issues and ideologies, and that it's not in accordance with excellent ECF guidelines so to do. So, enough. :)

Meanwhile, there are people like these odious and apparently insane attorneys general, for whom we might want to reserve our collective spleen and activist energy in here.
 
Last edited:

SeniorBoy

VapeFight.com Founder
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 21, 2013
1,735
5,124
Las Vegas, NV
vapefight.com
Thank You for posting this SeniorBoy.

You welcome :) When I started this thread it was my hope and desire to learn from each other about the various sections of the letter, share experiences in how we took action with respect to this letter, and of course read about additional activism that would result in direct response to this letter. Frankly and respectfully, this "fight" can get a little lonely so I need real stories of how others took action to keep my spirits up.

When "we" venture to far off the beaten path so to speak is when I tap out and request that the thread be locked, which goes to the point classwife made and a few others. On the other hand, please start your own thread in Outside and I will be happy to debate the "politics" of the FDA going back 15 or 20 years based on my own extensive but flawed studies. :)

Returning to the topic: I just took a quick look and I'm unable to find any favorable analysis of this letter in the media. Lots of regurgitation but nothing approaching a rebuttal of any sort. If you found this, please post the link.
 
Last edited:

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
59,875
NW Ohio US
My point is that neither 'he', me nor us nor they ought to, and that it's not in accordance with excellent ECF guidelines so to do. So, enough. :)

Once again, if you or other repeat offenders, don't mention politics, you don't hear much from me. I will, as an explanation of a point of regulation, when it is pertinent, mention some things that some might not want to hear, but are definitely on subject or add to the context of the subject - my comment on gun control, for example, was one of those instances with no intent or display of actually arguing anything on that subject whatsoever. It was beneath, even you, to mention it in the context that you did, as if it was being argued, which it wasn't, and anyone here who read my original comment would have to agree. I was showing how one AG - DeWine - isn't worth voting for. Something that you likely would support, yet you took that comment and described it as "partisan politics", which it was not. So in your 'call for enough' you can't even restrain yourself from taking political pot shots :facepalm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread