I wrote to American Airlines requesting an explanation of their ban on using e-cigs during flights. Here is their response:
"Thank you for your comments about electronic cigarettes. While we do permit passengers to carry electronic cigarettes aboard, their activation is prohibited. Currently, there are unresolved health and safety concerns that prevent the use of electronic cigarettes on our flights.
Among these concerns, this product has not been tested to ensure that it doesn't emit an excess of RF energy (which could interfere with onboard systems) while used in an aircraft cabin. Additionally, the effects of propylene glycol mist (which this product emits) being disbursed throughout a compressed cabin have not been examined.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to address this matter. I hope that you will agree that the safety of our passengers and crew should always be our top priority."
Whether or not we like the decision, I'm appreciative that my letter didn't go into a junk pile (I wasn't sure I would get any response). It does show that they have at least looked into it enough to have specific concerns, rather than the 'ban it just because its like a cigarette' sentiment we see too much of.
I'm going to reply with a thank you and inquire whether the airline is now, or is planning to investigate their concerns.
I'm also going to make a copy of the letter and keep it in my carry-on bag. On the off-chance that I ever have a problem going through security with a TSA agent unfamiliar with e-cigs, it might be helpful to be able to show them that it's allowed to be carried onto the plane.
"Thank you for your comments about electronic cigarettes. While we do permit passengers to carry electronic cigarettes aboard, their activation is prohibited. Currently, there are unresolved health and safety concerns that prevent the use of electronic cigarettes on our flights.
Among these concerns, this product has not been tested to ensure that it doesn't emit an excess of RF energy (which could interfere with onboard systems) while used in an aircraft cabin. Additionally, the effects of propylene glycol mist (which this product emits) being disbursed throughout a compressed cabin have not been examined.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to address this matter. I hope that you will agree that the safety of our passengers and crew should always be our top priority."
Whether or not we like the decision, I'm appreciative that my letter didn't go into a junk pile (I wasn't sure I would get any response). It does show that they have at least looked into it enough to have specific concerns, rather than the 'ban it just because its like a cigarette' sentiment we see too much of.
I'm going to reply with a thank you and inquire whether the airline is now, or is planning to investigate their concerns.
I'm also going to make a copy of the letter and keep it in my carry-on bag. On the off-chance that I ever have a problem going through security with a TSA agent unfamiliar with e-cigs, it might be helpful to be able to show them that it's allowed to be carried onto the plane.
Last edited: