Are super caps doable?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mogur

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 24, 2009
192
9
Whidbey Island, WA
Just thinking aloud. Hoping for some feedback from experts on whether I am out there in left field.

Super caps are now available that are less than $5 for 10 farads @ 2.5 volts. 13x33.5mm for this one at sparkfun-
supercapsparkfun.jpg


For a rough guestimate, supers have about 1/25th the energy density of batteries so, worse case, you should be able to get a puff off of a super cap that is the same size as a battery that can last for 100 puffs, assuming only half the super caps energy is available, and a 50% efficiency loss in the boost converter to get the volts up and maintained.

But let me venture out of my comfort zone and do the math.

Energy = (1/2)*Capacitance*(Voltage2)
Energy = .5*10*(1.252) = 7.8 joules, assuming that only 50% of the capacitor's energy is available.

Then, for a four second hit at 4 volts-
Energy = Voltage*Amperage*Time, or A = J/(V*T), and
Amps = 7.8/(4*4), or A = .49 amps

Errr, need maybe a little more current for a good vape. 20 farads should do, but the order of magnitude is right, and could use some experimenting.

What's the point? Why screw with a battery system that works fine and why complicate the electronics? Because we can. And because the voltage would be constant and consistent from hit to hit, with a reduced chance of burning up the atomizer, since total energy available to the coil is a fixed amount every time.

Other reasons are that the super cap cycle lifespan is virtually infinite; they have a huge power density (ability to output current) compared to batteries; recharge in a few seconds (thus, no downtime for battery charging/changing); and they are great to brag about in a cigar vapor filled room. At home they could be recharged by induction in an electric toothbrush style cradle, and on the road by a PCC carried in the same pocket.

PS edit: As a battery loses its charge, the vape gets poorer and poorer. Not that desirable. But the super cap will fade as its charge is depleted on every hit. That can be a good thing because near the end of the hit, as the coil dries out, you really don't want full current to overheat the coil to destruction, rather just enough to vape the residual juice. But, from the first hit to the thousandth, a super cap will always perform identically.
 
Last edited:

e-pipeman

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 16, 2008
5,430
5,594
Brown Edge, England
Sorry for being dense, but I'm a bit confused about the way in which supercaps fade as opposed to batteries. You're saying on the one hand that "from the first hit to the thousandth, a super cap will always perform identically." and on the other "But the super cap will fade as its charge is depleted on every hit.". These two things don't seem similar to me. I'm sorry to be crass but a little clarification would certainly help me out!
 

mogur

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 24, 2009
192
9
Whidbey Island, WA
Sorry for being dense, but I'm a bit confused about the way in which supercaps fade as opposed to batteries. You're saying on the one hand that "from the first hit to the thousandth, a super cap will always perform identically." and on the other "But the super cap will fade as its charge is depleted on every hit.". These two things don't seem similar to me. I'm sorry to be crass but a little clarification would certainly help me out!

Crass? Give me some grog and I'll show ya crass! Yeah, I was a little obtuse, there. Batteries are like an old wild-west water tower. They hold a lot of water when finally filled up, although very slowly, from say a windmill well pump through a small diameter pipe. When a train shows up, and needs to replenish the boiler water, a larger tube is folded down to supply the water at a decent rate. (This is the vaping analogy, the battery charging analogy was the windmill pump filling, btw.) As the water tower is emptied, though, the time it takes to fill up a train increases because the water pressure (electrical voltage) decreases. When you get tired of waiting, you have to fill the water tower again (but if the wind isn't blowing, too bad). A super cap is like a huge bucket that you fill from the water tower in between trains. When a train shows up, you can hit it hard (fill it fast) with that bucket, because it has a huge output orfice. But it has a limited supply, so that if you size the bucket to just what the train typically needs, then you have consistent delivery, and as the bucket empties, the water tapers off and can't over fill the boiler. The water tower, as you can see, will overfill the train each time an operator 'falls asleep at the switch'. And, of course, there is that slowing down of the whole process as the tower water tank empties, but since the bucket gets filled between trains, and that is a long time compared to how long it takes to fill the bucket, it doesn't slow down the process. LSMFT, let's stop my fingers are tired.
 

mogur

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 24, 2009
192
9
Whidbey Island, WA
Oops. Maybe that didn't make sense, either. Give me another shot at it.

A super cap doesn't depend on a chemical reaction to store or deliver energy, like a battery does. So, it can transfer fixed amounts of energy almost instantly compared to a battery. The lifetime of a battery is degraded by the changes in its chemistry as it is charged and depleted. The super cap has almost infinite lifetime, by comparison (>500,000 cycles). Total energy capacity of a super cap with reasonable dimensions is (I think, and the reason for this thread) about one puff. If true, that opens up the possibility that the super cap can be used by itself for one puff. When the super cap cig is put back in its case (whether portable, or plugged in), it will only take a few seconds to recharge.

The rest of my gibberish is just an attempt to justify the advantages to be gained by this senario. I'm brushing over the difficulties involved on purpose, because that can only be determined if the science is there in the first place.
 

mogur

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 24, 2009
192
9
Whidbey Island, WA
The voltage from the cap will drop with use just like it does from a battery. Google capacitor discharge calculator.

I think it is a neat idea and worth looking into. Let us know what you find out.

Okay, this is ridiculous. This is my third attempt at posting in the last twenty minutes. Each time the board is busy and trashes my post, forcing me to re-compose it. I will save to a text file this time, so I won't have to dream up new bullcrap each time.

A super cap's voltage falls off linearly, much faster than a battery. That requires a boost converter to even have a chance of working. The converter is what provides a constant voltage, assuming it has voltage regulation built in. The tapering at the end of each puff cycle is due to the input from the super cap falling below the minimum input voltage of the converter. Well, company, here, have to go.
 

styler

Full Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 2, 2009
21
1
First time poster here, but this was so interesting I had to dive in.

I think Mogur might actually be on to something. I've been looking at super caps for some time trying to figure out if they would work. As a point of reference I wanted to compare super caps to batteries and I found the following formula.

(Vmin + Vmax)/2 * F / 3600 = Ah

If we use two 10F caps instead of one we can get 5V output, this will cut the farads in half so I used 5 Farads in the formula. Vmin in this example is probably 3.6V and Vmax is 5V. btw - This approach might eliminate the need for a regulator circuit.

so, (3.6+5/2)x5/3600 = .00597Ah which is 5.97mAh

That doesn't sound like much, but as Mogur points out it charges in seconds so the real question is how long we want it to last between charges (i.e. one vape or a full session).

Size might be an issue (especially if two larger caps are used). A 50F 2.5V super cap is 18mmx40mm, and a 100F 2.5V is 18mmx60mm.

Sourcing might also be an issue - I have not not been able to find a source that sells larger super caps in small lots.

Still, there might be several compelling advantages;

- Consistant vapes
- Less wear on attys
- Completely sealed body (could even be water tight)
- Less than half the weight of batteries
- It would hold a charge for a very very long time
- Expected life would be years
 

styler

Full Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 2, 2009
21
1
Anyone tried it?

Still got all your fingers?

:D

I'm not an expert on the risk factor, but the voltage and amp levels are the same as batteries. And there is nothing corrosive, harmful or explosive to worry about.

These are not the coffee can sized monster caps that dump their load in half a sec. Their discharge is very similar to batteries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread