Aromamizer RDTA by Steam Crave

Status
Not open for further replies.

Flavored

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 11, 2013
1,674
5,793
USA
Yes, thanks. Seems unwise to loosen the deck to base connection, as that is the electrical connection and will vary resistance. I get why some would do the sanding, that's fine, but I'm not sure why it is suggested that the tank loosening would require readjustment. As long as care is taken to twist the atty from the knurled base when installing on the mod, no readjustment would be required ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jazzvaper

cigatron

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 14, 2014
3,213
13,374
clinton ar
Yes, thanks. Seems unwise to loosen the deck to base connection, as that is the electrical connection and will vary resistance. I get why some would do the sanding, that's fine, but I'm not sure why it is suggested that the tank loosening would require readjustment. As long as care is taken to twist the atty from the knurled base when installing on the mod, no readjustment would be required ever.

Some of us pocket our rigs and remove them by grasping the tank. If the tank spins alignment is lost.
 

Flavored

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 11, 2013
1,674
5,793
USA
Ok, thanks. Can't say that I've "pants pocketed" this tank, more of a shirt pocket guy. The tank still doesn't twist so easy, but if it were leveraged when pulling it from your pocket, I could see it nudging a little. I'd advocate the sanding (or at least match marking) for that case. Don't think I'd ever loosen the electrical connection (deck to base) to align.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigatron

cigatron

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 14, 2014
3,213
13,374
clinton ar
My first Aromomizer had the airholes perfectly aligned to the vdeck so I never had to sand the tank bottom. My second one was off and needed rotating approx 15° clockwise. The threads of the tank have a thread pitch of .5mm. That means that sanding .5mm of material off the bottom of the tank would cause a FULL 360° rotation. I only needed 15° of rotation so:
360° ÷ 15° = 24
05mm ÷ 24 = .021mm
.021mm = .0008"

That's right, I only had to sand off less than 1/thousanths of an inch to get things to line up proper. That's about 3x less than the thickness if a human hair!

For those of you who would like to try this mod make sure you use 320grit or finer sandpaper on a flat surface, rub the base on the paper and check your progress after each pass or two of light sanding. It's a good idea to wipe the metal filings off the base for each test fit and wash the tank fully when done.

Cig:)
 
Last edited:

Thayamax

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 7, 2013
6,502
19,287
Southeast Michigan
I adjust mine by loosening the tank a little to line up with the air holes. If/when I get some fine grit sandpaper I would do it that way. I tried it the other way by placing the deck in the tank and tightening the base, but my pin ended up turning with the base right at the end, which landed it out of alignment anyway. So my thought is the same as @cigatron.
 

Badhabit8o8

Full Member
Nov 28, 2015
17
25
I also sanded the tank portion a tad myself. I would like to inform u peeps that I've recently ordered two more v decks from sc and they don't screw on exactly like the one that came with my first purchase. Luckily they line up with the other two holes on the vape band. So whichever deck i end up using for the time being, I'd adjust my vape band accordingly
 

Badhabit8o8

Full Member
Nov 28, 2015
17
25
Also @roxynoodle the first and only build I've gone to love on the three post deck is that quad. I've done testing on other coils and always went back to that build. Can't beat the flavor and fat clouds. Glad I came across this thread while waiting for my rdta to ship. Thanks a bunch
 

roxynoodle

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jun 19, 2014
15,344
37,213
Ohio
Also @roxynoodle the first and only build I've gone to love on the three post deck is that quad. I've done testing on other coils and always went back to that build. Can't beat the flavor and fat clouds. Glad I came across this thread while waiting for my rdta to ship. Thanks a bunch

I think its still my favorite build, too. Its the best build for my one that has the airholes crossing the deck at 45° angles. No vape band, and each airhole is hitting a coil. So I do like having both decks as I agree, the 3 post is better for that build.

I tried doing infinity coils with the v deck to get quads and that was a disaster using 28/32 claptons. I test fired just one side and it needed 8v to light up well :confused: So I tossed that idea in the bin.
 

cigatron

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 14, 2014
3,213
13,374
clinton ar
I also sanded the tank portion a tad myself. I would like to inform u peeps that I've recently ordered two more v decks from sc and they don't screw on exactly like the one that came with my first purchase. Luckily they line up with the other two holes on the vape band. So whichever deck i end up using for the time being, I'd adjust my vape band accordingly

Exactly 90° difference between decks? Wow, how lucky is that?
 

jazzvaper

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 14, 2014
1,435
2,795
USA
There are three ways of aligning the airholes to the vdeck being discussed.

1. Rotating the tank by loosening it a little. This is what you are talking about. It's temporary and requires readjustment periodically.

2. Sanding the bottom of the tank. It is easy and is a permanent fix as long as the tank, deck and 510 base remain as a matched set. All parts can be fully tightened and everything lines up every time. No fiddling required.

3. The one we are talking about now. Turning the tank upside down, inserting only the deck into the tank and rotating it for alignment, then screwing the 510 base onto the tank and deck at the same time while watching the 510 screw of the deck to make sure the deck doesn't spin out of position before the 510 base tightens fully to the tank. This scenario has many of us believing that the deck never really gets tightened fully to the 510 base and could be less than optimal for tc applications due to ground path intermittency.

Caught up?

"1" would be nutz for TC IMHO. TC is all I do except for squonking.

"2" is the "Rubicon problem", once you cross it your on your way to Rome and all that ultimately entails. [emoji30]

"3" is one extra small step when filling, or, dry-burning, or, re-wicking that assures proper alignment AFC to vertical coil. Proof that there is no "intermittency" for me is that the resistances [0.12 and 0.13] have not budged. Remember, two (2) sets of screw threads need to align no matter what.
 

dwcraig1

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 17, 2012
9,013
49,449
Imperial Beach, California
Looking at my Wismec's display I see it say's " 0.310Ω but in EScribe atomizer analyzer it says "0.315 Ω. So I take a drag and atomizer analyzer says "0.515Ω. The resistance on the display never changed from 0.310Ω at any time.
I guess it must not have really changed then as the display indicate it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jazzvaper

Vapin Dave

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 9, 2015
751
849
42
California
"1" would be nutz for TC IMHO. TC is all I do except for squonking.

"2" is the "Rubicon problem", once you cross it your on your way to Rome and all that ultimately entails. [emoji30]

"3" is one extra small step when filling, or, dry-burning, or, re-wicking that assures proper alignment AFC to vertical coil. Proof that there is no "intermittency" for me is that the resistances [0.12 and 0.13] have not budged. Remember, two (2) sets of screw threads need to align no matter what.
um rotating the tank does not affect resistance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread