Ban Juul, not vaping

Status
Not open for further replies.

GOMuniEsq

Self-Proclaimed Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 25, 2012
1,159
3,546
Alberta, Canada
Kids are trying to kill themselves. They take the greatest risks, seeking immediate reward with little thought toward consequences. It's amazing that any of us survive to maturity. And it's bizarre that anyone thinks we can legislate the risk out of their lives.

"All this was indispensably necessary," replied the one-eyed doctor, "for private misfortunes are public benefits; so that the more private misfortunes there are, the greater is the general good." —Voltaire
 

bombastinator

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 12, 2010
11,784
24,660
MN USA
Kids are trying to kill themselves. They take the greatest risks, seeking immediate reward with little thought toward consequences. It's amazing that any of us survive to maturity. And it's bizarre that anyone thinks we can legislate the risk out of their lives.

"All this was indispensably necessary," replied the one-eyed doctor, "for private misfortunes are public benefits; so that the more private misfortunes there are, the greater is the general good." —Voltaire
I personally would replace “trying to kill themselves” with something different as it implies a direct intention. “Stupiding themselves to death” might work, though of course there are also kids who commit intentional suicide. It’s not a new problem by any means. Minimizing risk to children has been one of the major long term goals of civilization for as long as it has been around. It’s been largely successful at it too. It will never get to zero though.

I still don’t believe the whole “it’s us or the kids!” Thing is accurate. Most of the bits that are actually being attacked have nothing to do with the actual problem.

If it is though “us” will lose and lose totally. “Women and children first” is still a thing in this society.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Letitia

GOMuniEsq

Self-Proclaimed Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 25, 2012
1,159
3,546
Alberta, Canada
I still don’t believe the whole “it’s us or the kids!” Thing is accurate. Most of the bits that are actually being attacked have nothing to do with the actual problem.
I agree with you in this case. The whole "for the kids" thing is an obvious smokescreen meant to distract us into infighting. The actual problem is that vaping is being unjustly vilified by corrupt lawmakers.
 

jandrew

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2013
2,109
12,347
Winnipeg
That I am angry about as well. Lack of empathy for dying kids is not required for this though. I am angry both that they are using the problem these kids are having to attempt to attack something that did not cause it AND I am angry that they are not attacking the problem that actually did.

I don't think it helps to continually refer to "dying kids" ... according to the CDC as of Oct 1, 16% of patients are under 18 --- and in terms of deaths: "The median age of deceased patients was 49.5 years and ranged from 27-71 years."

I certainly wouldn't want to trivialise the lung illness, or the fact that many youth and young people are sick with whatever this disease/illness is --- but there simply aren't a lot of (or any) "kids dying".
 

Uncle Willie

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
  • May 27, 2011
    2,395
    99,735
    Meet Me in St Louie Louie
    I don't think it helps to continually refer to "dying kids" ... according to the CDC as of Oct 1, 16% of patients are under 18 --- and in terms of deaths: "The median age of deceased patients was 49.5 years and ranged from 27-71 years."

    I certainly wouldn't want to trivialise the lung illness, or the fact that many youth and young people are sick with whatever this disease/illness is --- but there simply aren't a lot of (or any) "kids dying".

    Yep .. you beat me to it ..
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Letitia

    bombastinator

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Sep 12, 2010
    11,784
    24,660
    MN USA
    I agree with you in this case. The whole "for the kids" thing is an obvious smokescreen meant to distract us into infighting. The actual problem is that vaping is being unjustly vilified by corrupt lawmakers.
    By conflating it. IMHO The differentiation between THC systems, CBD systems, and (where we will likely disagree) protonated nic systems, need to be made. I do agree that protonated nic May very well not belong in the company of the other two. I’m currently liking @Baditude ’s posting of that grim green video using the term “open system vape” to differentiate.
     

    bombastinator

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Sep 12, 2010
    11,784
    24,660
    MN USA
    I don't think it helps to continually refer to "dying kids" ... according to the CDC as of Oct 1, 16% of patients are under 18 --- and in terms of deaths: "The median age of deceased patients was 49.5 years and ranged from 27-71 years."

    I certainly wouldn't want to trivialise the lung illness, or the fact that many youth and young people are sick with whatever this disease/illness is --- but there simply aren't a lot of (or any) "kids dying".
    That number is a moving target that has been shifting upward. The initial victims were all children. I haven’t been following those numbers lately.
     

    jandrew

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
    Apr 2, 2013
    2,109
    12,347
    Winnipeg
    That number is a moving target that has been shifting upward. The initial victims were all children. I haven’t been following those numbers lately.
    Well, initial victims were "teens" ... actual ages weren't given (that I recall) so we don't know if they were "children" or 18 and 19 year olds. The number of victims has certainly climbed (over 1000 now), as has the number of deaths (18) --- but the number of "kids" deaths has remained zero.
     

    englishmick

    Vaping Master
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Sep 25, 2014
    5,419
    29,487
    Naptown, Indiana
    I don't think it helps to continually refer to "dying kids" ... according to the CDC as of Oct 1, 16% of patients are under 18 --- and in terms of deaths: "The median age of deceased patients was 49.5 years and ranged from 27-71 years."

    I certainly wouldn't want to trivialise the lung illness, or the fact that many youth and young people are sick with whatever this disease/illness is --- but there simply aren't a lot of (or any) "kids dying".

    I guess whoever does whatever is causing this gets sick, it's the older individuals with less robust lungs who pay the highest price.
     

    bombastinator

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Sep 12, 2010
    11,784
    24,660
    MN USA
    Well, initial victims were "teens" ... actual ages weren't given (that I recall) so we don't know if they were "children" or 18 and 19 year olds. The number of victims has certainly climbed (over 1000 now), as has the number of deaths (18) --- but the number of "kids" deaths has remained zero.
    Zero. That’s a pretty significant digit there. Very very different than what seems to have been claimed or implied. I was under the impression that most or all of the sufferers were basically kids (yes you 19 year olds I consider you kids. I didn’t like it when I was that age and people my current age told me that but now that I am my current age I see their point). I guess there’s this weird period between about 16 and 25 that isn’t exactly kid but isn’t exactly full-on grownup either. In German there’s a form of address: ”Junger” which translates literally as “youth” that might apply better. I’m not German so I’m not sure.
     

    bombastinator

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Sep 12, 2010
    11,784
    24,660
    MN USA
    Now I understand why you identify so much with the stupid people.
    I’m not normally in the habit of defending @gpjoe , and while this might wind up being a damnation by faint praise, I feel moved to jump in.

    IMHO the difference between a stupid person and a not stupid person is so fine as to nearly not matter. Frequently stupidity, ignorance, and quality of information are confused. People who have more information (of whatever quality) in one area tend to have less in another.
    One thing the Red crowd seems to have made clear to the Blue crowd is that the information they get is less perfect than they think it is. That the reverse is more true (that while the Blue information is flawed it is still orders of magnitude less massively flawed than the Red information) doesn’t seem to be permeating the Red groups as well. Still, willful ignorance is not the same as stupidity, and there are similar numbers of willfully ignorant people on both sides.
     

    iVapeDIY

    Senior Member
    ECF Veteran
    Sep 1, 2017
    279
    538
    Toronto, Canada
    Juul accused by U.S. school districts of creating vaping ‘nuisance’ - BNN Bloomberg

    School districts in New York, Kansas and Missouri sued Juul Labs Inc. over the economic burden created by teen vaping, opening a new legal front as the U.S. grapples with a widening public-health crisis.

    Officials of school districts in Long Island, New York; Johnson County, Kansas; and Missouri’s St. Charles County accused Juul of intentionally targeting teens with its product and creating a public nuisance with the health problems tied to vaping. The complaints filed in federal courts Monday make the same arguments local governments are using against opioid makers over a nationwide addiction epidemic.

    See also ...
     

    gpjoe

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Oct 30, 2013
    2,594
    4,842
    Up North
    I’m not normally in the habit of defending @gpjoe , and while this might wind up being a damnation by faint praise, I feel moved to jump in.

    IMHO the difference between a stupid person and a not stupid person is so fine as to nearly not matter. Frequently stupidity, ignorance, and quality of information are confused. People who have more information (of whatever quality) in one area tend to have less in another.
    One thing the Red crowd seems to have made clear to the Blue crowd is that the information they get is less perfect than they think it is. That the reverse is more true (that while the Blue information is flawed it is still orders of magnitude less massively flawed than the Red information) doesn’t seem to be permeating the Red groups as well. Still, willful ignorance is not the same as stupidity, and there are similar numbers of willfully ignorant people on both sides.

    Hey, we may disagree, but I still respect your opinion, as with everyone here and I refrain from personal attacks.
     

    mgordon1100

    Super Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    May 24, 2011
    785
    599
    56
    A, A
    I’m not normally in the habit of defending @gpjoe , and while this might wind up being a damnation by faint praise, I feel moved to jump
    While I agree with all you've said below this statement, I made my statement for a reason. Maybe not a very good reason, but a reason nonetheless. This man has been twisting my words since he began.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread