The costs of running this huge site are paid for by ads. Please consider registering and becoming a Supporting Member for an ad-free experience. Thanks, ECF team.

Bench Test Results: AWT 35A 3500mAh 18650...laughably overrated, only an 8A battery, do not buy

Discussion in 'Batteries and Chargers' started by Mooch, Sep 23, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Image has been removed.
URL has been removed.
Email address has been removed.
Media has been removed.
  1. Mooch

    Mooch Electron Wrangler Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Supporting member
    May 13, 2015
    While the test results are hard data, the conclusions and recommendations I make based on these tests are only my personal opinion based on my criteria for setting a rating. Carefully research any cell you are considering using before purchasing.

    Testing cells at their limits is dangerous and should never, ever, be attempted by anyone who has not thoroughly studied the dangers involved and how to minimize them.

    If the cell has only one current rating number on it, or if it only says "max" then I have to assume that the company is stating that the cell can be discharged at that current level in any way, including continuously.

    Cell photos: https://imgur . com/a/YHIWK
    (Sorry for the split link but direct links to Imgur do not display properly)

    Bottom Line
    This “35A” cell is so overrated I am again at a loss for words. This AWT appears identical, and performs almost identical, to the not-so-great performing Samsung 35E. I rated that Samsung at 8A.

    AWT’s 35A rating is even useless as a “pulse” rating. The first pulse at 35A on a fully charged cell dropped the voltage to under 3.0V.

    The wrap has “IMR 18650” on it but this cell does not use the battery chemistry often associated with the IMR model number prefix. It uses the chemistry associated with the INR prefix.

    I feel strongly that each of us is free to buy whichever batteries we want but I urge you to consider whether or not you want to support a company like this.

    I am rating this AWT at 8A and 3500mAh.

    The two cells that were tested were purchased for that purpose by me.

    Comparison to Samsung 35E Test Results
    AWT Patterned 35A 3500mAh 18650 CC Test.jpg

    Pulse-Current Test Results
    Pulse testing was not done due to it being a 35E rewrap.

    To see how other cells have tested and how hard you can safely push them, check out these links: List of Battery Tests | E-Cigarette Forum
    • Like Like x 6
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Tonee N

    Tonee N Vaping Master Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Mar 24, 2017
    I thought that 8A was a typo, I just couldn't believe it.
    They need to make toxic chemicals, seems more up their alley.
    Thank you Mooch for looking out for us.

    Sent from the future
    • Like Like x 3
  3. sonicbomb

    sonicbomb Vaping Master Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Feb 17, 2015
    1187 Hundertwasser
    I get the feeling that AWT execs torture kittens as a bit of light relief from dangerously exploiting their unwitting customers.
    • Like Like x 2
  4. Jim_ MDP

    Jim_ MDP Ultra Member ECF Veteran

    Sep 24, 2015
    Oh c'mon... 8A? :eek:

    There's ludicrous, then there's Efest, then there's "beyond the pale"... then there's this. :mad:
    • Like Like x 3
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice