Bench Test Results: Samsung 15L 18A 1500mAh 18650...not a great performer

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mooch

Electron Wrangler
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
  • May 13, 2015
    3,946
    15,442
    While the test results are hard data, the conclusions and recommendations I make based on these tests are only my personal opinion based on my criteria for setting a rating. Carefully research any cell you are considering using before purchasing.

    Testing cells at their limits is dangerous and should never, ever, be attempted by anyone who has not thoroughly studied the dangers involved and how to minimize them.

    If the cell has only one current rating number on it, or if it says "max" then I have to assume that the company is stating that the cell can be discharged at that current level in any way, including continuously.

    IMG_5599.JPG IMG_5600.JPG IMG_5601.JPG IMG_5602.JPG


    Bottom Line
    This cell has a 18A continuous rating from Samsung. Considering the other great cells we can choose from with much higher capacity ratings at 20A continuous this Samsung just isn’t very useful for us.

    I am rating this Samsung 15L at 18A and 1500mAh.

    The two cells that were tested were purchased by me from IMRBatteries.


    Continuous-Current Test Results
    IMG_5608.jpg


    Pulse-Current Test Results
    IMG_5609.jpg IMG_5610.jpg


    Always Remember
    ⁃ There is no 18650 with a factory/manufacturer rating over 30A continuous.
    - There is no 3000mAh 18650 that can have a rating over 20A continuous.
    ⁃ There is no 3100mAh-3600mAh 18650 that can have a rating over 10A continuous.
    ⁃ There is no 18650 available to vapers that has a capacity rating over 3600mAh.


    Comments
    • At 10A continuous this cell delivered 1414mAh. This is good performance for a 1500mAh rated cell so I am rating it at 1500mAh.
    To see how other cells have tested and how hard you can safely push them, check out these links: List of Battery Tests | E-Cigarette Forum
     
    Last edited by a moderator:
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread