I have not read the entire thread...
I will say this though...
Dinosaurs and Evolution.
Even though the OP and others are right... Meaning we certainly DO NOT smoke anymore... You should also bear in mind that there is a clinic/ therapeutic tradition when it comes to the 'quitting smoking' agenda which has been "out there" for a very long time and, because of the very "traditional facts" it was entitled to make a connection between smoking traditional cigarettes and the NEGATIVE effects on health; cause the former, consequence the latter...
Nowadays there is a new way which is SAFER and could imply some sort of 'extension' of the 'puffing habit'... This means that the very behaviour is still "active"...
Not a problem, since the big issue was the unhealthy factor in the first place...
But...
The before mentioned tradition could afford to associate the smoking habit/ behavioral aspect to the effects... And they even ended up seeing those two as counter-parts to the very same core of the issue... Leading to a whole implicit philosophy based on that concept... This notion became the basis to their formulations and is right now a DOGMA to the academical approach on quitting and thus clinical.
While this used to be logical it simply makes no sense anymore in terms of newer possibilities based on technological development...
Because, even when we considered that the e-cig user is smoking ("electronically"), as in the habit 'is still there'... Well... Maybe, but even then you couldnt afford to claim this makes for the same DEADLY former habit... Is this a new way to 'recycle' the habit? An extension?
This is a matter of interpretation... But... Even when we agreed on this... The down-sides to smoking which made it necessary for a quitting serious agenda to be available in the first place would not be there anymore...
This is why Doctors and 'quitters-wanna-be' wont accept this... The fact they are biased out of putting a lot of energy, work and study for years; decades of effort...
The very same doctors who SHOULD have tested the e-cig from a start but did not because they DEPEND on the close circuit that 'connects' them to Big Pharma... They would only rely on what Big Pharma gives them...
Do you think that those doctors, with all their PHDs and stuff are going to so simply accept that an ordinary chinese out there, with a simple battery, coil and some vanilla escence has FOUND what they, with all their knowledgeable backgrounds couldnt?
Mmmm...
These very people who have always claimed smokers are in denial because nobody could ever possibly want to smoke are the very ones in denial right now...
They are not very professionally-oriented... And, of course they aren't...
This is not science anymore; it has become more of a 'religion' to them...
Smoking is the devil and the habit is sin... If you try to beat the devil with technology you are still a sinner...!
Is this logical thinking or fundamentalism, rather?
This is a typical case of a biased 'old model' which they will try to re-enforce now even harder... Otherwise it could mean their whole decades research might end up in the bin...
Of course they wont fight us back with logics... They dont stand a chance...
They will try to hit us with lies, confusion and such...
Nevertheless...
We should not go mad... No matter how 'powerful', big and terrible they are... They are dinosaurs, all right... But we shouldnt hate this...
On the contrary, we should lay back and simply enjoy this 'revolutionary' process of change...
Relying on evolution doing its work...
Again...
Drama.
I will say this though...
Dinosaurs and Evolution.
Even though the OP and others are right... Meaning we certainly DO NOT smoke anymore... You should also bear in mind that there is a clinic/ therapeutic tradition when it comes to the 'quitting smoking' agenda which has been "out there" for a very long time and, because of the very "traditional facts" it was entitled to make a connection between smoking traditional cigarettes and the NEGATIVE effects on health; cause the former, consequence the latter...
Nowadays there is a new way which is SAFER and could imply some sort of 'extension' of the 'puffing habit'... This means that the very behaviour is still "active"...
Not a problem, since the big issue was the unhealthy factor in the first place...
But...
The before mentioned tradition could afford to associate the smoking habit/ behavioral aspect to the effects... And they even ended up seeing those two as counter-parts to the very same core of the issue... Leading to a whole implicit philosophy based on that concept... This notion became the basis to their formulations and is right now a DOGMA to the academical approach on quitting and thus clinical.
While this used to be logical it simply makes no sense anymore in terms of newer possibilities based on technological development...
Because, even when we considered that the e-cig user is smoking ("electronically"), as in the habit 'is still there'... Well... Maybe, but even then you couldnt afford to claim this makes for the same DEADLY former habit... Is this a new way to 'recycle' the habit? An extension?
This is a matter of interpretation... But... Even when we agreed on this... The down-sides to smoking which made it necessary for a quitting serious agenda to be available in the first place would not be there anymore...
This is why Doctors and 'quitters-wanna-be' wont accept this... The fact they are biased out of putting a lot of energy, work and study for years; decades of effort...
The very same doctors who SHOULD have tested the e-cig from a start but did not because they DEPEND on the close circuit that 'connects' them to Big Pharma... They would only rely on what Big Pharma gives them...
Do you think that those doctors, with all their PHDs and stuff are going to so simply accept that an ordinary chinese out there, with a simple battery, coil and some vanilla escence has FOUND what they, with all their knowledgeable backgrounds couldnt?
Mmmm...
These very people who have always claimed smokers are in denial because nobody could ever possibly want to smoke are the very ones in denial right now...
They are not very professionally-oriented... And, of course they aren't...
This is not science anymore; it has become more of a 'religion' to them...
Smoking is the devil and the habit is sin... If you try to beat the devil with technology you are still a sinner...!
Is this logical thinking or fundamentalism, rather?
This is a typical case of a biased 'old model' which they will try to re-enforce now even harder... Otherwise it could mean their whole decades research might end up in the bin...
Of course they wont fight us back with logics... They dont stand a chance...
They will try to hit us with lies, confusion and such...
Nevertheless...
We should not go mad... No matter how 'powerful', big and terrible they are... They are dinosaurs, all right... But we shouldnt hate this...
On the contrary, we should lay back and simply enjoy this 'revolutionary' process of change...
Relying on evolution doing its work...
Again...
Drama.
Last edited: