Well, add California to the list of states wanting to categorize electronic cigarettes as "tobacco products." That can only be for tax purposes in a state desperate for additional taxes. But the ramifications are many -- none good, in my view. I'm sorry to say that I am not interested in a practice only legal in the confines of my own home, taxed to the hilt and despised by the general public. That should not be the e-cig future. Here's the bill:
Note that vote: 17-0. Suffolk County was simply a pioneer in a tidal wave coming down on e-cigs.
And this is awaiting referral to a committee:
Other California measures would prohibit smoking at hospitals (and that would now include e-cigarette use if the 17-0 vote is indicative of a law to come) and in state parks and on beaches.
SB 400: Including Electronic Cigarettes in the Definition of a tobacco Product (Corbett D, San Leandro)
Legislative Activity: The Assembly Appropriations Committee passed SB 400 by a vote of 17-0 on August 19.
Next Step: SB 400 has been sent to the Assembly floor where it will receive a vote by the full Assembly.
Note that vote: 17-0. Suffolk County was simply a pioneer in a tidal wave coming down on e-cigs.
And this is awaiting referral to a committee:
SJR 8: Requesting the FDA to Prohibit Sales of Electronic Cigarettes until Proven Safe (Corbett D, San Leandro)
Legislative Activity: No activity this week.
Next Step: SJR 8 has been sent to the Assembly and is waiting to be referred to a committee.
Other California measures would prohibit smoking at hospitals (and that would now include e-cigarette use if the 17-0 vote is indicative of a law to come) and in state parks and on beaches.