considering the precise...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trox.Shawn

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 6, 2009
548
89
40
Des Allemands, Louisiana
Since I have made the jump from 3.7v to 6v the normal 3.7v devices just don't cut it when it comes to vapor production/Throat hit, however, I have been out of the loop. Now I see this new atomizers made to simulate a 5v vape. I have always been fund of the smaller devices for their discreetness, and since the precise is the smallest 3.7v PV on the market I am considering one coupled with these new low resistance atomizers. I do however, still have a few question from those that have been using the precise.

1. How long do the batteries last? Mind you I go through about 2-3ml of juice per day on my 6v HV801 Super 6
2. How is the throat hit on the LR510 compared to the above set up? I started with a 510 because it had a heavier throat hit so I assume these would pack more of a punch, but how much more?
3. Where can I find protected 10440 batteries, as I only have unprotected ones on hand from some unsuccesful homebrew mod runs.
 

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
the 10440 can't take the load. But the new 18650 can and will take you into next Sunday with the LR atty. The 10440 just doesn't have the cajonas. It is rated at 320mAh, and that is overrated in my opinion. The precise is a sweet device, but not with the LR. Now the 16340 precise can handle the LR quite nicely.
 

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
I use the LR 510 on my Precise all the time. Constant vaping I get 1 1/2 hours on a 10440 battery. That's never setting it down. Lasts a good while when I'm out and about and not using it constantly. My batteries seem to be doing fine so far.
... and that is about right. Using a reg atty on the 10440 you would be getting in the neighbourhood of 3-3.5 hrs per batt.

The recommended batts for the LRs are high drain batts of 440 mAh or better, hence why I stated the LR would be better suited on the 16340 or 18650 precise, which will probably give you roughly 5 to 12hrs before recharging.
 

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
Yeah, it varies a bit, I think Grimm said he is getting about an hour out of LR atomizers so expect about 1-1.5 hours. On regular 510's you get approx 1.5-2 hours.
... using a regular atty on the 510.

IMHO there is no way a 180 mAh batt (stock 510) will produce longer that a 320 mAh (10440) using a LR atty. The only delta I can see is that the precise puts out 3.7V (in the beginning) whilst the 510 with it's PCB circuitery only puts out 3.1V although it is a 3.7V device.

I could be wrong though... I have never tried the LR on a 10440 or 510 batt. But I have tried them on 14500s, 16340, and the eGo batts. They pretty much performed the same, basically reducing (normal) battery life by almost half.
 

CHUCKLEHEAD

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 19, 2009
1,830
36
Redneck Rivera
Since I have made the jump from 3.7v to 6v the normal 3.7v devices just don't cut it when it comes to vapor production/Throat hit, however, I have been out of the loop. Now I see this new atomizers made to simulate a 5v vape. I have always been fund of the smaller devices for their discreetness, and since the precise is the smallest 3.7v PV on the market I am considering one coupled with these new low resistance atomizers. I do however, still have a few question from those that have been using the precise.

1. How long do the batteries last? Mind you I go through about 2-3ml of juice per day on my 6v HV801 Super 6
2. How is the throat hit on the LR510 compared to the above set up? I started with a 510 because it had a heavier throat hit so I assume these would pack more of a punch, but how much more?
3. Where can I find protected 10440 batteries, as I only have unprotected ones on hand from some unsuccesful homebrew mod runs.
Do you how long the Precise is and it's diameter?
 

CHUCKLEHEAD

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 19, 2009
1,830
36
Redneck Rivera
83mm in length (without the atty) 11.9/12.2 mm wide (thinnest part, thickest part):)
Ok thanks! they are very nice Mods indeed! But not the smallest:confused: The Precious S is 69mm in length and 12.9 mm in diameter! That would make it the smallest on the market! Don't get me wrong both are excellent mods! And it would be slimer!But ih has .5mm of nickle coating
 
Last edited:

rotten76

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 8, 2009
224
9
Kingman, AZ
Ok thanks! they are very nice Mods indeed! But not the smallest:confused: The Precious S is 69mm in length and 12.9 mm in diameter! That would make it the smallest on the market! Don't get me wrong both are excellent mods! And it would be slimer!But ih has .5mm of nickle coating
;)In Davids defence the Precise was the smallest 10440 PV when it came out. But new things come out everyday.:p Maybe now we should say that the Precise is the smallest 10440 PV with a mechanical button.:rolleyes:
 

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
Well, ok, so how does it stack up to a HV801 on the S6?

I am assuming you are talking about the attys from Nhaler. There are two labelled the same. One is HV @ 4.5 Ohms and the other is a 5.2 Ohms. I wish folks would get there labelling straight, it only confuses the mass. The 4.5 is an HV whilst the 5.2 is an XHV atty.

Some useful data to explain what is going on:

  • the LR 1.5 Ohms @ 3.7V = 9.1 watts;
  • stock 2.25 Ohms @ 3.7V = 6 watts
  • stock 2.25 Ohms @ 5V = 11 watts;
  • stock 2.25 Ohms @ 6V = 16 watts;
  • SLBs 3.25 Ohms @ 3.7V = 4.2 watts;
  • SLBs 3.25 Ohms @ 5V = 7.7 watts;
  • SLBs 3.25 Ohms @ 6V = 11.1 watts;
  • SLBs 3.25 Ohms @ 7V = 15.1 watts;
  • HV 4.5 Ohms @ 6V = 8 watts;
  • HV 4.5 Ohms @ 7V = 10.8 watts;
  • HV 4.5 Ohms @ 7.4V = 12.1 watts;
  • HV 4.5 Ohms @ 8.4V = 15.7 watts;
  • XHV 5.2 Ohms @ 7V = 9.8 watts;
  • XHV 5.2 Ohms @ 7.4V = 10.9 watts; and
  • XHV 5.2 Ohms @ 8.4V = 15.7 watts
You can use a LR atty with a 10440 batt, just don't expect great battery life.
 

Trox.Shawn

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 6, 2009
548
89
40
Des Allemands, Louisiana
I am assuming you are talking about the attys from Nhaler. There are two labelled the same. One is HV @ 4.5 Ohms and the other is a 5.2 Ohms. I wish folks would get there labelling straight, it only confuses the mass. The 4.5 is an HV whilst the 5.2 is an XHV atty.

Some useful data to explain what is going on:

  • the LR 1.5 Ohms @ 3.7V = 9.1 watts;
  • stock 2.25 Ohms @ 3.7V = 6 watts
  • stock 2.25 Ohms @ 5V = 11 watts;
  • stock 2.25 Ohms @ 6V = 16 watts;
  • SLBs 3.25 Ohms @ 3.7V = 4.2 watts;
  • SLBs 3.25 Ohms @ 5V = 7.7 watts;
  • SLBs 3.25 Ohms @ 6V = 11.1 watts;
  • SLBs 3.25 Ohms @ 7V = 15.1 watts;
  • HV 4.5 Ohms @ 6V = 8 watts;
  • HV 4.5 Ohms @ 7V = 10.8 watts;
  • HV 4.5 Ohms @ 7.4V = 12.1 watts;
  • HV 4.5 Ohms @ 8.4V = 15.7 watts;
  • XHV 5.2 Ohms @ 7V = 9.8 watts;
  • XHV 5.2 Ohms @ 7.4V = 10.9 watts; and
  • XHV 5.2 Ohms @ 8.4V = 15.7 watts
You can use a LR atty with a 10440 batt, just don't expect great battery life.

Thank you for the data. That really puts things into a better perspective. I do not mind having low battery life really, because it does not bother me to carry a case for batteries around.

I think I may have to make the plunge...
 

Switched

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2010
10,144
2,544
Dartmouth, NS Canada
Thank you for the data. That really puts things into a better perspective. I do not mind having low battery life really, because it does not bother me to carry a case for batteries around.

I think I may have to make the plunge...
Your welcome, as long as you understand that the 10440 is an AAA battery. That's all I was trying to point out, nothing more.
 

forcedfuel50

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Thank you for the data. That really puts things into a better perspective. I do not mind having low battery life really, because it does not bother me to carry a case for batteries around.

I think I may have to make the plunge...

You'll really appreciate the new Precise Switch design, more reliable and less cleaning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread