I am going to use the new immigration law as an example, but there are probably more.
Do you think it is correct for the Officer to make the decision not to enforce a law due to the fact that he disagrees with it?
And if yes, then where do we stop. Should we allow the Officers to decide not to arrest if the suspect deserved to die (reference to murder)? Should we allow Officers to say You should have locked your door to your house/car, and then you wouldnt have been burglarized? That makes it your fault not the suspects
I know the courts are there to make the decisions, but I have never known of an illegal immigration court to make a decision on whether or not the person could or should be deported.
Do you think it is correct for the Officer to make the decision not to enforce a law due to the fact that he disagrees with it?
And if yes, then where do we stop. Should we allow the Officers to decide not to arrest if the suspect deserved to die (reference to murder)? Should we allow Officers to say You should have locked your door to your house/car, and then you wouldnt have been burglarized? That makes it your fault not the suspects
I know the courts are there to make the decisions, but I have never known of an illegal immigration court to make a decision on whether or not the person could or should be deported.