Scientific American has today published a major piece on the FDA's behavior in the run up to the release of its first draft of the deeming regulations.
In a clear violation of its own ethics policy, FDA briefed a select group of reporters on the content of the regulations, but forbad them from seeking third parties for comment, using a so-called "close-hold embargo".
The net result? The only voice represented was those in favor of the regulations, and an American public deprived of hearing from those affected.
The article is a must read, with massive implications beyond this issue. I'll say no more, judge for yourself: How the FDA Manipulates the Media
See also Michael Siegel: The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: FDA Violated Ethics Rules to Censor Dissenting Opinions about Its E-Cigarette Regulations
H/T @DrMA
In a clear violation of its own ethics policy, FDA briefed a select group of reporters on the content of the regulations, but forbad them from seeking third parties for comment, using a so-called "close-hold embargo".
The net result? The only voice represented was those in favor of the regulations, and an American public deprived of hearing from those affected.
The article is a must read, with massive implications beyond this issue. I'll say no more, judge for yourself: How the FDA Manipulates the Media
See also Michael Siegel: The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: FDA Violated Ethics Rules to Censor Dissenting Opinions about Its E-Cigarette Regulations
H/T @DrMA
Last edited: