Designing the perfect drip trank + atomizer?

[polsmoka]

Alright I thought I'd start this thread (of course without searching first to see if there is a similar one on the go.)

As a heavy vaper myself my dream is to have the drip > atomizer experience but without the hassle of manually dripping. Of course. And of course this is what products like MAP tanks and ego-t have in mind.

Here are the criteria:

a) NO fiber or burnable material anywhere near heat source (atomizer,) including the wick.

b) NO cup/resevoir at the atomizer where liquid can pool, be heated cool and be reheated.

c) Minimum tank capacity of 1ml.

d) Cleanable and with a minimum atomizer lifespan of 100ml @ a max cost of $15.

e) Possible to use an existing product and redesign (ie. 401 or 306 atomizer )

f) Tank should be constructed from a non leaching matertial!


I am not a manufacturer or vendor of any e-cig product


So first of all we have an existing good (IMHO) opinion design of tanks in the ego-t. The way it is designed is to not have liquid suck back to the mouthpiece yet draws fluid through the intended drain. Seems adequate.

How could the wick be eliminated and replaced with a direct drop? Piezzo technology maybe?

 

[polsmoka]

Another idea for dropping, electromagnetic aperature?

 

[polsmoka]

meh I did some thread reading and maybe this thread should be killed as way too n00bie. Lot's of geniuses here I see!

Some great stuff happening in those threads, the only thing I would like to see is attention to a) and f) not just to Vapor, TH and flavor.

 

[asdaq]

Specifically related to a) and f) and even in an ego T, as you currently prefer, http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/modders-forum/166374-ego-t-atomizer-disassembly.html. Beyond this there is even bigger and better in the same direction. For some light reading: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/modders-forum/132663-all-my-mods-part1.html

And, welcome aboard polsmoka.

b-e are also somewhat covered too, relatively

 

[polsmoka]

Awesome asdaq thanks!

A LOT of reading. Perhaps we could use this thread to have a simply updated status on each applicable mod that is edited to update rather than more posts?

Maybe include:

1) Mod Name
2) Brief description
3) Design instructions available Y/N
4) Free for personal use Y/N
5) Pending Patent and production Y/N
6) Status (ie. works perfectly, theory only, works but has problems xyz)
7) Link to thread
8) Link to other

I see for you at least 3 mods to classify?

Thanks!

 

[jivefly]

It definitely would be nice to see some more organization in the threads regarding mods. They do make for interesting reading, but to have the concepts and designs compiled into the original post would be superb. Perhaps though, they don't want to make it that easy on us.

 

[asdaq]

Actually, if it is a work in progress, then things tend to get quite long as ideas are shared, improvements are made, and the such.

If someone is presenting a mod they did themselves, the OP typically has the info or additional critical details appear within the first 30 posts or so, usually less.

 

[jonboyusmc]

Already drawn up in AutoCAD, I will be making chips on it tomorrow.