Both surprised this type of comment hasn't gotten more attention and happy it didn't get any likes (at least until time I responded).
It really is a cornerstone for this argument that diketones will one day, inevitably, harm vapers. Cause otherwise, you'd have to reconcile the idea that smokers seemingly (and magically) slipped under the radar with diketones as notable cause for cigarette smoking harms, but was somehow easy to pinpoint as primary problem in vaping.
Thus, you get the notion that it is because vaping is different than smoking as to why it will noticeably affect vapers but didn't noticeably affect smokers.
Yet, then one MUST also consider the notion that we have no long term data on inhaling nicotine. None at all. Sure we have people that have inhaled nicotine for last hundred years or so (more like 3000+ years), but that cannot count under this notion that smoking and vaping are entirely different activities and impact the body in vastly different ways.
And so, it would make as much sense for some vapers (the fear mongerers) to suggest we get rid of this ingredient before it kills us, or at least recognize that it might be a reason that people (the regulators) go after vaping.
I wonder sometimes why the anti-diketone crowd is so inconsistent in their rhetoric.
I really don't think you understood what I wrote, but that seems to be a common issue with some who only seek to attack others...