wasup man, youre real close to me, im at south torrance.which vape meets u go to? the socal ones? was thinkin of goin to one but they seem far. you know where and when the next one is at?
Excellent points. I get more positive comments and questions (leading to new vapers) using my Darwin in public. No one confuse me as a "smoker", which is what we all should strive for. I am in and out of courthouses each week, going through metal detectors manned by shreiffs. Amazingly, many already knew that it was a PV. Some never ask a question. Some have asked and wanted to know where they can get one for themselves or a friend/family member who smokes. No law enforecment officer has EVER thought it was a drug device.
Long story short...Also, as it is primarily a nicotine delivery system, isn't a PV a "drug device"?
I have never understood why alcohol and nicotine get to act like they aren't "drugs".
Yeah, I get that. What I find strange is that actual people buy into it.Long story short...
If they were treated as drugs the FDA would have to ban them.
They get special treatment because it would not be "prudent" to ban them.
So the FDA is not allowed to treat them as drugs.
That's my point. "Drug devices" label a person possessing them as either being deserving of derision, or pity. *Unless* they are "drug devices" which are for legal purposes.It is a drug device. But that term has some stigma to it for its similarity either to illicit devices (bongs and such, in which case you're a stoner and deserving of derision*) or medical devices (in which case something is wrong with you and so you are subjected to pity*).
PVs are drug devices in the same way that cigarette tubes and shot glasses are drug devices. You're technically right, but because the drugs they are used to deliver are neither medical in nature nor subject to the same kind of scorn as illicit substances (unless you run across some puritans) it isn't really fair to lump them in the same category as devices that are.
* From a general public point of view.
That's my point. "Drug devices" label a person possessing them as either being deserving of derision, or pity. *Unless* they are "drug devices" which are for legal purposes.
They are the same, and it's just being dishonest to separate them out into their own little categories. I would say it's unfair to exploit the fact that people can be convinced to go along with this kind of double-talk and agree with the criminalization of some peaceful vices while maintaining their own legal peaceful vice.
Just because people will buy into this kind of thing doesn't make it fair, really it doesn't, so declaring it unfair to lump PV's in with other drug devices doesn't really agree with me at all.
I think you described very well the reaction of the general public to "drug devices".
That's why I would rather people just admit, flat out, that they are choosing to ingest a drug called nicotine (for example) and that to facilitate that activity, they have a drug device called a PV (or cigar, or corncob pipe, or whatever).
Tobacco use, and, to the extent that it's understood, the use of e-cigs, is not subject to the type of scorn reserved for use of 'illicit drugs'.
Yet.
There is some hope that though burning tobacco may one day become illegal, PV's will be legal and accepted.
Sorry, but nicotine is a dangerous and toxic drug, and sooner or later recreational use of it will be criminalized unless we stop this dishonesty and think about freedom in the bigger picture.
If we don't stop scorning and/or pitying those whose peaceful vices are not allowed by the government, then one day all our peaceful vices are belong to them.
I'm rambling a bit in trying to get my opinion stated, I know.
I know now that in the future, if someone sees my PV out in public and asks if it's some kind of drug device, I'll say 'yes'.
It may end up requiring me to explain a bit more that way, but the kind of person who would think that way could use a reminder that nicotine is, in fact, a drug that people choose to use.
A couple of topics here today have got me really thinking about these ideas and situations. I appreciate the discussion and hearing other people's experiences and points-of-view.
eta: I'm going out in public with my box mod now, so I'll catch up to any posts in this thread later. Viva la Vape Freedom!![]()
Maybe not to the same degree, but there is plenty of scorn for people using tobacco.Tobacco use, and, to the extent that it's understood, the use of e-cigs, is not subject to the type of scorn reserved for use of 'illicit drugs'.
I'm not clear on how being honest about nicotine being a drug will keep it from being criminalized.Sorry, but nicotine is a dangerous and toxic drug, and sooner or later recreational use of it will be criminalized unless we stop this dishonesty and think about freedom in the bigger picture.
Might be a post about this (I did not dig to deep) but I was wondering when you go out in public do you take your mods or larger pv's or do you stick to a smaller more analog looking device.
Me I use a Ego-t 1000 mah tank B in public