Do you take your larger PV out in public

Status
Not open for further replies.

Diagasa

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 29, 2010
290
141
USA
I usually take two PV's with me: My ego kit and my Boge Rev2.1. I usually go by the atmosphere to choose my pv. Like at the bar where I get lunch I'll generally use the ego. Its small and I have big hands so it looks like I'm smoking. But if I pull into the parking lot and see only one or two cars my Rev goes with me. I'm still waiting on my Indulgence kit to get here(tomorrow hopefully) but my Silver Bullet used to go with me everywhere. Usually with one of my large homemade tanks on it. I just learned to put an LED in the tank a while back so not only was it huge, it lit up as well.... I'll post a picture. You'll understand lol.

100_0501.jpg
 

jonny2hottie

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 9, 2010
1,364
524
Strong Beach, CALI
www.youtube.com
yea 310 FTW! haha. i actually coordinated the 2nd socal vapers meet. it was in DTLB @ bostons sometime around 7 months ago or so. since then i havent really been too active at the meets but have been meeting up with some modders and reviewing/collaborating mods and ideas to build simple box mods. one of my buddies is in the process of producing a sick mod. his name is rippspeed. i usually meet up with vapingmonkey and rippspeed. we usually just text eachother whenever the next time were free and then meet up. check out vapingmonkey on youtube too. he's does alot of cool stuff and has blossomed quite quickly in the ecig world from when we first started meeting and he was a newb. haha. anyway PM me i think were planning a meet sometime soon. havent heard of any new meets for socal vapers group yet. so i think everyone is waiting for vapefest las vegas! definitely gonna hit that up!
wasup man, youre real close to me, im at south torrance.which vape meets u go to? the socal ones? was thinkin of goin to one but they seem far. you know where and when the next one is at?
 

An Ita

Full Member
Jun 17, 2011
23
49
Grand Old Terra
Excellent points. I get more positive comments and questions (leading to new vapers) using my Darwin in public. No one confuse me as a "smoker", which is what we all should strive for. I am in and out of courthouses each week, going through metal detectors manned by shreiffs. Amazingly, many already knew that it was a PV. Some never ask a question. Some have asked and wanted to know where they can get one for themselves or a friend/family member who smokes. No law enforecment officer has EVER thought it was a drug device.

I have to admit that I still am a nicotine addict who prefers to inhale it in a sort of smoke-like fashion. Vaping is more smoke-like than a patch or gum or the like, so it suits me.
I like lots of things about vaping, but if I didn't actually enjoy smoking I would have had little reason to try vaping.
It wouldn't really offend me if someone thought of me as a smoker, I guess is what I'm getting to.

Also, as it is primarily a nicotine delivery system, isn't a PV a "drug device"?
I have never understood why alcohol and nicotine get to act like they aren't "drugs".

As far as taking my PV out in public, I take my 5v box with me everywhere. Obviously people who are unfamiliar with vaping will have little idea what exactly I'm doing, but I don't have the time or energy to worry about that. So far it's been no problems, and I can't wait for my MonkeyBoxx vv so I can take it with me sometimes!
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Also, as it is primarily a nicotine delivery system, isn't a PV a "drug device"?
I have never understood why alcohol and nicotine get to act like they aren't "drugs".
Long story short...
If they were treated as drugs the FDA would have to ban them.

They get special treatment because it would not be "prudent" to ban them.
So the FDA is not allowed to treat them as drugs.
 

An Ita

Full Member
Jun 17, 2011
23
49
Grand Old Terra
Long story short...
If they were treated as drugs the FDA would have to ban them.

They get special treatment because it would not be "prudent" to ban them.
So the FDA is not allowed to treat them as drugs.
Yeah, I get that. What I find strange is that actual people buy into it.
Like, people believe that a PV is actually not a "drug device", presumably because ''drugs are bad mm'kay'', while nicotine and tobacco are legal, so they must not really be drugs or the government would protect ourselves from ourselves and fund armed forces to hunt down and arrest anyone who tried to get away with making their own decision regarding whether or not to use the aforementioned substance. :facepalm:


tl?;dr? I understand the FDA and similar departments treating things one way or another as a matter of policy, it's just weird to me that regular people also treat nicotine and alcohol as something different than "drugs". :confused:
It's weird that regular people treat a PV as something different from a "drug device". :vapor:
My PV's are drug devices, (no quotation marks necessary).
If someone tried to tell me otherwise, my first response might be like "that word...I do not think that it means what you think that it means". :banana:
 

Mindfield

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 28, 2010
5,029
2,631
53
Toronto, ON
It is a drug device. But that term has some stigma to it for its similarity either to illicit devices (bongs and such, in which case you're a stoner and deserving of derision*) or medical devices (in which case something is wrong with you and so you are subjected to pity*).

PVs are drug devices in the same way that cigarette tubes and shot glasses are drug devices. You're technically right, but because the drugs they are used to deliver are neither medical in nature nor subject to the same kind of scorn as illicit substances (unless you run across some puritans) it isn't really fair to lump them in the same category as devices that are.

* From a general public point of view.
 

Taniger1

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 2, 2011
680
481
Pasco, Washington
Well, I work in a prison (nurse don't ya know). When I first started vapeing in March of this year, I took an eGo with me. The Custody Officers where a bit .....mistrustful of this "new fangled" device. NOW I take a bottom feeder to work with me, and I've actually gotten C/O's to start vapeing :0). I hear about it through the grape vine LOL

I had my Old Goat with me last night, we have a new Lt. He saw me vapeing outside and apparently couldnt' decide if he should walk over and ask me about it (about 2 hours earlier he had watched me literally save someones life, so he was still a bit stunned, non pupillary reaction to start with for you Medical folks), I sashe'd on up to him, turned it off and handed it to him. Told him to smell it LOL I vape chocolate bannana from Rockstar and it sure SMELLS like it.

I gave him the complete run down on it, and he jokingly accused me of getting the officers off of analogs and onto PV's. Guess my start has gone farther than I thought. He told me 4 of the Sgt's had started using them and the regular custody officers where starting to look into it on the day shifts.

My take, I'll vape whatever I am in the mood for, and I'll face down anyone outside in public I need to, I'll do it politly and even gently, but nobody is going to stop me just 'cause of THEIR personal perceptions. And maybe, because I was polite and even gentle, I've started a revolution where I work :0). One can hope anyway!
 

nastos.

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 26, 2011
226
38
42
South West FL,
I take my ego-t with me everywhere. Last night I went to a baseball game and still felt confined to the smoking area didn't want to draw attention since the ego puts out clouds of smoke like vapor. I got alot of questions by smokers and as i answered them I realized all of them had a deathy sort of quality to them made me sure I will never smoke an analogue again.

But yeah I take the ego with me, anything larger I might be a tad iffy about just because cops love to mess with people.
 

An Ita

Full Member
Jun 17, 2011
23
49
Grand Old Terra
It is a drug device. But that term has some stigma to it for its similarity either to illicit devices (bongs and such, in which case you're a stoner and deserving of derision*) or medical devices (in which case something is wrong with you and so you are subjected to pity*).

PVs are drug devices in the same way that cigarette tubes and shot glasses are drug devices. You're technically right, but because the drugs they are used to deliver are neither medical in nature nor subject to the same kind of scorn as illicit substances (unless you run across some puritans) it isn't really fair to lump them in the same category as devices that are.

* From a general public point of view.
That's my point. "Drug devices" label a person possessing them as either being deserving of derision, or pity. *Unless* they are "drug devices" which are for legal purposes.
They are the same, and it's just being dishonest to separate them out into their own little categories. I would say it's unfair to exploit the fact that people can be convinced to go along with this kind of double-talk and agree with the criminalization of some peaceful vices while maintaining their own legal peaceful vice.
Just because people will buy into this kind of thing doesn't make it fair, really it doesn't, so declaring it unfair to lump PV's in with other drug devices doesn't really agree with me at all.

I think you described very well the reaction of the general public to "drug devices".
That's why I would rather people just admit, flat out, that they are choosing to ingest a drug called nicotine (for example) and that to facilitate that activity, they have a drug device called a PV (or cigar, or corncob pipe, or whatever).

Tobacco use, and, to the extent that it's understood, the use of e-cigs, is not subject to the type of scorn reserved for use of 'illicit drugs'.
Yet.
There is some hope that though burning tobacco may one day become illegal, PV's will be legal and accepted.
Sorry, but nicotine is a dangerous and toxic drug, and sooner or later recreational use of it will be criminalized unless we stop this dishonesty and think about freedom in the bigger picture.
If we don't stop scorning and/or pitying those whose peaceful vices are not allowed by the government, then one day all our peaceful vices are belong to them.


I'm rambling a bit in trying to get my opinion stated, I know.
I know now that in the future, if someone sees my PV out in public and asks if it's some kind of drug device, I'll say 'yes'.
It may end up requiring me to explain a bit more that way, but the kind of person who would think that way could use a reminder that nicotine is, in fact, a drug that people choose to use.

A couple of topics here today have got me really thinking about these ideas and situations. I appreciate the discussion and hearing other people's experiences and points-of-view.

eta: I'm going out in public with my box mod now, so I'll catch up to any posts in this thread later. Viva la Vape Freedom! :vapor:
 
Last edited:

Mindfield

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 28, 2010
5,029
2,631
53
Toronto, ON
That's my point. "Drug devices" label a person possessing them as either being deserving of derision, or pity. *Unless* they are "drug devices" which are for legal purposes.
They are the same, and it's just being dishonest to separate them out into their own little categories. I would say it's unfair to exploit the fact that people can be convinced to go along with this kind of double-talk and agree with the criminalization of some peaceful vices while maintaining their own legal peaceful vice.
Just because people will buy into this kind of thing doesn't make it fair, really it doesn't, so declaring it unfair to lump PV's in with other drug devices doesn't really agree with me at all.

I think you described very well the reaction of the general public to "drug devices".
That's why I would rather people just admit, flat out, that they are choosing to ingest a drug called nicotine (for example) and that to facilitate that activity, they have a drug device called a PV (or cigar, or corncob pipe, or whatever).

Tobacco use, and, to the extent that it's understood, the use of e-cigs, is not subject to the type of scorn reserved for use of 'illicit drugs'.
Yet.
There is some hope that though burning tobacco may one day become illegal, PV's will be legal and accepted.
Sorry, but nicotine is a dangerous and toxic drug, and sooner or later recreational use of it will be criminalized unless we stop this dishonesty and think about freedom in the bigger picture.
If we don't stop scorning and/or pitying those whose peaceful vices are not allowed by the government, then one day all our peaceful vices are belong to them.


I'm rambling a bit in trying to get my opinion stated, I know.
I know now that in the future, if someone sees my PV out in public and asks if it's some kind of drug device, I'll say 'yes'.
It may end up requiring me to explain a bit more that way, but the kind of person who would think that way could use a reminder that nicotine is, in fact, a drug that people choose to use.

A couple of topics here today have got me really thinking about these ideas and situations. I appreciate the discussion and hearing other people's experiences and points-of-view.

eta: I'm going out in public with my box mod now, so I'll catch up to any posts in this thread later. Viva la Vape Freedom! :vapor:

But here's the problem: This isn't about honesty. This is about the court of public opinion. This is about politics. And if politics has taught us anything, it is that the court of public opinion can be divided on any issue simply by the choice of words that are used to present the issue. The words don't even have to be dishonest, they just have to be linked to something good or bad in the public's eyes to impart the aegis of being good or bad merely by association. Many people tend to polarize issues; things are either good or bad, with shades of grey conveniently swept under the rug for either being too fussy to deal with (if you're one of the plebes) or inconvenient to your platform (if you're a politician). On a scale of "good for you" to "drugs are bad, mmkay?", where do you think the general public places nicotine? Bearing in mind that it is inextricably linked tobacco, and to many people they are the same thing.

Yes, nicotine is dangerous, addictive and something we shouldn't be doing. But we are, because we are addicts, and there's no getting around that. But focusing on the idea that PVs are drug delivery devices to feed us addicts our drug of choice diminishes if not eclipses the more important public perception that it is a device that got us to quit smoking tobacco. Never mind that we're still addicted to and feeding ourselves nicotine. In the wider scope of things this is not what we should be drawing people's attention to because it immediately associates PVs with nicotine, and therefore tobacco, and therefore it's just as bad in people's oversimplifying eyes. The focus should be on the fact that we quit smoking, and these devices are why.

It isn't being dishonest. It is simply choosing how best to frame these devices for acceptance in the court of public opinion. Because always remember: There are those who are doing the same thing from the other direction.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Tobacco use, and, to the extent that it's understood, the use of e-cigs, is not subject to the type of scorn reserved for use of 'illicit drugs'.
Maybe not to the same degree, but there is plenty of scorn for people using tobacco.
And the level of scorn grows by the day.

Sorry, but nicotine is a dangerous and toxic drug, and sooner or later recreational use of it will be criminalized unless we stop this dishonesty and think about freedom in the bigger picture.
I'm not clear on how being honest about nicotine being a drug will keep it from being criminalized.
Can you expand on that a little bit?
 

wdave

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 11, 2009
1,491
115
Cincinnati, OH
Might be a post about this (I did not dig to deep) but I was wondering when you go out in public do you take your mods or larger pv's or do you stick to a smaller more analog looking device.

Me I use a Ego-t 1000 mah tank B in public

I used to take my Ego-T out in public. It used to make me feel sexy. But I like to be the kinder, gentler me so I take my long white 510 with the purple LED out in public. People like me better :)
 

JacobDaniel

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 13, 2011
173
98
44
Jackson, Michigan
jacobselectronics.net
went to the social security administration and the guard [older guy] had met me at the door and ask me "what is that? is that a pipe?"
I said no its an electronic cigarette [prodigy 3.1], he said ohh come on in and said he had quit cold turkey 10 years ago.
then ask me how it worked and liquid options [flavors], he acted really interested in it.
kinda funny I think
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread