Does this remind you of any other health campaign?

Status
Not open for further replies.

AgentAnia

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2013
3,739
9,455
Orbiting Sirius B
Incredible. Big Sugar. The Blame Game. Blame somebody else, anybody else. It worked on Big tobacco, so what's the next industry we can blame for all our woes?

Never mind inconvenient, pesky ideas like personal or parental responsibility. That takes too much effort. Let the state do it.

:facepalm:

If we need to go after Big [somebody], it's Big Health. Or where will it end?
 

Shipmonster

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2014
191
572
Paradise
I like how in the video the talking head states "they're not here to make America healthy, they're here to make money." And my reaction (read sarcasm) was something akin to

lkrwtf.gif
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,050
NW Ohio US
And "fructose is poison" :facepalm:

And Nixon is the culprit... lol

Forbes: "top beneficiaries of big sugar’s influence for the current election cycle include Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Tom Harkin, D-Iowa ($35,400)"

SC019/SC019: The History of U.S. Sugar Protection

The first Sugar Act, known as the Jones-Costigan Act, became law on May 9, 1934.[erm... that's FDR] Its main six features were as follows:
1.the determination each year of the quantity of sugar needed to supply the nation's requirements at prices reasonable to consumers and fair to producers;

2.the division of the U.S. sugar market among the domestic and foreign supplying areas by the use of quotas and subordinate limitations on offshore direct consumption sugar;

3.the allotment of these quotas among the various processors in each domestic area;

4.the adjustment of production in each domestic area to the established quota;

5.the levying of a tax on the processing of sugarcane and sugar beets, the proceeds of which were to be used to make payments to producers to compensate them for adjusting their production to marketing quotas to increase their income;

6.the equitable division of sugar returns among beet and cane processors, growers, and farm workers.


The U.S. Congress repealed the processing tax (declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in early 1936) and payment provisions. The President [FDR] recommended new legislation that resulted in the enactment of the Sugar Act of 1937. The new Act contained an excise tax that was unrelated to government payments to growers, which would be made out of the U.S. Treasury from funds appropriated for that purpose. Quota allocations resulting from any market expansion were to be shared proportionally by both domestic and foreign areas. This Sugar Act was originally scheduled to expire in 1940 but was extended to 1941, then from 1941 to 1944, from 1944 to 1946, and again from 1946 through December 31, 1947.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread