Doing research paper...need some ideas

Status
Not open for further replies.

cocacola31173

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 7, 2012
2,993
3,992
United States
Im having to do a research paper and the topic I want is "Why E Cigs should not be outlawed" I have to come up with 3 arguments for this. I have my first with it being healthier then smoking real cigarettes but kinda drawing a blank for the other 2.

I have never vaped where smoking is not allowed so Im not going to make the argument that you can vape everywhere.

Any ideas or suggestions for me>

Thanks!
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
Im having to do a research paper and the topic I want is "Why E Cigs should not be outlawed" I have to come up with 3 arguments for this. I have my first with it being healthier then smoking real cigarettes but kinda drawing a blank for the other 2.

I have never vaped where smoking is not allowed so Im not going to make the argument that you can vape everywhere.

Any ideas or suggestions for me>

Thanks!

I think a better topic would be "How to regulate e cigs"
 

Ohms Lawbreaker

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 18, 2014
613
1,865
Right Behind You
1. Please don't bother me if I'm not in your face.
2. Please mind your own business and I'll mind mine.
3. I always figure out a way to do what I want to do anyway without hurting anyone.

Apologies for the snark. But those 3 same things honestly do come to mind. Good luck with the project, curious to see how it turns out.
 

spaceballsrules

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 6, 2011
2,858
3,261
North Carolina, USA
Concentrate on nicotine itself.
Nicotine strength is variable, and even optional. You can add to this that a person does not need to smoke a whole cigarette, but rather, can take 1 puff/toot or 100. It doesn't matter.
Also, nicotine has been shown to actually have positive effects in some cases. FAQ: Nicotine (tobaccoharmreduction.org)

You could talk about the side benefits of not smelling like stale smoke and the decreased staining of teeth.

Cost benefits.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
I've got a whole bunch of arguments for you, but good luck trying to use them...

1) The Nanny State will be the ruin of all that is good and right
2) Social Engineering is evil and wrong
3) Legislating by feeling is much worse than legislating by science
4) Big Pharma wants to own your body, and is not trying to do so for the right reasons
5) Nicotine is not really a bad thing
6) Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose

I'm sure I could come up with some more if you need me to.
:)
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
Nicotine is legal, cigarettes are legal, why wouldn't a cleaner way of using nicotine be legal?

Yes. That's what bothers me about the topic.

"Why E Cigs should not be outlawed"
already carries within it an inference as if cigarettes are already outlawed


aside from the dubiousness of the 'outlaw' wording.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Yes. That's what bothers me about the topic.

"Why E Cigs should not be outlawed"
already carries within it an inference as if cigarettes are already outlawed


aside from the dubiousness of the 'outlaw' wording.
Great point.

A better topic would be...
Why e-cigs should be promoted as a replacement to smoking.
 

ScottP

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 9, 2013
6,392
18,809
Houston, TX
Here is the outline for your paper.

1. Health
A. No Carcinogens, Tar, and other Toxins
B. eLiquid Ingredients are all Generally Regarded As Safe by FDA as food and/or medical devices such as inhalers.
C. Potential for nicotine to be beneficial to reduce risk of Alzheimer's and more.

2. Environment
A. Reduces cigarette litter from butts, packages and lighters
B. The reduced litter prevents birds from making nests with contaminated butts and the toxins from butts from getting into water.
C. No burning = no Co2 release better for "Global Warming"...if you believe in that nonsense.

3. Children and Future Smokers
A. Currently in the US 20% of all people smoke and this trend is likely to continue without an alternative.
B. People that would be destined to become part of that 20% could take up vaping instead which is much better then them taking up smoking.
C. No one will use good tasting vapor flavors as a gateway to nasty tasting cigs so will NOT be a gateway to smoking.

You are welcome...now get us an A. :toast:
 

Ohms Lawbreaker

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 18, 2014
613
1,865
Right Behind You
Do some focus groups, they are a riot, we used to do them all the time in marketing. People love to sit around and chat and tell you what they think, and you get to watch them from behind a two-way mirror in your underwear with a taco and a soda. Really, you would be surprised what goes on behind that glass. We used to have so much fun. Were doing marketing studies on frozen pizzas and wine coolers at the same time, then things started to get out of control.
 

Stosh

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 2, 2010
8,921
16,789
74
Nevada
30 years of advertisement, labeling, restrictions has made little to no progress in stopping people from starting smoking. Personal vaporizers have been the first item to come along that has made a significant impact in reducing smoking. Why would government want to ban the first and only thing that has made a statistical difference in reducing smoking?
 

PLANofMAN

Signature Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 9, 2012
4,147
8,070
45
Woodburn, OR
Our politicians are not doing "the voters will" because the public is outraged over vaping. There is no public "outcry" against vaping. That is an irrational fear that many vapers hold to and justifies their self righteous anger when they see someone else do it...."they'll ruin it for everyone" is the common clarion cry.

No, the overwhelming evidence is that the politicians and policy makers are responding to $$$$. When the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement was done in 1998. Big Tobacco agreed to pay 10 BILLION dollars to states as part of the settlement in perpetuity. This money is SUPPOSED to be used for public health initiatives and to prevent tobacco use in kids.

The idea was keep kids from smoking and let existing smokers die out. States soon realized that if there were no new smokers, then their settlement funds would dry up. After all, the settlement is based on percentage of sales. So a majority of states have done NOTHING to prevent youth smoking with the exception of public service announcements and the creation of organizations of groups like Tobacco Free Kids. Also, the states continue to pass groundless legislation that restricts WHERE you can smoke, but not where you can buy them. This is why you don't see State run Tobacco stores. The idea is keep them readily accessible, so that you can continue to collect your settlement funds.

Now comes e-cigs, which have grown into a 1 Billion dollar industry and our elected officials are now looking at a product that not only negatively impacts CURRENT tobacco sales, but has the potential to negatively impact future tobacco sales. Here is a product that could actually fulfill the goals set out by the MSA. Here is a product that actually could replace smoking, AND effectively shut out 46 states of roughly 10 Billion dollars a year.

And SHOCK...Youth smokers are turning to e-cigs as well. OH OH....10 BILLION Dollars per year to the 46 member states is now in jeopardy... AND don't think Big Tobacco isn't reminding states of this as well. If we don't sell our product, you don't get your money. So now we hear the "Save The Children" cry regarding e-cigs.....

So now the states are pressuring their local communities to ban e-cigs wherever smoking is banned and telling local communities if they don't pass these restrictions, they don't get a share of the Tobacco money because they are "non compliant". Meanwhile, States are attempting to ban internet sales, because a large part of the Billion dollar industry is based on internet sales.

As a result, towns and states are trying to kill the industry that can effectively cost them 10 Billion dollars a year alone in settlement money, not to mention the tobacco tax they receive based on sales, and vapers think that public vaping is the reason.....Wake up!!!

Follow the money.
Let me just repeat one of the most relevant posts on public vaping made in this thread.

It is well worth reading. It tells how vaping bans are made and for what reason.
And it tells clearly that vaping bans have nothing whatsoever to do with the behavior of individual vapers.



Let me also repeat a link which backs up this post:

Few dare call it bribery: OK grants, e-cigs, and another brick in the wall

Vaping bans are issued for money. For $$$$.
That's the long and the short of it.

And anybody who claims otherwise obviously does not have the knowledge.

That is why many vapers in this forum are working hard to educate others on the reality.

See the above two quotes. Use those as the basis for one of the points in your paper. Call it "The link between Politicians and Big Tobacco and the push to end vaping."
 

Ohms Lawbreaker

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 18, 2014
613
1,865
Right Behind You
Remember to point out that if the e-cig industry is permitted to be regulated by tobacco interests alone, their record before Congress of telling the truth and being forthcoming is not exactly stellar. That is probably the worst they have ever made themselves look.

temp2.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread