thr" data-source="post: 13775078" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">Maybe I'm thinking too simply, but why not allow people (anyone) to post a link to a seller's Website page which has their "statement of quality"?
Because almost all vendors already have "statements of quality" on their website, and this study has shown that very many of these claims are false, whether because vendors are mistaken or because they're dishonest (I think often a little bit of both). Anyone can link anyone to a vendor site already - there are many threads here in which "organic" juices are listed and etc. also.
The whole point of a list generated by what we learned from this study would be ascertain which specific vendors provide specific documented proof that they'd tested their product adequately (per excellent distinctions made by Kurt here) and could demonstrate the validity of their claim.
We've always had vendors out there claiming to have no D&A, they're easy to find. What would be much more helpful would be able to identify those vendors (and there were some in this study) whose products really and demonstrably are, to the extent that that can be demonstrated. (We've already exhausted the discussion in here re acknowledging and tolerating some degree of uncertainty, I hope.)
"Some sites might merely say, "Our ejuice is great," while other might go so far as to publish their lab results. And lots of them would be somewhere in between."
Exactly. None of that would be helpful. It'd just be another list of competing claims, which has it's place, but wouldn't be the function of a specifically designated list that would help people who are concerned about this (which is not a majority of vapers I think) to find what they're looking for quickly and easily.
But given the restraints (very correctly) placed on vendors here, and the legal issues for vendors (not sure if simple disclosure could be construed as advertising health benefits, but vendors have to be careful) it might be that what's needed is an off-site data base... perhaps we are really just looping back to business associations like AEMSA.
It'd be a lot nicer to have some such thing in here, where so many congregate.
Because(Racehorse)I see no reason to wait on this when I could be patronizing the "early adopters" who I would like to reward with my business, quite frankly. If it 'occured" to them then they seem like the kind of vendors who seem a little ahead of the curve, so to speak.
Last edited: