EGO type Tank atomizers

Status
Not open for further replies.

ShaneBlack

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 13, 2013
107
31
36
USA
Hello, I have a Vision Spinner VV and I was wondering what kind of Atomizers are compatible with it. I'm not very firmileir with Ego-T and Ego-C type models, could I use either one ? Is the treading the same ?
Also I was wondering If an Ego-C tank atomizer performs better then the older Ego-T tank atomizer ? I have my 510-T tank setup which I really like and I have learned a great deal how to take care of tank atomizers, I just not impressed with clearomizers and I'm wanting to have tank atomizers on my ego and just stick to them. Any insights are more then welcome, thanks.
 

ShaneBlack

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 13, 2013
107
31
36
USA
Thanks its good to see I'm not alone here. I'll post some pictures for those who don't know what I'm talking about. What it comes down to is having the performance of a 510-T, but with a battery that lasts longer then 510 batteries. Thus they came out with EGO-T. The Ego-C tank setup is supposed to be a newer improved version over the T version.

Ego-C Tank Atomizer Type A
atomizer_1.jpg


2012-Newest-Changeable-Atomizer-Tank-System-Ego-C.jpg


Type B
ego-c_type_B.jpg


510-T setup
Electronic-Cigarettes-Smok-510-Tank-Atomzier.jpg


EVOD Clearomizer
evod1b.jpg


CE4
ce4-atomizer-400x400.jpg


I'm not sure which type tank atomizer is better, and I'm still undecided on what style I like better, A or B. But this are Spike wick setups I'm used to, they provide good vapor and good throat hits on my 510-T. I experimented by trying liquid on my 510-Tank atomizer, and on my Ego Evod clearomizer. Same e-liquid was used in both, and the battery was a vision spinner VV. The 510 gave good throat hits and decent vapor, the Kanger Evod clearo gave no throat and slightly more vapor, but not enough to really to a difference. The Liquid is a 16mg strength, so seeing as the 510-Tank atomizer is smaller and the Evod clearo is bigger, the Evod would need a higher strength to give a good throat. But the 510-T does not, and the same conclusion can be speculated about the Ego Tank Atomizers since they too have a spike wick setup. This direct method of liquid going straight down rather then sideways into the atomizer like most clearos may provide stronger throat hits. The CE4 had no contest compared to the others since its a top wick setup and you have to constantly swish liquid to the wicks.
 
Last edited:

Brokil

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 15, 2013
91
57
Anonymus
I use to use an eGo-C setup for my 510 threaded pv's. I can't stand clearomizers. Too often they have cracked or found another way to break that they were not worth the money to me. The only pain/complaint I had/have with the tank system is that cleaning the atty's can become a nuisance if you switch flavors a lot. I would say start there. Unless you feel comfortable building an atty from a rebuildable kit. I wouldn't recommend it unless you are willing to take the learning curve that comes with it.
 

ShaneBlack

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 13, 2013
107
31
36
USA
I agree, I have the 510-T setup. But I really think that tank atomizer is abit small, it often slows down on vapor and throat hit production. The EGO tank setup seems abit better and it looks like the spike/wick is made bigger for better liquid flow. I find that most clearomizers end up producing a warm vapor, which to me isn't my cup of tea. The reason why is that I had several sweet flavors, I use my 510-t and the vapor is cool. When I use a clearomizer (CE4, EVOD) it makes the vapor result in an unpleasantly warm sweet taste which sometimes is too much for me and makes me sick. I prefer a cool vapor if my liquids are sweet. But this is just my personal taste preference. Anyway I ordered an EGO tank setup and I'm waiting for it to arrive, and I'll see how it performs. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread