• Need help from former MFS (MyFreedomSmokes) customers

    Has any found a supplier or company that has tobacco e-juice like or very similar to MFS Turbosmog, Tall Paul, or Red Luck?

    View thread

Electronic cigarettes just banned in my office

Status
Not open for further replies.

Southern Tina

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 31, 2013
3,911
11,051
FL
Oh man, we used to have a guy at work that bathed in old spice, I'm sure of it - he stunk up the whole office!

He died a few years back. I'm sure that was the cause of it. The stench rotted his brain out.

Rest his soul.

I'm horrible for laughing at that. I have an office but there are cubes too, and this guy would go out to secret smoke (the CEO hates it, so nobody does it anywhere on property) and he used Axe to cover it up. When I saw him walk by my office to go out, I'd get up and shut my door immediately. I finally told him "you smell like Axe and smoke...everyone knows what you're doing".
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,043
GA by way of WV
......................

The people who've got their knickers in a twist over this non-issue just sound lazy and inconsiderate.

Aren't we all lucky to have on ECF the great arbiter of what behavior and actions are correct and which ones are not. The FDA is looking for some additional egoists/bureaucrats to impose their definition of what is right and wrong on society. Something to consider.
 

danfinger

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 29, 2014
336
531
Virgo Super Cluster
It's starting to feel that way, isn't it?! Except for our fearless leader "O"... He's exempt from the laws of the land. :confused:

assuming you're referring to the signing statements thing...

It's been around since President Monroe. Up until Reagan, there had been 75 SS's all totaled. Reagan, Bush and Clinton had 247 between the three of them.

W issued 161 signing statements affecting over 1,100 provisions of law in 160 Congressional enactments.

O has issued 21 signing statements affecting 85 specified provisions and making six mentions of unspecified provisions of law in 20 Congressional enactments.

I'd say our 'fearless leader' is being pretty conservative so far.
 

Equilibrium

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 20, 2014
2,044
3,667
Georgia
I'm horrible for laughing at that. I have an office but there are cubes too, and this guy would go out to secret smoke (the CEO hates it, so nobody does it anywhere on property) and he used Axe to cover it up. When I saw him walk by my office to go out, I'd get up and shut my door immediately. I finally told him "you smell like Axe and smoke...everyone knows what you're doing".


Oh.... don't feel bad! He'd love that we are getting a laugh at his expense.

Exact same thing this guy did. He'd smoke and splash on the old spice. A horrible combination.
 

TheColdHandedVG

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 30, 2013
591
624
New York, USA
Any company can make any rules they want but the rules cannot conflict with the law. If it is not illegal for you to vape in your workplace then they cannot ban it. It might be their building but that doesn't give them the right to do whatever they want, they still need to follow the current laws. Sorry that's the best answer I can give because I am unfamiliar with the laws concerning vaping in your area.

Not necessarily. I think what you meant is that a rule in a workplace cannot BREAK a law, but that doesn't mean that the rules at work must also be laws in place at state or federal level; definitely not true.
 

danfinger

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 29, 2014
336
531
Virgo Super Cluster
It is so easy for you to make such definitive statements with no supporting evidence. Not one company I worked for had a policy about perfume or aftershave use. I am not aware of even one reported incidence, in 40 years of working for various large companies, where someone was admonished or warned about their perfume.

You are confusing 'definitive' with anecdotal. A definitive statement would have been: "All companies have policies concerning perfumes/colognes."

Which is not what I said. At all.

What I provided was anecdotal, a.k.a. personal experience- which is the same as what you've provided. That is your experience, I provided mine. Anecdotal statements do not require supporting evidence, logically it is considered subjective testimony.
 

TheColdHandedVG

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 30, 2013
591
624
New York, USA
Yes...........

I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that if the law, whether on state or federal level, is broken by any rules in your workplace then they wouldn't have to be followed or could at least be fought in court. But your place of employment CAN make rules that aren't laws already, such as no vaping inside and no pornography on your computer.
 

crxess

Grumpy Ole Man
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 20, 2012
24,438
45,972
69
Williamsport Md
Well, it bites. Sorry to hear, but it is their privilege.
Has nothing to do with right or wrong. more of being politically correct. I doubt a company that had 20 vaping employees and 1 that did not would be so quick to bow to perceived correctness. Then again what do I know.

The one place I feel companies are Breaking some law would be concerning protecting employee Health.
Any company forcing a Vaper to be herded in a confined area with smokers is deliberately exposing Non-smokers to second hand smoke.
Sooner or later the Suites will hit the fan.
 

danfinger

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 29, 2014
336
531
Virgo Super Cluster
Such a politically correct way to tell others that they are weak, should tow the line and be a better person, defined by what you think is the best way for all humans to act.

I think being considerate of others is actually a really great way to act, so yes. We need more of this.
 

bluecat

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jun 22, 2012
3,489
3,626
Cincy
Any company can make any rules they want but the rules cannot conflict with the law. If it is not illegal for you to vape in your workplace then they cannot ban it. It might be their building but that doesn't give them the right to do whatever they want, they still need to follow the current laws. Sorry that's the best answer I can give because I am unfamiliar with the laws concerning vaping in your area.

It is legal to drink alcohol if you are over 21 in the US. Well, that may change soon. Anyway.. Most businesses do not allow the consumption of alcohol on company time and some even at company events. To do so would be immediate release. So while it may be legal to consume alcohol you risk being canned at the work place. You can still drink alcohol you just won't be under that business' employment.

So they aren't necessarily banning it. For the privilege to work for their company you must follow their rules. Many states have a no indoor smoking policy. States are not sure what to do. They were too busy figuring out how to ream the taxpayer after the feds reamed the states... this caught them off guard now they are scrambling because... "We Must Control".
 

JustB'nMe

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 25, 2013
418
499
TX
They can, by law, not hire you based on their anti-tobacco policies. A customer of mine has the same thing and they will nicotine test you at a medical facility before you are offered the job. If you fail, no job.

Realistically, even if they are possibly including electronic cigarettes in error or miss-information; again, it is their right to not hire someone that doesn't meet the pre-employments they set if the reasoning is justified.

I work with big hospitals nationwide and LOTS have this policy. Here's a behind the scenes reason. They don't want someone going outside to smoke, then coming back in and taking care of patients. It stinks, there's the back and forth about 3rd hand smoke (I know, ridiculous). About 99% only do it on a pre-hire basis. They don't go around randomly drug testing employees...that's way too expensive for them. It takes about 5 days for nicotine to get out of your system. It's too difficult to make exceptions (for vaping, nic gum, whatever) because people find loopholes. It's usually an all or nothing thing.

I get it drummerskey and Tina, I really do. As long as a company is within the confines of the law, they can get away with it. I guess I'm wondering where does it stop? What are they going to test for next as a "justified" reason to deny someone employment? Let's face it, no one is guaranteed immortality. We all are going to die and plenty of us will likely have health issues in our later years regardless of whether we've taken care of bodies or not.

I was exposed to tobacco smoke second hand for most of my life and long before I became a smoker myself. Was there enough in my system to show up if I was tested? Who knows? Have I had problems as a result of that? As I think back, it's possible. I guess the ideology of being eliminated as a prospect for employment just because of nicotine or tobacco, despite being qualified, just bothers me. :shrug:

Live well, Love hard, Laugh often & Vape on!
 

Dj tank

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 13, 2013
379
273
Ann Arbor michigan
Sucks for sure... but I agree with your employer on the ban. I vape in my office all day and there is a constant cloud in here. Not to mention there is a discernable odor depending on the juices I vape. Lastly there are 3 co-workers in my office area that claim they have a PG allergy...which I believe...because when they enter my office, they sneeze and beging having major sinus issues. My solution was to ban THEM from coming into my office and we now meet in a conference room when needed. :)

Look...just because they don't reak like a cigarette and cause cancer...doesn't mean you can vape it anywhere. A little common sense that vaping may annoy people...like when they walk into a big cloud of your recently exhaled vape. That being said, if you have a bathroom at work it's probably where I'd go to have a few hits every hour. ;)
 

JustB'nMe

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 25, 2013
418
499
TX
Lastly there are 3 co-workers in my office area that claim they have a PG allergy...which I believe...because when they enter my office, they sneeze and beging having major sinus issues. My solution was to ban THEM from coming into my office and we now meet in a conference room when needed. :)

This.....lol!

Live well, Love hard, Laugh often & Vape on!
 

Steamix

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 21, 2013
1,586
3,196
Vapistan
They can, by law, not hire you based on their anti-tobacco policies. A customer of mine has the same thing and they will nicotine test you at a medical facility before you are offered the job. If you fail, no job.

It's a bit scary, how prospective employers are encraaoching on the life style of their prospective employees.

Not just in relation to vaping.

Guess those days where you signed up for x hours of work in exchange for y amount of bucks and npbpdy gave a dammn about your private life are going. Nowadays they expect you to sign over your soul as well it seems.

Well, too late for that. Signed away already to some fella with red skin and funny protrusions on his head, luring me with some mods ;)
 

JoppaRoadCruiser

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 27, 2014
724
1,989
Dallas, TX
Well, let me further agree with you kind random lady that I don't know.

I think that companies and business owners should make any decisions about their business they want, for whatever reason they choose. We as consumers and employees can then choose if we want to work there/buy there and that will or will not determine that businesses success. There is a new trend of telling companies what they can and cannot do or business owners what they can and cannot say and with each one, it is just your freedom of speech eroding away.

If I am being selfish, do I agree with it? Nope but I can go work somewhere else.

This 100%. It may be stupid but it's their right to make stupid decisions. It is also your right not to work for them if you don't want to. If not vaping in your office is that big of a deal, go find a job that lets you do that. Or start your own business and do whatever you want in your office.

And to the OP...this may seem like a bad policy but think with me a little here. Sitting at your desk for long periods of time is bad news mang. I try to take a walk around the office every 2 hours just to get my blood flowing. Look for as many times as you can to get up and walk around. I know I went off on a tangent here but I was just having a conversation with a friend last night about how bad it is to be sedentary for extended periods of time. Research has come out recently confirming this. Also, sometimes its not so bad to make yourself wait. The vape is that much more rewarding...I promise. I do this every day. But yeah I understand you don't like the policy.
 
Last edited:

drummerskey

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2012
2,133
4,330
little birdhouse in your soul
I get it drummerskey and Tina, I really do. As long as a company is within the confines of the law, they can get away with it. I guess I'm wondering where does it stop? What are they going to test for next as a "justified" reason to deny someone employment? Let's face it, no one is guaranteed immortality. We all are going to die and plenty of us will likely have health issues in our later years regardless of whether we've taken care of bodies or not.

I was exposed to tobacco smoke second hand for most of my life and long before I became a smoker myself. Was there enough in my system to show up if I was tested? Who knows? Have I had problems as a result of that? As I think back, it's possible. I guess the ideology of being eliminated as a prospect for employment just because of nicotine or tobacco, despite being qualified, just bothers me. :shrug:

Live well, Love hard, Laugh often & Vape on!

You have every right to be bothered but if I did own a business, I would hope I could make whatever policies I wanted. It is, after all; my money and my business. I also think I should be able to do pretty much anything I want as long as I do not harm others but I would expect that much freedom to come with a cost somewhere. Sadly, we don't really have real freedoms anymore; we have distractions

I don't personally agree with companies denying employment based on nicotine use, credit checks, criminal backgrounds (to a degree) and you can protest it but at the expense of a job. That is the reality.

Was I mad for a few minutes when they said I couldn't vape indoors any more? Sure............but vaping isn't a freedom. It is an allowance and before anyone gets high and mighty about our ability to do so (not saying anyone here is), there is plenty of other freedoms we have already lost that A. We should be fighting for too and B. put us on the road and put us in this exact situation.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
  • Apr 16, 2010
    41,132
    1
    82,599
    So-Cal
    Wow. Same thing happened at my work because they're uneducated and say that "it can easily have illegal substances in it." They said that someone put *edit*dry herbs/oils* in their ecig and lied about it and said that it was just nicotine.

    This Isn't the first time that e-Cigarette use has been Restricted because of that. And it Isn't going to be the Last.

    And it is a Good Example of how a Vaper can Give All Vaper's a Bad Name.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread