Yeah but D cells generally cost double of what C cells cost. So why are people paying double? That seems really dishonest to me.Packaging to fit the application is OK as long as the MAH rating equals the labeling on the outside, IMO. Still, it's strange that they had to do that to provide the size and MAH rating. We are used to a cell being filled with electrolyte. I guess technology is providing efficient electrolyte materials that don't require filling the can to the top.
Paying for the technology I guess , if they can do a D "can" with the guts of a C,and get the same performance who really looses?Yeah but D cells generally cost double of what C cells cost. So why are people paying double? That seems really dishonest to me.
But you pay more for the D size which is filled with air.Paying for the technology I guess , if they can do a D "can" with the guts of a C,and get the same performance who really looses?
If they were filled like some off brands, they would be 10000mah or more.i dont know the MAH of a "regular" D battery assuming its 2000mah
I'll take a quad D cell mod, please and thank you.If they were filled like some off brands, they would be 10000mah or more.
ok now that I know this I agree, its a very crappy thing to do, and should be disclosed/ disseminated to everyone maybe even a boycott but retailers are in the Big battery club, otherwise, I'm sure we would have more choices than the Du and EnTypical alkaline D capacity is 12000-18000 mAh (18-27 Wh)....but don't run 'em too hard
Exactly, and my thoughts on it are that they probably opted for a cell size that performs as needed and doesn't require an extremely long charge time, NIMH cells seem to do best with a gentle charge current in my experience, and I have driven devices with sub-c cell packs that were designed for D-cells and those packs worked wonderfully. An 8,000 MaH cell would need 160 hours or more to fully charge with a 50 Mah charger, 80 hours at 100 Mah charge rate. Folks more in the know could use a smart charger and a sled to up the current into the cells, but then you are balancing charge time vs wear and tear...and even though the modern cells hold charge better than just a few years ago, they all seem to loose some charge while sitting...so there's that aspect.So.... Yemme see if I have got this Straight.
The guy with the Vid say he Believes that the Energizer and the Duracell has the mAh that the OEM's spec sheets states. And that Same mAh is Clearly printed on both the Packaging and on the Battery Wrap.
So where Exactly is the Problem?