FDA FDA Bans Pure and Highly Concentrated Caffeine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,222
SE PA
No, this is not directly related to vaping, but... Have a look at their press release here. Then consider the fact that they're doing this strictly via "guidance". No "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" and normal regulatory process, just instant "fiat". What follows is an except from the actual guidance document:

These products are typically meant to be diluted before being consumed, and not consumed “as is.” An amount of highly concentrated liquid caffeine that would be safe for a given individual to consume in a properly diluted solution could nonetheless be unsafe for the same individual if the highly concentrated liquid were consumed directly. In the reasonably foreseeable scenario where a consumer makes an error diluting the product, or does not dilute it at all, that consumer could ingest a toxic quantity of caffeine.

Substitute one word, "nicotine" for "caffeine", and you've got a template for an instant ban on DIY nic base being sold to consumers. No notice, just done. :grr:
 

Opinionated

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 19, 2015
11,168
59,365
55
My Mountain
I have a question though. .. isn't this unconstitutional?

Can congress cede the power to make law to the FDA like this? Because basically they have..

Congress made one law giving basic law making control to the FDA, and it seems unconstitutional since no one in the FDA is an elected official so basically they are making laws (such as its illegal to sell caffeine concentrate to consumers) and we have zero representation concerning these new laws.
 

bombastinator

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 12, 2010
11,784
24,832
MN USA
I have a question though. .. isn't this unconstitutional?

Can congress cede the power to make law to the FDA like this? Because basically they have..

Congress made one law giving basic law making control to the FDA, and it seems unconstitutional since no one in the FDA is an elected official so basically they are making laws (such as its illegal to sell caffeine concentrate to consumers) and we have zero representation concerning these new laws.
Yep. It’s technically presidential powers. he appoints them. All the regulatory agencies are like that.
 

bombastinator

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 12, 2010
11,784
24,832
MN USA
No, this is not directly related to vaping, but... Have a look at their press release here. Then consider the fact that they're doing this strictly via "guidance". No "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" and normal regulatory process, just instant "fiat". What follows is an except from the actual guidance document:

These products are typically meant to be diluted before being consumed, and not consumed “as is.” An amount of highly concentrated liquid caffeine that would be safe for a given individual to consume in a properly diluted solution could nonetheless be unsafe for the same individual if the highly concentrated liquid were consumed directly. In the reasonably foreseeable scenario where a consumer makes an error diluting the product, or does not dilute it at all, that consumer could ingest a toxic quantity of caffeine.

Substitute one word, "nicotine" for "caffeine", and you've got a template for an instant ban on DIY nic base being sold to consumers. No notice, just done. :grr:
They already do that though with 100mg being the highest concentration you can buy. Pure is something like 1000mg and is hellishly dangerous.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,314
1
83,837
So-Cal
Yep... The Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act is a Very Powerful Instrument.

402(f)(1)(A) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act


ADULTERATED FOOD


SEC. 402
. [21 U.S.C. 342] A food shall be deemed to be adulterated—
.
.
.
(f)(1) If it is a dietary supplement or contains a dietary ingredient that—

(A) presents a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury under—

http://www.gmptrainingsystems.com/files/u1/pdf/Section_402_Adulteration.pdf
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,314
1
83,837
So-Cal
I have a question though. .. isn't this unconstitutional?

Can congress cede the power to make law to the FDA like this? Because basically they have..

Congress made one law giving basic law making control to the FDA, and it seems unconstitutional since no one in the FDA is an elected official so basically they are making laws (such as its illegal to sell caffeine concentrate to consumers) and we have zero representation concerning these new laws.

What New Law is FDA making?
 

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,222
SE PA
I have a question though. .. isn't this unconstitutional?
That's a matter of opinion. Unfortunately your opinion and mine don't matter.

And of course the FDA claims Congress gave them the authority to do this in section 402(f)(1)(A) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

In addition, they keep using the word "adulterated" in their guidance, just like they do in the Deeming. I'm not sure how any substance that's chemically pure can possibly be described as "adulterated", except of course to a bureaucrat.
 

Opinionated

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 19, 2015
11,168
59,365
55
My Mountain
Yep. It’s technically presidential powers. he appoints them. All the regulatory agencies are like that.

Congress can't cede law making control to the president... it's unconstitutional.

We have a system of government for a reason, and that system is set up in order that "we the people" have representation in government where concerns new laws..

Ceding law making power to an agency who are not answerable to a constituency is to violate the constitutional rights of the citizenry as it leaves us with no representation.
 

Opinionated

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 19, 2015
11,168
59,365
55
My Mountain
That's a matter of opinion. Unfortunately your opinion and mine don't matter.

And of course the FDA claims Congress gave them the authority to do this in section 402(f)(1)(A) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

In addition, they keep using the word "adulterated" in their guidance, just like they do in the Deeming. I'm not sure how any substance that's chemically pure can possibly be described as "adulterated", except of course to a bureaucrat.

Yet I don't think it's constitutional..

Has anyone challenged it on that basis? That these "rules" carry the weight of law so they are unconstitutional?
 

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,222
SE PA
They already do that though with 100mg being the highest concentration you can buy.
Horsefeathers. 100mg is the highest that most vendors sell, but there are vendors who will sell much higher concentrations. We're just not allowed to link to them here on ECF, but this it isn't due to any law or regulation, at least not yet. I'll also speculate that when such a regulation does come about, the limit for sale to consumers will be lower than 100mg.
 

stols001

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 30, 2017
29,338
108,118
I swear... I'm buying my last two liters of nic today. I don't think I use "concentrated" coffee unless out and about (Starbucks) I wonder what they're thinking of this law.

I read that book, "The history of Coffee" I think it was called, and we've had "coffee wars" in the US, including pricing, but I have NO idea how that "decision" came about, and it sounded stealthy. Gah. Oh well, at least it is ONLY two liters, (Wizard Labs is 20% off until tomorrow BTW in case anyone uses them) but thankfully, I've been stockpiling like a little ant. Don't want to lose at the HOME STRETCH either. LOL.

Anna
 

sofarsogood

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2014
5,553
14,167
And don't forget the chance of a trade war with China. The original Pico has remained my preferred mod since it came out. I've intended to get a couple more, been procrastinating on that.

Go read anything on the FDA website. Every word is written by lawyers. Our health is the last thing on their minds.
 

Letitia

Citrus Junkie
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2017
25,182
132,232
West Frankfort, IL
When enough people decide to quit letting our government do our thinking for us maybe some things will change. Americans are lazy, greedy. self involved, and spoiled. It's our own fault for letting it get this far. So how does one best break down a gallon of nic for storage?
 

440BB

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 19, 2011
9,222
33,992
The Motor City
Substitute one word, "nicotine" for "caffeine", and you've got a template for an instant ban on DIY nic base being sold to consumers. No notice, just done. :grr:

I had the same reaction. I can't see why they'd stop at caffeine. All the same justifications. Damn.
 

leftyandsparky

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 22, 2015
4,029
17,924
Somewhere in the South
And don't forget the chance of a trade war with China. The original Pico has remained my preferred mod since it came out. I've intended to get a couple more, been procrastinating on that.

Go read anything on the FDA website. Every word is written by lawyers. Our health is the last thing on their minds.
Health cabinet has them on sale for $20
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread