Hello fellow vapourizers / non-smokers,
I am new to the site so please forgive me if this has already been suggested.
I believe it would be very beneficial if a manufacturer would give us
the choice of a fluid which didn't contain the PG, thereby producing
non-visible vapour.
This would be great in public places--we could remain discreet,
(especially with black or stainless models)
and not upset or invite controversy from anti-smokers with even the LOOK of "smoking".
I think that the anti-smokers HATE even the appearance of smoking
and some even get enraged
, just because of the look.
They are operating almost purely on an emotional basis in their reaction to e-cigs/vapourizers.
If we had always had the choice of discreet invisible vapour and used that fluid if we were around anti-smokers it's possible we may not be facing resistance now or at least far less, and may have even won some more of them over
to at least consider a rational discussion.
I am not positive, but I don't believe smoking has been villified in China
(at least nowhere to the degree it has in the West) and the manufacturers may only now be realizing what we are up against politically.
I have asked some fluid manufacturers to please give us the choice of "non-visible" vapour. I'm asking if some of you would as well---
Plesse ask your fluid supplier(s) to give us the choice of a discreet non-visible vapour for use where the e-cig might start controversy or even confrontation because of non-informed or misinformed no/anti-smokers.
We just cant lose this.
A hypothetical analogy to the illogic of banning e-cigs could be:
Coffee "A" has caffeine, but for whatever reason, also has possibly hundreds of toxic and carcinogenic compounds in it.
Coffee "B" only has caffeine and maybe a few FDA "approved safe" constituents in it.
Should the FDA ban the safe / far safer coffee "B"?
Thanks for reading
Nick
I am new to the site so please forgive me if this has already been suggested.
I believe it would be very beneficial if a manufacturer would give us
the choice of a fluid which didn't contain the PG, thereby producing
non-visible vapour.
This would be great in public places--we could remain discreet,
(especially with black or stainless models)
and not upset or invite controversy from anti-smokers with even the LOOK of "smoking".
I think that the anti-smokers HATE even the appearance of smoking
and some even get enraged

They are operating almost purely on an emotional basis in their reaction to e-cigs/vapourizers.
If we had always had the choice of discreet invisible vapour and used that fluid if we were around anti-smokers it's possible we may not be facing resistance now or at least far less, and may have even won some more of them over
to at least consider a rational discussion.
I am not positive, but I don't believe smoking has been villified in China
(at least nowhere to the degree it has in the West) and the manufacturers may only now be realizing what we are up against politically.
I have asked some fluid manufacturers to please give us the choice of "non-visible" vapour. I'm asking if some of you would as well---
Plesse ask your fluid supplier(s) to give us the choice of a discreet non-visible vapour for use where the e-cig might start controversy or even confrontation because of non-informed or misinformed no/anti-smokers.
We just cant lose this.
A hypothetical analogy to the illogic of banning e-cigs could be:
Coffee "A" has caffeine, but for whatever reason, also has possibly hundreds of toxic and carcinogenic compounds in it.
Coffee "B" only has caffeine and maybe a few FDA "approved safe" constituents in it.
Should the FDA ban the safe / far safer coffee "B"?
Thanks for reading
Nick