Ok, busy busy this morning, what I have been up to, here is 5 minutes of my life
Dan
Dan
Ok, busy busy this morning, what I have been up to, here is 5 minutes of my life
Dan
400 wicks (capillary action) much better than 325. 325 drains faster with overhead tanks and can be confused with wicking. The smaller the hole the greater the capilary rise of the liquid. The holes in the 400 are smaller than in the 325. From winking in wiki: Thus for a 4 m (13 ft) diameter glass tube in lab conditions given above (radius 2 m (6.6 ft)), the water would rise an unnoticeable 0.007 mm (0.00028 in). However, for a 4 cm (1.6 in) diameter tube (radius 2 cm (0.79 in)), the water would rise 0.7 mm (0.028 in), and for a 0.4 mm (0.016 in) diameter tube (radius 0.2 mm (0.0079 in)), the water would rise 70 mm (2.8 in).I'm curious -- and I don't have all of the material necessary to experiment -- but given that it seems to be a tradeoff between flavour (400 mesh) and throat hit (325 mesh) what if you cut half the width of both gauges and rolled them one inside the other? Would that make any difference? I'm trying to do the hydrodynamics in my head but can't quite decide if it wouldn't matter because it's only the mesh that touches the coil that matters (amount of liquid in direct contact with the coil) or if it's the speed of wicking that makes the difference.
Not sur ewhat you are talking about the hole lining up. there should only be one small segment where the hole would be blocked by the post .... right?
My pleasure. Wish it was more. I hope everybody sends a lil' somethin'.Thanks! Half is better than none! Gotta keep the wife in rum and diet cokes
Scubadaughter has been helping and kicking .... with the packing process, so a shout to her for helping!
Will drop more packages off today at the post office so the last list post will be correct as of 12:00 noon today.
If anyone else want to by me a virtual beer, I made a simple webpage for donations for the vapestock slush fund
Scubabatdans support page <---Covert
Dan
Don't be offended, but did you check all the air holes for a obstruction? It has happened before with other similar attys.
OK. Would someone explain the airflow that I should be getting with this atty. I've smoked 901's and scubagens with 2 airholes about 1 mm each and get clouds of vapor, but I don't seem to be getting appreciable airflow with mine. I looked at the hole alignment thing and even tried leaving a distance on the 2 threaded sections of about 1/16", with no better results.
Should I be considering drilling out the atty section airhole to a larger diameter?
No drilling just check all the air hole to make sure there are no burs left behind, found a couple like that I had to ream each air hole out, then the air flow was good.
Dan
Got two together, don't envey dan one bit on the assembled unit line.
Tried the T Tank and get plenty of vapor but bad burnt taste. Any tricks to getting the t tank to wick better? I am going to switch out the juice in the am to make sure it's not contaminated.
Wicks and coils are in A1 shape. Run successfully on previous gtus.
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk 2