If there has been no change in the design of the positive pin connection then the new GEM will be an entirely inferior and flakey device in temperature limited mode.
I have two of the stainless steel GEMs and both are among the worst atomizers I have ever used with temperature limiting. I cannot bring myself to sell them to another unsuspecting vapor so they will go into the trash pile of failed devices.
Duane
Wow. That's a bit strong no? I have to adjust the center pin depending on the device but once I do it's not like it fluctuates much.
I have a hypothesis that just because he DNA 200 chip samples a million times a minute and has computer software to monitor doesn't make it he best temp Device. I have several other temp
Mods ranging from $30-$200 which work a lot better than the DNA 200 mod I had (and sent back)
If your experience is using DNA 200 devices is urge you to try the Yihi chipset devices. I don't have those issues
In fact right now I have a stainless gem on a istick tc (40watt) as other devices are unavailable - it's the cheapest temp decide I own and possible could be considered the worst.
That said it doesn't burn the cotton if I test it with the gem and it maintains a steady vape. So I can't agree the gem is hat bad with temp control.
It takes a second or two to get the pin set to the right level by once it is it seems ok to me. There are probably more rock solid temp rta but I don't think it's anywhere near as bad as some ive used.
But that's just my experience. Maybe it's been too long since I used it on the boxer or other device. But on the evic mini and istick it's working great. Cotton doesn't burn. Resistance stays steady without locking. Vape is reliable and regular.
For what it's worth I am someone who in this read has stated issues with the center pin. But to say it doesn't work to me is an overstatement.
As far as I'm concerned all Of the "exposed" atomizers which were "outed " by the DNA 200 chipset if anything show the DNA 200 chipset isn't doing things the right way - or is over sampling or Too sensitive. . Why make a temp device which 85% of tanks don't work with? Too many temp Mods work with the gem to say it is fundamentally broken. The one that doesn't work well With it also doesn't work well With a ton of
Other atomizers imo
Just an opinion. My experience could change or vary. Maybe I'll throw a temp Build in the ti and try it on the boxer Thursday to see what my results are vs the stainless. It's possible I've forgotten some difficulty I experienced but I don't recall it being bad on anything but the dna200 - which again j Could say about almost very thing I own.
However If you're set to dump the gems let us know. I'm sure a few of Us would buy them knowing how they perform For a good Price
Oh and just to say I appreciate you sharing your opinion and in sorry you've had so much trouble. I know how it feels (for me wicking) and I certainly don't discount it. I wonder if maybe it's an isolated issue to dna200 which I've experienced as well or if you're using a bunch of different chips.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Anything we can do To help you troubleshoot?
Tell ya what. I'm going to do a stainless steel build to use on the evic mini v3 software with both tcr curve and their existing stainless profile. I'll
Post back how it goes. Maybe you're right and it's going to have some issues. Let's see
Ps for nickel I use five wraps including he lead in out so
/|||/
and wick thick.