- Status
I know that I'll pay for this, but I have another question
In UFS now CT and LT are connected when fully assembled. Do you think that it might be possible to make liquid control as a part of atom adapter. So you can disasable CT and LT without empting LT. Actually this is also allow to have adapter for 901, without liquid control, but in same UFS.
Also Adapter for 901 probably may regulate liquid almost same way, but closing side hole. I'll try to draw simple picture. tank capacity will be reduced a bit in this case of cause.
And even more questions. Do you think that height of CT may be a bit reduced? Anyway it can work only with small amount of liquid in it ~ 0,5ml, but can hold about 2 I gess.
Nice questions twi.
Ok, I think that its not possible to make the LT moving on an adapter but I can make further thoughts about it. Who knows, maybe we can do it, maybe not
As for CT, it holds 2ml but in vertical position it cant hold more than 1 ml without leaking.
I own both, and the GGTS is the way to go, As many have stated, its easy to go from different battery setups, without carrying extra parts around with you. The GGT was a great product, but when the GGTS was born with the telescopic part, it was like heaven... makes it what it is today.... and it would be like going backwards if we went back to the GGT style, of carrying extra sleeves around.....
Once you get the hang of how tight you can go, you wont have any issues, You will get the feel for it....
-Tim
Once you get the hang of how tight you can go, you wont have any issues, You will get the feel for it....
-Tim
I don't even go that tight with the ggts, just enough so it doesn't unscrew when I am vaping. I don't want to carry extra sleeves with me if I ever decide to bring it out of the house lol. It's too pretty and if i dropped it outside and not on my carpet I would probably hurt someone.
Any hints on what your cooking up in regards to this post?Ok guys, I thought of something very special this time. Your thoughts gave me some food lol. Thanks to all of you
Guys, I have two GGTS and love both
But I still can't understand why are you talking about extra sleeves? With GGTS if you want to go from 16340 to 18650 you have to carry one additional part anyway. The only thing I would really like is to have GG no TS (even no need for extentions, or optional extantions) which will be as short as possible to accomodate 16340 (or 18350) and will be able originaly connected to existing AVS/UFS. If there will be shorter version of UFS that will be fantastic.
I've found out for myself that I want to have together with GGTS something stealth, but not thin as GGSlim, but as short as possible even with same diameter as GGTS.
Great thing that Imeo also plan something in this direction
If you use a 16340 or 18350, sure you would need to carry an extra part. But I only use a fully collapsed GGTS for small batteries (e.g. 18490/18500) or extend the TS for larger batteries (e.g. 18650/2xLiFePO4) so I don't carry any extra parts. With your recommendation, I would be required to carry at least one extra part. Probably more.
That's what I meant anyway.
That's what I meant anyway.
Since I got the UFS, I've stopped using 18650 batteries with it because they make my GG much taller. So the batteries I got except 186500 are 18490 and RCR123A. I like it with 18490 setup. But after I saw your picture of GG with a 16340 battery, I'm interested in either 16340 or 18350
It looks so cool!!Guys, I have two GGTS and love both
The only thing I would really like is to have GG no TS (even no need for extentions, or optional extantions) which will be as short as possible to accomodate 16340 (or 18350) and will be able originaly connected to existing AVS/UFS. If there will be shorter version of UFS that will be fantastic.
I've found out for myself that I want to have together with GGTS something stealth, but not thin as GGSlim, but as short as possible even with same diameter as GGTS.
Great thing that Imeo also plan something in this direction
We are talking about extra sleeves when there was no GGTS, there just was a GGT, GGTransformer, witch instead of having a telescopic part, you just had sleeves, and you would have to add a piece to use 6 volts, or remove a part to do 3 volts, etc etc.
When the GGTS was born, there was no need for extra sleeves, as ya know.
-Tim
Yeah, when Imeo was giving his list of different versions of GGs for Bruce's museum/collection I heard for the first time the GG Giant, I had heard of the nano and grant but didn't know there was a third size!!!!
It was made passe' by the GGTS he also said......
It was made passe' by the GGTS he also said......Rip,
Yes, the GGT, came with 3 sleeves, they would consider the 1 sleeve, a nano, 2 sleeves, a grant, and all three sleeves the giant gg. Giant GG is basically 2xcr123a batterys for 6 volts... that would require all 3 sleeves. Basically the GGTS does all of the above, but without carrying around all these sleeves. But before the GGT, there was a standalone GG Grant, and GG Nano...etc.
Yes, the GGT, came with 3 sleeves, they would consider the 1 sleeve, a nano, 2 sleeves, a grant, and all three sleeves the giant gg. Giant GG is basically 2xcr123a batterys for 6 volts... that would require all 3 sleeves. Basically the GGTS does all of the above, but without carrying around all these sleeves. But before the GGT, there was a standalone GG Grant, and GG Nano...etc.
Since I got the UFS, I've stopped using 18650 batteries with it because they make my GG much taller. So the batteries I got except 186500 are 18490 and RCR123A. I like it with 18490 setup. But after I saw your picture of GG with a 16340 battery, I'm interested in either 16340 or 18350
The only problem is that I can't get my UFS to work with this setup, so I vape it at 6V!
i enjoy the GGTS. It is really solid. The only really pet peeve i have with it is. That there is a little play in the Lower thread when pressing the button. I really don't think it is a problem at all. It just doesn't feel as solid when it has movement like that when pressing the button for a vape.
Aesthetically. The GGTS is a work of art. The one with the sleeves looks like a dime a dozen design...=). JMHO.
Aesthetically. The GGTS is a work of art. The one with the sleeves looks like a dime a dozen design...=). JMHO.
I had to make threads a little more lose because I didnt want to see stuck threads in a steel construction studio. I am sure you dont want to see this too buddy
- Status
