The point being, is there are already many Mods that use a single battery, but the Modders themselves are learning they MAY have to consider making units that only support "safe" batteries, rather then open themselves up to potential law suits. This is a really new area of both hardware and aftermarket accessories. I like many others here are "end users", and just look at the current market for what we think we may like in product terms. If you are on the marketing end, meaning you design, develop and market a product, you have many other things to consider. There may in fact come a time where you find these kinds of Mods that you bought are NO longer marketed, and will feel lucky that you still own them. Safety has to, in the end be the main consideration. Now that is a huge conversation, since those of us living in the U.S. have many organizations that PRETEND to look our for our safety, like the bogus FDA, but unfortunately, since they are "in bed" with the money making lobbies like the tobacco industry, we suffer from others making decisions on what is really "safe" as opposed to what is really safe. As of this writing, we are still able to choose from various "mod" makers, so the responsibility of buying safe to use products is on US, for now.
I know what your saying and personally I wont buy any device unless I see they have taken all the precautions in case of the present known risks. But using batteries in series that are not design for such a load is a risk of the user not seller. And I think these sights that sell mods that can be used at HV should have a Terms of use and Risks page and then has to click yes I understand before being allowed to pay for the device. Just in case of law suits and protecting the seller. Now if maker did not take the necessary precautions to help prevent incase of such problems then it should be of fault of maker unless the user is taking unnecessary risks.
Last edited: