it's not about genitalia Scott.
On this point we completely agree - it's not about genitalia. What irritates me is that, for the poster who started all this, it is. "
men identified as women have not had and do not intend to complete the physical changes and so still "have the parts". Understandably, festival would then not remain a male-free space."
The mighty penis trumps everything. Behavior, brain structure, body chemistry, identity, they all cower before The Power Of The Penis, whose mere cloaked presence transforms and destroys everything sacred in this holiest of holy women's space. It would be entertaining to believe a little scrap of skin actually had that level of control, but it's utter and complete crap, from start to finish. And let's not ignore the little sideways slap at women who are infertile:
the vibrations that run thru our entire beings...the duality of male/female, the reproductive possibilities whether we choose to exercise them or not. Pity the poor soul who doesn't have a choice to exercise. She must secretly be a man, too.
And the sad part is, the whole idea is just a ghettoization of women. The same way gay men are supposed to be natural interior designers, fashion mavens, and absolute best friends to straight women, this whole mysterious essence of womanhood is just another way to make women something different, strange and inexplicable. But rather than reject it wholesale, there's an entire subculture built up around it. Women are mysterious creatures, who can't possibly be understood by men - or those who people like SuZamme have decided in their infinite wisdom are men.
I spent my whole childhood rebelling against what everyone else told me I had to be and couldn't be. So yes, I'm passionate about allowing people the freedom and space to be who they are, completely. And I don't think it's OK for me to stand by and give my tacit consent while some self-appointed Sex Police starts issuing edicts about everyone else.