Governor Schwarzenegger Protects Adult Consumers’ Access to E-Cigarettes

Status
Not open for further replies.

LaceyUnderall

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 4, 2008
2,568
5
USA and Canada
For Immediate Release

Contact:
Matt Salmon
202.841.6729
msalmon@policyimpact.com


Governor Schwarzenegger Protects Adult Consumers’ Access to E-Cigarettes
Industry hails veto of anti-smoking alternative bill as victory for consumers, common sense
Washington, D.C. – October 12, 2009 | Matt Salmon, president of the Electronic Cigarette Association (ECA), today praised California Governor Schwarzenegger’s wise decision to veto Senate Bill 400, which would have banned electronic cigarette sales in the state, protecting adult consumers’ access to these alternative smoking devices.

“This is not just a victory for consumers and common sense but is smart public policy as well,” said Salmon. “Rejecting this bill is the right step and should serve as a model for other states to follow.”

In his veto message, Governor Schwarzenegger reiterated the stance of the ECA that strongly supports restricting access of electronic cigarettes to children under the age of 18. “We agree with the original intent of SB 400 to ban sales to those under the legal smoking age. And we support that on a national level as well,” added Salmon.

The Governor affirmed that this restriction should not apply to adult consumers: “If adults want to purchase and consume these products with an understanding of the associated health risks, they should be able to do so unless and until federal law changes the legal status of these tobacco products.”

The ECA actively communicated to the Governor its members’ concerns about the bill and the fact that banning these electronic cigarettes would disenfranchise thousands of California adult smokers who have difficulty quitting but want an alternative to combustible cigarettes without the host of carcinogens and harmful chemicals. Salmon credited this legislative victory to the efforts of thousands of consumers and ECA members who appealed directly to Governor Schwarzenegger to protect their rights.

“While we know that combustible tobacco smoking kills over 400,000 Americans annually, and the percentage of smokers that quit every year is dismally low, we ought to be looking for more alternatives to traditional combustible tobacco products,” said Salmon.

Electronic cigarette kits usually include the electronic cigarette, a replaceable cartridge pack (that may or may not contain nicotine), rechargeable lithium batteries, and a charger. There is some variation between different companies in what is included in their starter kit, but all components are listed on their Web sites. While ECA members do not market these devices as a healthy alternative or smoking cessation device, it is clear that they do not contain the harmful tars and hundreds of carcinogens that consumers get from combustible tobacco products.

“We look forward to working with all government agencies, including the FDA, to ensure that consumers who want an alternative to combustible tobacco products have access to e-cigarettes that contain fewer harmful substances and produce no secondhand smoke,” concluded Salmon.

###

About the Electronic Cigarette Association

The ECA (www.ecassoc.org <http://www.ecassoc.org>) is an association of private sector companies engaged in electronic cigarette technologies. Its mission is to provide the tools and information necessary for policy-makers, opinion leaders, media, and private sector companies worldwide to make informed decisions about the management and use of electronic cigarette technologies. The association institutes and promotes industry-wide standards and a code of conduct, works to maintain sound professional practices, educates the public and policy-makers on the industry’s activities and potential, and works to ensure the ethical use of electronic cigarette technologies.
 

LaceyUnderall

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 4, 2008
2,568
5
USA and Canada
Thanks BigJim!

For any of you bloggers out there, feel free to post this press release on your blogs! The more traction we can get regarding this huge victory for the ecig/PV community the better.

Everyone should be so proud who worked towards this goal and it is PROOF that what Margaret Mead said is true:

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

Let's keep this momentum going!!!

Krakkan - Yes! Policy Impact was a huge move for the ECA. Matt is a great representative for the vaping community and I LOVE that he is a non-smoker!
 

Pumaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 5, 2009
114
0
In hindsight, this was probably an obvious bet

arnoldsmokingtent1jr9.jpg
 

Timekey

Moved On
Jun 3, 2009
41
0
Yeah but where was the ECA prior to Arnold vetoing the bill? Nowhere. I'm not interested in reading news reports from the ECA claiming some sort of victory or credit after the fact. I was REALLY interested in seeing a press release a few days prior to the veto urging some sort sort of awarness or support of the issue. Where was that? Pathetic really.
 

Toby

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Dec 10, 2008
1,009
233
York UK
www.ivapour.co.uk
Everyone should be so proud who worked towards this goal....

And you should feel proud too Lacey!!

I live in the UK, but any small victory, anywhere in the world, for the global cause that is e-cig, is absolutely excellent!! :)

I try to read your reports and links when I get round to it, and would like to thank you for all that you're doing on behalf of the global e-smoking community.
 

LaceyUnderall

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 4, 2008
2,568
5
USA and Canada
Yeah but where was the ECA prior to Arnold vetoing the bill? Nowhere. I'm not interested in reading news reports from the ECA claiming some sort of victory or credit after the fact. I was REALLY interested in seeing a press release a few days prior to the veto urging some sort sort of awarness or support of the issue. Where was that? Pathetic really.

Timekey -

In case you missed it, as I commented in another thread towards a similar comment made:

I have always found these types of statements to be very interesting.

If someone could please point me to the public forum where NFL coaches post their playbooks prior to the big game, I would sure love to know about it... Then again... the Colts are whooping .... this year ;-)

If you don't believe in the ECA that's fine. Whether you believe the ECA participated or not is your own opinion. But we also shouldn't confuse our lack of knowledge for truth.
 

westcoast2

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 5, 2009
103
0
London, UK
While ECA members do not market these devices as a healthy alternative or smoking cessation device, it is clear that they do not contain the harmful tars and hundreds of carcinogens that consumers get from combustible tobacco products.

It is bad enough with all the misinformation going around without joining in. Is the ECA trying to be a credible oraganization?

----
 

Bandit

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 17, 2009
1,319
25
In your bushes, watching you undress
A step in the right direction, kudos to the Governator on his action (or inaction as the case may be).

It's scary when anything like this comes up in CA or NY because other states take notice on their rulings. When a ban is passed in CA or NY other states very quickly follow suit. So perhaps this might delay others states actions against e-cigs.
 

Kate51

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Mar 27, 2009
3,031
22
77
Argyle Wi USA
Yeah but where was the ECA prior to Arnold vetoing the bill? Nowhere. I'm not interested in reading news reports from the ECA claiming some sort of victory or credit after the fact. I was REALLY interested in seeing a press release a few days prior to the veto urging some sort sort of awarness or support of the issue. Where was that? Pathetic really.
I would also like to encourage people to go to ECA website and see that yes, they are involved, they are working, these are people just like us who want to ensure the safe, true, reliable information and advertising being processed from the member's on every website, for every e-cig sale, and yes to prohibit these devices from juvenile consumers. These organizations must become viable the world around, what happens here does make a difference everywhere.
No one organization is going to be able to touch every base and call every shot, it's just too big a job and way too expensive. And these organizations do need help to stay alive. Rather that blindly criticize and lend credence to negative accusations, become active in every organization you can find. You will soon see it is an immense undertaking. The opposition is extremely well funded and extremely organized as well.
Public input and public money is needed very badly to overcome the immense difficulties in the way of safe and free choice of alternatives to smoke-free nicotine use for adults.
There is a very real possibility of prohibition if we don't support these efforts NOW!! It's still very early in the fight to keep e-cigs available. Now is not the time to let our voices fade, and support the effort of all organizations who care enough to put the time and effort of real people to work in a structured, effective way.
 
Last edited:
For any of you bloggers out there, feel free to post this press release on your blogs! The more traction we can get regarding this huge victory for the ecig/PV community the better.

Done...
I don't know why, but I am really proud of myself. Check my title:

"Governator Terminates Proposed Electronic Cigarette Ban"

I didn't know I could be so cheesy! My wife told me not to use that title but I just couldn't help it! I don't suggest reading it though due to my rambling analysis at the end of the post.

I prefer Pumaman's analysis!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread